IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15928-d1279873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Individual Carbon Emission Evaluation and Carbon Trading Model for Low-Carbon University Campuses

Author

Listed:
  • Junhong Hao

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Xialin Ye

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Chenfei Yu

    (School of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jiayuan Liu

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yimin Ruan

    (School of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yingxin Zhang

    (School of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

  • Feng Hong

    (School of Control and Computer Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Dongyue Zhang

    (School of Energy Power and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    School of Ethnology and Sociology, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Individual carbon accounting and trading is significant for building and achieving low-/zero-carbon university campuses. This manuscript examines various aspects of individual carbon trading on campus, such as assessing personal carbon emissions, students’ willingness to participate in individual carbon trading on campus, and its influencing factors, policy setting, and emission reduction benefits. Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, this manuscript uses the conditional process analysis method and conducts a questionnaire survey on a university campus in Beijing to evaluate individuals’ carbon emissions on campus and explore their willingness to trade personal carbon. Moreover, a system dynamics approach is adopted to propose a simulation model of individual carbon trading on the campus and assess its feasibility and emission reduction benefits. The results indicate an average annual emission reduction of 8.18% per person, providing a theoretical foundation to implement and promote the individual carbon trading pilot on campus. These findings highlight the potential benefits of individual carbon trading policies that may effectively reduce carbon emissions on university campuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Junhong Hao & Xialin Ye & Chenfei Yu & Jiayuan Liu & Yimin Ruan & Yingxin Zhang & Feng Hong & Dongyue Zhang, 2023. "A Novel Individual Carbon Emission Evaluation and Carbon Trading Model for Low-Carbon University Campuses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15928-:d:1279873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongmei Zhao & Yang Xu & Wei-Chiang Hong & Yi Liang & Dandan Zou, 2021. "Smart Evaluation of Green Campus Sustainability Considering Energy Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Fang, Xingming & Qu, Zitang & Sun, Chuanwang & Wu, Chengkuan & Wei, Jing, 2022. "Public attitude and policy selection of future energy sustainability in China: Evidence of the survey of the college students," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    3. Daoyan Guo & Hong Chen & Ruyin Long & Shaohui Zou, 2021. "Determinants of Residents’ Approach–Avoidance Responses to the Personal Carbon Trading Scheme: An Empirical Analysis of Urban Residents in Eastern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Tan, Xueping & Wang, Xinyu & Zaidi, Syed Haider Ali, 2019. "What drives public willingness to participate in the voluntary personal carbon-trading scheme? A case study of Guangzhou Pilot, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Ani Qi & Zeyu Ji & Yuanchao Gong & Bo Yang & Yan Sun, 2022. "The Impact of the Gain-Loss Frame on College Students’ Willingness to Participate in the Individual Low-Carbon Behavior Rewarding System (ILBRS): The Mediating Role of Environmental Risk Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fanlue Li & Ke He & Run Zhu & Junbiao Zhang & Ming Gao, 2023. "Rural low‐carbon energy development in the information age: Can internet access drive the farmer to participate in personal carbon trading schemes related to bioenergy?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1417-1432, June.
    2. Lei, Heng & Xue, Minggao & Ye, Jing, 2024. "The nexus between ReFi, carbon, fossil energy, and clean energy assets: Quantile time–frequency connectedness and portfolio implications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    3. Daoyan Guo & Xinping Wang & Taozhu Feng & Shuai Han, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Waste Separation Behaviors of Urban Residents in Shaanxi Province during the 14th National Games of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Wang, Zhen & Chu, Erming, 2024. "The path toward urban carbon neutrality: How does the low-carbon city pilot policy stimulate low-carbon technology?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 954-975.
    5. Ana M. Barreiros & Anabela Durão & Ana Galvão & Cristina Matos & Dina Mateus & Ivo Araújo & Luís Neves & Mário Matos & Sandra Mourato, 2023. "Analyzing Green Behavior and the Rational Use of Water in Portuguese Higher Education Campi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Ivo Araújo & Leonel J. R. Nunes & António Curado, 2023. "Preliminary Approach for the Development of Sustainable University Campuses: A Case Study Based on the Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Tao, Yujie & Duan, Maosheng & Deng, Zhe, 2021. "Using an extended theory of planned behaviour to explain willingness towards voluntary carbon offsetting among Chinese consumers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. An, Kangxin & Zhang, Shihui & Huang, Hai & Liu, Yuan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Socioeconomic impacts of household participation in emission trading scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium-based case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    9. Zhongwei Zhu & Tingyu Qian & Lei Liu, 2023. "Evolutionary Simulation of Carbon-Neutral Behavior of Urban Citizens in a “Follow–Drive” Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-28, July.
    10. Alessia Cavaliere & Silvia Pigliafreddo & Elisa De Marchi & Alessandro Banterle, 2020. "Do Consumers Really Want to Reduce Plastic Usage? Exploring the Determinants of Plastic Avoidance in Food-Related Consumption Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Yehui Peng & Jacopo Gaspari & Lia Marchi, 2024. "Exploring Residential Energy Behaviour of the Younger Generation for Sustainable Living: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Guoqiang He & Tao Yu, 2023. "Evaluating the Benefits and Potential of “Plastic Reduction”: A Case Study of College Students in Western China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Yao Li & Shuai Wang, 2023. "Personal emission permit trading scheme: urban spatial equilibrium and planning," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 1239-1259, March.
    14. Tan, Yang & Ying, Xiaoyu & Ge, Jian & Gao, Weijun & Zhang, Li & Wang, Shuai, 2024. "Driving role of perceived psychological factors in households’ low-carbon behaviors: A study based on the Chinese household carbon generalized system of preferences," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    15. Jia Wang & Yangli Gu & Haohang Xin & Xiaomei Wang, 2022. "Influence of Appeal Type and Message Framing on Residents’ Intent to Engage in Pro-Environmental Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Wanyan Li & Jincan Liu, 2024. "Investigating Public Support for the Carbon Generalized System of Preference through the Lens of Protection Motivation Theory and Information Deficit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Daniela Acquadro Maran & Matti Ullah Butt & Tatiana Begotti, 2023. "Pro-Environment Behaviors, Efficacy Beliefs, Perceived Individual and Social Norms: A Questionnaire Survey in a Sample of Young Adults From Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    18. Chen, Feiyu & Chen, Qirui & Hou, Jing & Li, Shanshan, 2023. "Effects of China's carbon generalized system of preferences on low-carbon action: A synthetic control analysis based on text mining," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15928-:d:1279873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.