IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i23p16273-d1287121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Paradox of Privatization in Inland Fisheries Management: Lessons from a Traditional System

Author

Listed:
  • Irkhamiawan Ma’ruf

    (Study Program of Natural Resources and Environmental Management Science, Postgraduate School, IPB University, Kampus IPB Baranangsiang, Bogor 16151, Indonesia
    Study Program of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang, Palembang 30263, Indonesia)

  • Mohammad Mukhlis Kamal

    (Department of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Arif Satria

    (Department of Communication Science and Community Development, Faculty of Human Ecology, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Sulistiono

    (Department of Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

  • Alin Halimatussadiah

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Yudi Setiawan

    (Department of Conservation of Forest Resources and Ecotourism, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia)

Abstract

Privatization, often proposed as a means to regulate natural resource use, sometimes paradoxically leads to overexploitation and social exclusion. Within the unique context of Ogan Komering Ilir (OKI) Regency, Indonesia, the privatization of swamp floodplains and rivers via the “Lelang Lebak, Lebung, Sungai” (L3S) system is a testament to this dilemma. L3S grants auction winners exclusive rights to fish, thereby privatizing common-pool resources. This study delves into the intricacies of the L3S mechanism, highlighting its significance in guiding inland fisheries’ management. Through stakeholder analysis, we pinpoint the crucial actors, as well as their interests, influence, and interrelationships. Our investigation revealed 20 distinct stakeholders, each playing different roles within the L3S framework. Based on their influence and vested interests, these stakeholders are categorized as key players, subjects, context setters, and crowds. This classification aids in discerning potential conflicts, cooperation, and synergies. Effective L3S execution hinges on collaboration, especially with pivotal entities such as fishery services, village and district heads, and village-owned enterprises. Insights gathered during the study indicate that while privatization has streamlined resource distribution, it intensifies overfishing and deepens socioeconomic divisions. This study calls for a harmonious blend of historical insights and modern governance, with a central focus on stakeholder collaboration and community involvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Irkhamiawan Ma’ruf & Mohammad Mukhlis Kamal & Arif Satria & Sulistiono & Alin Halimatussadiah & Yudi Setiawan, 2023. "The Paradox of Privatization in Inland Fisheries Management: Lessons from a Traditional System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16273-:d:1287121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16273/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/23/16273/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pinkerton, Evelyn & Davis, Reade, 2015. "Neoliberalism and the politics of enclosure in North American small-scale fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 303-312.
    2. Eranga K. Galappaththi & James D. Ford & Elena M. Bennett, 2020. "Climate change and adaptation to social-ecological change: the case of indigenous people and culture-based fisheries in Sri Lanka," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 279-300, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirvani Dastgerdi, Ahmadreza & Sargolini, Massimo & Broussard Allred, Shorna & Chatrchyan, Allison Morrill & Drescher, Michael & DeGeer, Christopher, 2022. "Climate change risk reduction in cultural landscapes: Insights from Cinque Terre and Waterloo," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Song, Andrew, 2018. "Reconstructing Governability: How Fisheries Are Made Governable," MarXiv zavwc, Center for Open Science.
    3. Philip A. Loring, 2022. "Regenerative food systems and the conservation of change," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 701-713, June.
    4. Hjorthen, Sofie L. & Sund, Erik R. & Skalická, Věra & Eikemo, Terje Andreas & Getz, Linn Okkenhaug & Krokstad, Steinar, 2022. "Trends in absolute and relative educational inequalities in health during times of labour market restructuring in coastal areas: The HUNT Study, Norway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    5. Jin-Ling Yan & Yong-Jie Xue & Muhammad Mohsin, 2022. "Accessing Occupational Health Risks Posed by Fishermen Based on Fuzzy AHP and IPA Methods: Management and Performance Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Catherine E. Lambert & Jason R. Holley & Katherine A. McComas & Natalie P. Snider & Grace K. Tucker, 2021. "Eroding Land and Erasing Place: A Qualitative Study of Place Attachment, Risk Perception, and Coastal Land Loss in Southern Louisiana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Gavin Melles & Ethmadalage Dineth Perera, 2020. "Resilience Thinking and Strategies to Reclaim Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Cascade Tank-Village System (CTVS) in Sri Lanka," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Joyashree Roy & Anjal Prakash & Shreya Some & Chandni Singh & Rachel Bezner Kerr & Martina Angela Caretta & Cecilia Conde & Marta Rivera Ferre & Corinne Schuster-Wallace & Maria Cristina Tirado-von de, 2022. "Synergies and trade-offs between climate change adaptation options and gender equality: a review of the global literature," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Diosey Ramon Lugo-Morin, 2021. "Global Mapping of Indigenous Resilience Facing the Challenge of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Tsele T. Nthane & Fred Saunders & Gloria L. Gallardo Fernández & Serge Raemaekers, 2020. "Toward Sustainability of South African Small-Scale Fisheries Leveraging ICT Transformation Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Patrick Bresnihan, 2019. "Revisiting neoliberalism in the oceans: Governmentality and the biopolitics of ‘improvement’ in the Irish and European fisheries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(1), pages 156-177, February.
    12. Meg Parsons & Lara Taylor & Roa Crease, 2021. "Indigenous Environmental Justice within Marine Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Indigenous Peoples’ Involvement in Marine Governance and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-33, April.
    13. Bailey, Gino & Ariza, Eduard & Casellas, Antònia, 2022. "Coevolutionary decoupling in artisanal fisher communities: A temporal perspective from Chile," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    14. Bresnihan, Patrick, 2019. "The (Slow) Tragedy of Improvement: Neoliberalism, Fisheries Management & the Institutional Commons," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 210-220.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:23:p:16273-:d:1287121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.