IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16957-d1302661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Mixed Methods to Identify Evaluation Indicators for Green Railway Transportation Operations in China

Author

Listed:
  • Weiya Chen

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Yongzhuo Yu

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Xiaoping Fang

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Ziyue Yuan

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Shiying Tong

    (School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Rail Data Research and Application Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha 410075, China)

Abstract

The transition of China’s railways from aggressive expansion to sustainable development has sparked widespread discussions on green railways. Previous studies have primarily focused on the fundamental aspects of green rail design and construction. However, the green operation phase, one of the most critical stages in the entire lifecycle of railways, has been overlooked. This study used a mixed-method approach, combining systematic review and qualitative analysis, to identify significant environmental, economic, and social evaluation indicators for green railway transportation operations. Through an examination of 123 articles and interviews with four professors in academia, two Planning and Design Institute technicians, one government staff, and one railway practitioner, this study identified 17 key indicators associated with green operations in railways. The results showed that previous studies in the environmental aspect primarily focused on noise pollution, water pollution, solid waste, ecological conservation, and the use of construction materials. In the social part, the main concern is social equality. Green railway operations have the potential to impact social equity through the movement of people and goods, which makes accessibility a preferable evaluation measure. Regarding economic indicators, the influencing factors are more complex (such as regional GDP per capita), making it difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of green railway operations directly. We suggest the inclusion of more economic-related indicators that directly correlate with green operations in railways.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiya Chen & Yongzhuo Yu & Xiaoping Fang & Ziyue Yuan & Shiying Tong, 2023. "Using Mixed Methods to Identify Evaluation Indicators for Green Railway Transportation Operations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16957-:d:1302661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16957/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16957/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Weisheng & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Electrification of rails in China: Its impact on energy conservation and emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Nie, Liang & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2023. "Is high-speed rail heading towards a low-carbon industry? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    3. Jian >Hong Wu & Chris Nash, 2000. "Railway reform in China," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 25-48, January.
    4. Yang, Xuehui & Zhang, Huirong & Lin, Shanlang & Zhang, Jiaping & Zeng, Jianlong, 2021. "Does high-speed railway promote regional innovation growth or innovation convergence?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Weiya Chen & Xiaoqi Shi & Xiaoping Fang & Yongzhuo Yu & Shiying Tong, 2023. "Research Context and Prospect of Green Railways in China Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Akihiro Otsuka, 2022. "Assessment of the improvement in energy intensity by the new high-speed railway in Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 267-282, February.
    7. Ziyang Chen & Xiao Feng & Ziwen He, 2022. "A Key to Stimulate Green Technology Innovation in China: The Expansion of High-Speed Railways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lan, Xiujuan & Hu, Zheneng & Wen, Chuanhao, 2023. "Does the opening of high-speed rail enhance urban entrepreneurial activity? Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. Jin, Peizhen & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Song, Malin, 2021. "Moving towards a sustainable and innovative city: Internal urban traffic accessibility and high-level innovation based on platform monitoring data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    3. Na Li & Haiyan Lu & Yongxin Lv, 2022. "High-Speed Railway Facilities, Intercity Accessibility and Urban Innovation Level—Evidence from Cities in Three Chinese Megacity Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2022. "Government intervention, spillover effect and urban innovation performance: Empirical evidence from national innovative city pilot policy in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Huang, Yan & Ma, Liang & Cao, Jason, 2023. "Exploring spatial heterogeneity in the high-speed rail impact on air quality," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Li, Jing & Yu, Qian & Ma, Ding, 2024. "Does China's high-speed rail network promote inter-city technology transfer? ——A multilevel network analysis based on the electronic information industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 11-24.
    7. Xiao, Wu & Cheng, Andi & Li, Shuai & Jiang, Xiaobin & Ruan, Xuehua & He, Gaohong, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization strategy of steam power system to achieve standard emission and optimal economic by NSGA-Ⅱ," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    8. Ruo-Yu Zhu & Ke-Hu Tan & Xiao-Hui Xin, 2023. "Can the Opening of High-Speed Railway Restrain Corporate Financialization?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Liu, Zhen & Diao, Ziyu & Lu, Yuan, 2024. "Can the opening of high-speed rail boost the reduction of air pollution and carbon emissions? Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Chris Nash, 2011. "Competition and Regulation in Rail Transport," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 33, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Wang, Manyu & Huang, Ying & An, Zidong & Wei, Chu, 2023. "Reforming the world's largest heating system: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    12. Chen, Zhenhua, 2023. "Socioeconomic Impacts of high-speed rail: A bibliometric analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Zhang, Chi & Zeng, Guohong & Wu, Jian & Wei, Shaoyuan & Zhang, Weige & Sun, Bingxiang, 2023. "Integrated optimization of driving strategy and energy management for hybrid diesel multiple units," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    14. Wang, Y.F. & Li, K.P. & Xu, X.M. & Zhang, Y.R., 2014. "Transport energy consumption and saving in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 641-655.
    15. Linna Li & Becky P.Y. Loo, 2017. "Railway Development And Air Patronage In China, 1993–2012: Implications For Low‐Carbon Transport," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 507-522, June.
    16. Fernando Martins & Pedro Moura & Aníbal T. de Almeida, 2022. "The Role of Electrification in the Decarbonization of the Energy Sector in Portugal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-35, February.
    17. Lai, Xiaobing & Yue, Shujing & Guo, Chong & Zhang, Xinhe, 2023. "Does FinTech reduce corporate excess leverage? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 281-299.
    18. Yu, Kemei & Wu, Jianhong & Wang, Kun & Zhang, Anming & Zheng, Shiyuan & Wang, Yixiao & Li, Hongchang, 2023. "Restructuring Chinese railways from a cost-efficient perspective—A hedonic cost function analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    19. Suomalainen, Kiti & Wen, Le & Sheng, Mingyue Selena & Sharp, Basil, 2022. "Climate change impact on the cost of decarbonisation in a hydro-based power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    20. Wang, Cong & Yang, Hangjun & Yuan, Hang, 2018. "The impact of railway reform on corporate export: The case of China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 627-647.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16957-:d:1302661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.