IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16474-d1292059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coated Paper-Based Packaging Waste: Investigation on Sensorial Properties Affecting the Material Class Perception

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Marinelli

    (Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Flavia Papile

    (Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Barbara Del Curto

    (Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo Da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
    National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (INSTM), Via Giuseppe Giusti 9, 50121 Firenze, Italy)

Abstract

Packaging waste correct sorting hugely impacts fiber-based packaging circularity. Currently, this is more crucial than ever, also due to the increased market share of fiber-based packaging. This study evaluated the relationship between the aesthetic properties and user material sorting actions of lightweight dispersion-coated and uncoated paper substrates. Unlike previous literature, no labeling or graphics were involved in this study, focusing on the physical and aesthetic properties of both coatings and substrates. Untrained panelists participated in a multi-phase (descriptive and hedonic) analysis involving a questionnaire and antonym scales about samples’ visual and tactile properties, which were also characterized. The results highlight a remarkable panelist’s ability to assess the relative gloss and roughness. Perceived roughness and mattness statistically significantly correlated to cellulosic material identification. Moreover, material sorting into the paper recycling stream was statistically significantly regulated by sample mattness, followed by sample roughness. This work suggests that, without any graphic or textual information, the combination of substrate characteristics and coating formulation strongly impacts the packaging aesthetics, hence packaging perception as paper-based material. Consequently, the correct material identification and sorting can be encouraged by proper packaging materials selection and coating development.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Marinelli & Flavia Papile & Barbara Del Curto, 2023. "Coated Paper-Based Packaging Waste: Investigation on Sensorial Properties Affecting the Material Class Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16474-:d:1292059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Hidalgo-Carvajal & Edgar Gutierrez-Franco & Christopher Mejia-Argueta & Helen Suntura-Escobar, 2023. "Out of the Box: Exploring Cardboard Returnability in Nanostore Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Hua Zhang & Zong-Guo Wen, 2014. "Residents’ Household Solid Waste (HSW) Source Separation Activity: A Case Study of Suzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengge Hao & Dongyong Zhang & Stephen Morse, 2020. "Waste Separation Behaviour of College Students under a Mandatory Policy in China: A Case Study of Zhengzhou City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2020. "The Potential of Food Packaging Attributes to Influence Consumers’ Decisions to Sort Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Xuemeng Zhang & Chao Liu & Yuexi Chen & Guanghong Zheng & Yinguang Chen, 2022. "Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11471-11513, October.
    4. Gang Du & Chuanwang Sun, 2015. "Determinants of Electricity Demand in Nonmetallic Mineral Products Industry: Evidence from a Comparative Study of Japan and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2019. "The Role of Food Packaging Design in Consumer Recycling Behavior—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Xingyu Yang & Xiaoyi Chen & Xinyue Xiao & Haode Xi & Shiwei Liu, 2021. "College Students’ Willingness to Separate Municipal Waste and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study in Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Mia Klemenčić & Ivana Bolanča Mirković & Nenad Bolf, 2023. "The Influence of the Production Stages of Cardboard Pharmaceutical Packaging on the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Zhujie Chu & Wenna Wang & Bairong Wang & Jun Zhuang, 2016. "Research on Factors Influencing Municipal Household Solid Waste Separate Collection: Bayesian Belief Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Ying Xu & Sarah Ann Wheeler & Firmin Doko Tchatoka, 2023. "Evaluating policy changes on council waste generation and diversion: Evidence from South Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(4), pages 541-557, October.
    10. Ossama Ahmed Labib & Latifah Binti Abd Manaf & Amir Hamzah Bin Sharaai & Siti Sarah Binti Mohamad Zaid & Muhammed Salisu Khalil, 2023. "The influence of Socio-Psychological Factors on Residents’ Willingness to Practice Sustainable Waste Handling in Dammam City, Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Ossama Ahmed Labib & Latifah Manaf & Amir Hamzah Sharaai & Siti Sarah Mohamad Zaid, 2021. "Understanding the Effect of Internal and External Factors on Households’ Willingness to Sort Waste in Dammam City, Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Worku Adefris & Shimeles Damene & Poshendra Satyal, 2023. "Household practices and determinants of solid waste segregation in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Yalin Yuan & Hisako Nomura & Yoshifumi Takahashi & Mitsuyasu Yabe, 2016. "Model of Chinese Household Kitchen Waste Separation Behavior: A Case Study in Beijing City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Fu Chen & Xiaoxiao Li & Jing Ma & Yongjun Yang & Gang-Jun Liu, 2018. "An Exploration of the Impacts of Compulsory Source-Separated Policy in Improving Household Solid Waste-Sorting in Pilot Megacities, China: A Case Study of Nanjing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Fei, Fan & Qu, Lili & Wen, Zongguo & Xue, Yanyan & Zhang, Huanan, 2016. "How to integrate the informal recycling system into municipal solid waste management in developing countries: Based on a China’s case in Suzhou urban area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 74-86.
    16. Towhid Babazadeh & Haidar Nadrian & Mohammad Mosaferi & Hamid Allahverdipour, 2018. "Identifying Challenges and Barriers to Participating in the Source Separation of Waste Program in Tabriz, Northwest of Iran: A Qualitative Study from the Citizens’ Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Jing Ma & Keith W. Hipel & Mark L. Hanson, 2017. "Public participation in municipal solid waste source-separated collection in Guilin, China: status and influencing factors," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(12), pages 2174-2191, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16474-:d:1292059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.