IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1855-d1040009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Differences in the Quality of Rural Development in Guangdong Province and Influencing Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao-Jun Wu

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Da-Fang Wu

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Meng-Jue Zhu

    (School of Public Administration, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China)

  • Pei-Fang Ma

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Zhao-Cheng Li

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yi-Xuan Liang

    (School of Geography and Remote Sensing, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Achieving rural revitalization is the aim of building a strong modern socialist country. However, regional heterogeneity exists in rural development in general, and studying regional differences in rural development quality is an important prerequisite for developing specific policies for rural revitalization. This paper takes 20 prefecture-level cities in Guangdong Province as the research objects and constructs a rural-development-quality-evaluation system based on four dimensions: industrial revitalization, rural affluence, social development, and environmental livability; combines the entropy value method, hierarchical analysis method, and TOPSIS to complete the evaluation process; uses a spatial autocorrelation model and cold–hot spot analysis to explore the characteristics of regional heterogeneity of rural development in Guangdong Province; and relies on stepwise regression analysis to clarify the main influencing factors. The results show the following: (1) The average value of rural development quality in the province is 0.342, with “high in the middle and low in the surrounding area” as the main spatial characteristic. (2) The average value of environmental livability dimension is 0.580, and the high-value area is found in the northeastern part of the province. There is an outer circle distribution structure with Dongguan City as the core of the high-value area, and the score gradually decreases outward, while the average value of all other dimensions is less than 0.350. The mean value of all other dimensions is less than 0.350. (3) The social development dimension shows a cold–hot spot distribution of “hot in the northeast and low in the middle”, the rural development quality and other development dimensions show a cold–hot spot spatial pattern of “high value gathering in the middle and low value gathering in the northeast”, and there is no cold spot gathering in the environmental livability dimension. (4) The average collective assets and the construction rate of science-based communities are the main driving factors of rural development, while the coverage rate of service institutions and the Engel coefficient are the main hindering factors. This paper enriches the rural development level measurement system, clarifies the spatial differentiation and main influencing factors of rural development in Guangdong Province, and helps to provide scientific support and a theoretical basis for the differentiated promotion of rural revitalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao-Jun Wu & Da-Fang Wu & Meng-Jue Zhu & Pei-Fang Ma & Zhao-Cheng Li & Yi-Xuan Liang, 2023. "Regional Differences in the Quality of Rural Development in Guangdong Province and Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1855-:d:1040009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1855/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1855/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huiqin Li & Tinghong Guo & Peter Nijkamp & Xuelian Xie & Jingjing Liu, 2020. "Farmers’ Livelihood Adaptability in Rural Tourism Destinations: An Evaluation Study of Rural Revitalization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Yujun Zhou & Jingming Liu & Xiang Kang, 2022. "Market-Driven Rural Construction—A Case Study of Fuhong Town, Chengdu," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Feng, Weilun & Liu, Yansui & Qu, Lulu, 2019. "Effect of land-centered urbanization on rural development: A regional analysis in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Łukasz Lechowski & Angelika Jasion, 2021. "Spatial Accessibility of Primary Health Care in Rural Areas in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Astrida Miceikienė & Laima Skauronė & Ričardas Krikštolaitis, 2021. "Assessment of the Financial Autonomy of Rural Municipalities," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yufeng & Miao, Jiafeng, 2023. "What Determines China’s Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution? An Improved LMDI Decomposition Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    2. Jinkai Li & Jueying Chen & Heguang Liu, 2021. "Sustainable Agricultural Total Factor Productivity and Its Spatial Relationship with Urbanization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Han, Bo & Jin, Xiaobin & Sun, Rui & Li, Hanbing & Liang, Xinyuan & Zhou, Yinkang, 2023. "Understanding land-use sustainability with a systematical framework: An evaluation case of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Sanjib Mondal & Pritam Ghosh & Pratima Rohatgi, 2023. "Village‐level livelihood security: A case study on a wasteland‐dominated forest fringe region of rural India," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 1019-1036, June.
    5. Zhe Zhao & Pengyu Peng & Fan Zhang & Jiayin Wang & Hongxuan Li, 2022. "The Impact of the Urbanization Process on Agricultural Technical Efficiency in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Yi Xiao & Yuantao Liao & Zhe Li & Zhuojun Li & Shaojian Wang, 2023. "Impacts of Land Urbanization on CO 2 Emissions: Policy Implications Based on Developmental Stages," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Weilun Feng & Yurui Li, 2021. "Measuring the Ecological Safety Effects of Land Use Transitions Promoted by Land Consolidation Projects: The Case of Yan’an City on the Loess Plateau of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Movahedi, Reza & Jawanmardi, Sina & Azadi, Hossein & Goli, Imaneh & Viira, Ants-Hannes & Witlox, Frank, 2021. "Why do farmers abandon agricultural lands? The case of Western Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Huxiao Zhu & Xiangjun Ou & Zhen Yang & Yiwen Yang & Hongxin Ren & Le Tang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Forces of Land Urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Yiqun Wu & Yuan Sun & Congyue Zhou & Yonghua Li & Xuanli Wang & Huifang Yu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Carbon Emissions in Mixed-Use Villages: A Sustainable Development Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Fang Wu & Mingyao Gu & Chenming Zhu & Yingna Qu, 2023. "Temporal-Spatial Evolution and Trend Prediction of the Supply Efficiency of Primary Medical Health Service—An Empirical Study Based on Central and Western Regions of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Tan, Kun & Zhao, Xiaoqing & Pu, Junwei & Li, Sinan & Li, Yuhao & Miao, Peipei & Wang, Qian, 2021. "Zoning regulation and development model for water and land resources in the Karst Mountainous Region of Southwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Ying Zhang & Xinyu Xie & Xiaoping Qiu & Zheng Jing & Yongqian Yu & Yan Wang, 2023. "Study on Livelihood Resilience of Rural Residents under the Rural Revitalization Strategy in Ethnic Areas of Western Sichuan, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Yuan, Yuan & Wang, Mingshu & Zhu, Yi & Huang, Xianjin & Xiong, Xuefeng, 2020. "Urbanization’s effects on the urban-rural income gap in China: A meta-regression analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Fang Sun & Jia Li, 2022. "Research on the Development Mechanism of Rural E-Commerce Based on Rooted Theory: A Co-Benefit-Oriented Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Dang, Yuxuan & Zhao, Zhenting & Kong, Xiangbin & Lei, Ming & Liao, Yubo & Xie, Zhen & Song, Wei, 2023. "Discerning the process of cultivated land governance transition in China since the reform and opening-up-- Based on the multiple streams framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    17. Shi, Linna & Wang, Yongsheng, 2021. "Evolution characteristics and driving factors of negative decoupled rural residential land and resident population in the Yellow River Basin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Kaimeng Li & Shuang Gao & Yuantao Liao & Ke Luo & Shaojian Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Development Zones on China’s Urbanization from the Perspectives of the Population, Land, and the Economy," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Lyu, Rongfang & Clarke, Keith C. & Zhang, Jianming & Feng, Junli & Jia, Xuehui & Li, Jijun, 2021. "Dynamics of spatial relationships among ecosystem services and their determinants: Implications for land use system reform in Northwestern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Lu, Xinhai & Li, Yan & Ke, Shangan, 2020. "Spatial distribution pattern and its optimization strategy of China’s overseas farmland investments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1855-:d:1040009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.