IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2391-d1049817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Method for Selecting Bus Rapid Transit Corridors Based on the Economically Viable Passenger Flow Criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Pechkurov

    (Higher School of Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Dmitry Plotnikov

    (Higher School of Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Andrey Gorev

    (Higher School of Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Tatiana Kudryavtseva

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Aushra Banite

    (Higher School of Transport, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Angi Skhvediani

    (Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

The creation of bus rapid transit systems requires significant investments in transport infrastructure. It often requires changes in roadway parameters, building boarding platforms, new bus depots, as well as creating a priority passage system at intersections with individual vehicles flows. In world practice, the routing of bus rapid transit (hereinafter—BRT) corridors is often based on the criterion of an opinion of transport experts who assess passenger flows and the location of main attraction points. This article describes an algorithm for building BRT corridors based on the criterion of economically viable passenger flow. The method is based on an iterative algorithm built on the principle of passenger flows redistribution over the transport network in the event of a change in its characteristics. Specifically, what changes is the speed of transit in certain areas due to inclusion of the area in a BRT corridor when the area reaches the threshold of economically viable passenger flow. A threshold value of passenger flow for different cities, grouped by population size, is determined on the basis of passenger flow statistics in globally operated BRT systems. The condition for exiting the iterative algorithm can be either the absence of new network areas where an economically viable passenger flow is achieved, or the achievement of 90% of the labor commuting share in the city during the time specified in the urban planning standard. This method can be used to identify new and extend existing BRT corridors in cities with populations from 100 to 2000 thousand people.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Pechkurov & Dmitry Plotnikov & Andrey Gorev & Tatiana Kudryavtseva & Aushra Banite & Angi Skhvediani, 2023. "Development of a Method for Selecting Bus Rapid Transit Corridors Based on the Economically Viable Passenger Flow Criterion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2391-:d:1049817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2391/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2391/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linovski, Orly & Baker, Dwayne Marshall & Manaugh, Kevin, 2018. "Equity in practice? Evaluations of equity in planning for bus rapid transit," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 75-87.
    2. Farhan Haider & Zia ur Rehman & Ammad Hassan Khan & Maryam Ilyas & Inamullah Khan, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of BRT Standard in Decision Support System for Integrated Transportation Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Hongguo Ren & Zhenbao Wang & Yanyan Chen, 2020. "Optimal Express Bus Routes Design with Limited-Stop Services for Long-Distance Commuters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Jesper Bláfoss Ingvardson & Otto Anker Nielsen, 2018. "Effects of new bus and rail rapid transit systems – an international review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 96-116, January.
    5. Zolnik, Edmund J. & Malik, Ammar & Irvin-Erickson, Yasemin, 2018. "Who benefits from bus rapid transit? Evidence from the Metro Bus System (MBS) in Lahore," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 139-149.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Oviedo & Lynn Scholl & Marco Innao & Lauramaria Pedraza, 2019. "Do Bus Rapid Transit Systems Improve Accessibility to Job Opportunities for the Poor? The Case of Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Malik, Bilal Zia & Rehman, Zia ur & Khan, Ammad Hassan & Akram, Waseem, 2021. "Investigating users' travel behaviours and perceptions of single-corridor BRT: Lessons from Lahore," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Victoria Gitelman & Anna Korchatov & Wafa Elias, 2020. "An Examination of the Safety Impacts of Bus Priority Routes in Major Israeli Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Karthik, P.N. & Rathod, Nihesh & Yasodharan, Sarath & Lobo, Wilson & Sahadevan, Ajeesh & Sundaresan, Rajesh & Verma, Pratik, 2023. "Bus priority lane in Bengaluru: A study on its effectiveness and driver stress," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 39-62.
    5. Pan, Meiyu (Melrose) & Wong, Stephen & Tainter, Francis & Woelfel, Steve & Ryan, Alyssa, 2024. "Integrating equity in transportation scenario planning: A systematic review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 85-95.
    6. Yang, Ziqi & Li, Xinghua & Guo, Yuntao & Qian, Xinwu, 2023. "Understanding active transportation accessibility's impacts on polycentric and monocentric cities' housing price," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    7. Khan, Muhammad Salar & Jamil, Kamil & Malik, Ammar A., 2022. "Delivering Urban Mass Transit—The Case of Lahore, Pakistan," SocArXiv 2zj8m, Center for Open Science.
    8. Butler, Alex & Sweet, Matthias, 2020. "No free rides: Winners and losers of the proposed Toronto Transit Commission U-Pass program," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 15-28.
    9. Jukka Heinonen & Michał Czepkiewicz & Áróra Árnadóttir & Juudit Ottelin, 2021. "Drivers of Car Ownership in a Car-Oriented City: A Mixed-Method Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    10. Wojciech Keblowski & Frédéric Dobruszkes & Kobe Boussauw, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/341191, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    11. Qiuju Huang & Shumin Feng & Guosheng Zhang & Yu Zhang & Yong Adilah Shamsul Harumain, 2022. "Commuter Bus Operation Rules under Two Traffic Scenarios and Two Weather Conditions: Naturalistic Driving Study on Vehicle Speed and Clearance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    12. Barkemeyer, Ralf & Young, C. William & Chintakayala, Phani Kumar & Owen, Anne, 2023. "Eco-labels, conspicuous conservation and moral licensing: An indirect behavioural rebound effect," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    13. Tien Dung Khong & Yen Dan Tong & Le Thai Hanh Bui, 2023. "Cost-Benefit Analysis and Model Preference of Public Transportation in Can Tho City, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Gal Amedi, 2023. "The Determinants of the Transit Accessibility Premium," Bank of Israel Working Papers 2023.12, Bank of Israel.
    15. Muhammad Safdar & Arshad Jamal & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi & Muhammad Tauhidur Rahman & Meshal Almoshaogeh, 2022. "Analysis of the Influential Factors towards Adoption of Car-Sharing: A Case Study of a Megacity in a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25, February.
    16. Börjesson, Maria & Fung, Chau Man & Proost, Stef, 2020. "How rural is too rural for transit? Optimal transit subsidies and supply in rural areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Suchi Kapoor Malhotra & Howard White & Nina Ashley O. Dela Cruz & Ashrita Saran & John Eyers & Denny John & Ella Beveridge & Nina Blöndal, 2021. "Studies of the effectiveness of transport sector interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    18. Andrew Sudmant & Vincent Viguié & Quentin Lepetit & Lucy Oates & Abhijit Datey & Andy Gouldson & David Watling, 2021. "Fair weather forecasting? The shortcomings of big data for sustainable development, a case study from Hubballi‐Dharwad, India," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1237-1248, November.
    19. Kębłowski, Wojciech & Dobruszkes, Frédéric & Boussauw, Kobe, 2022. "Moving past sustainable transport studies: Towards a critical perspective on urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 74-83.
    20. Yvonne Hail & Ronald McQuaid, 2021. "The Concept of Fairness in Relation to Women Transport Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2391-:d:1049817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.