IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i24p16851-d1300336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Synthesis and Environmental Applications of Nanoporous Materials Derived from Coal Fly Ash

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Yuan

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, National Institute of Clean and Low Carbon Energy, Beijing 102211, China
    School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Hao Xu

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yanjun Liu

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Kaiqi Tan

    (School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yixiang Bao

    (State Key Laboratory of Water Resource Protection and Utilization in Coal Mining, National Institute of Clean and Low Carbon Energy, Beijing 102211, China)

Abstract

Coal fly ash (CFA) is the primary solid waste generated by the coal-fired industry, and the predominant treatment methods include accumulation, landfill, and the production of cement-based building materials. However, the availability of these methods is relatively limited, and there is a need for technological upgrades. The extensive accumulation not only leads to environmental pollution but also has detrimental effects on human health. With its loose structure and main chemical components of Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 , CFA is conducive to the synthesis of promising nanoporous materials for applications in adsorption. The use of CFA as a raw material can significantly reduce preparation costs, improve comprehensive utilization efficiency, and manufacture more valuable products, aligning with the current strategy of sustainable development. Currently, the most widely used synthesis method is hydrothermal synthesis. This review focuses on the principles, methods, and influencing factors of synthesis, with particular emphasis on CFA-based mesoporous silica, zeolites, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which have not been systematically reviewed previously. The quality of these synthesized nanoporous materials can be finely adjusted through the synthesis process. A comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each process will be made, and the impact of the synthesis conditions on the synthetic products will be analyzed. Additionally, a brief discussion on the latest research advances in their applications in adsorption will be provided. Finally, relevant challenges and issues have been proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Yuan & Hao Xu & Yanjun Liu & Kaiqi Tan & Yixiang Bao, 2023. "Synthesis and Environmental Applications of Nanoporous Materials Derived from Coal Fly Ash," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16851-:d:1300336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16851/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/24/16851/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, T.Y. & Chiueh, P.T. & Lo, S.L., 2017. "Life-cycle environmental and cost impacts of reusing fly ash," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 255-260.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji Young Eom & Seong Jun Yang & Myung Jin Lee & Yu Ra Yang & Young Min Wie & Ki Gang Lee & Kang Hoon Lee, 2024. "Recycling Fly Ash into Lightweight Aggregate: Life Cycle Assessment and Economic Evaluation of Waste Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Oluwafemi E. Ige & Oludolapo A. Olanrewaju, 2023. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Different Portland Cement Types in South Africa," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:24:p:16851-:d:1300336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.