IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p1633-d1035629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying Liveability Using Survey Analysis and Machine Learning Model

Author

Listed:
  • Vijayaraghavan Sujatha

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Anna University—University College of Engineering, Ramanathapuram 623513, India)

  • Ganesan Lavanya

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Anna University—University College of Engineering, Ramanathapuram 623513, India)

  • Ramaiah Prakash

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Alagappa Chettiar Government College of Engineering and Technology, Karaikudi 630003, India)

Abstract

Liveability is an abstract concept with multiple definitions and interpretations. This study builds a tangible metric for liveability using responses from a user survey and uses Machine Learning (ML) to understand the importance of different factors of the metric. The study defines the liveability metric as an individual’s willingness to live in their current location for the foreseeable future. Stratified random samples of the results from an online survey conducted were used for the analysis. The different factors that the residents identified as impacting their willingness to continue living in their neighborhood were defined as the “perception features” and their decision itself was defined as the “liveability feature”. The survey data were then used in an ML classification model, which predicted any user’s liveability feature, given their perception features. ‘Shapley Scores’ were then used to quantify the marginal contribution of the perception features on the liveability metric. From this study, the most important actionable features impacting the liveability of a neighborhood were identified as Safety and Access to the Internet/Organic farm products/healthcare/Public transportation. The main motivation of the study is to offer useful insights and a data-driven framework to the local administration and non-governmental organizations for building more liveable communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Vijayaraghavan Sujatha & Ganesan Lavanya & Ramaiah Prakash, 2023. "Quantifying Liveability Using Survey Analysis and Machine Learning Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1633-:d:1035629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/1633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harm Kaal, 2011. "A conceptual history of livability," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 532-547, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Oliveira, Gisliany L.A. & Silva, Ivanovitch & Lima, Luciana & Costa, Daniel G., 2023. "A composite indicator of liveability based on sociodemographic and Uber quality service dimensions: A data-driven approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 97-115.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Badland, Hannah & Pearce, Jamie, 2019. "Liveable for whom? Prospects of urban liveability to address health inequities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 94-105.
    2. AKANMU Ayobami Ademola & GBADAMOSI Kolawole Taofeek & OMOLE Felix Kayode, 2022. "The Nexus between city livability and transportation in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria," Logistics, Supply Chain, Sustainability and Global Challenges, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. David J. Madden, 2014. "Neighborhood as Spatial Project: Making the Urban Order on the Downtown Brooklyn Waterfront," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 471-497, March.
    4. Yang Liu & Jiajun Qiao & Jie Xiao & Dong Han & Tao Pan, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Rural Revitalization and an Improvement Path: A Typical Old Revolutionary Cultural Area as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach & Justus Uitermark, 2018. "Exclusion as urban policy: The Dutch ‘Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(11), pages 2337-2353, August.
    6. Sunmin Jun & Mengying Li & Juchul Jung, 2022. "Air Pollution (PM 2.5 ) Negatively Affects Urban Livability in South Korea and China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. de Oliveira, Gisliany L.A. & Silva, Ivanovitch & Lima, Luciana & Costa, Daniel G., 2023. "A composite indicator of liveability based on sociodemographic and Uber quality service dimensions: A data-driven approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 97-115.
    8. Karine Duplan, 2023. "What Would an Inclusive City for Gender and Sexual Minorities Be Like? You Need to Ask Queer Folx!," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 138-149.
    9. Magdalena Wdowicka & Lidia Mierzejewska & Marta Szejnfeld & Bogusz Modrzewski & Kamila Sikorska-Podyma & Adam Wronkowski & Ewa Lechowska, 2024. "How to Create Healthy, Stress-Resilient Post-Pandemic Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Jenny McArthur & Enora Robin, 2019. "Victims of their own (definition of) success: Urban discourse and expert knowledge production in the Liveable City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1711-1728, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1633-:d:1035629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.