IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p15753-d1276391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decarbonization in the Automotive Sector: A Holistic Status Quo Analysis of Original Equipment Manufacturer Strategies and Carbon Management Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph Poligkeit

    (Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Sustainable Manufacturing and Life Cycle Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
    Volkswagen AG, Berliner Ring 2, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany)

  • Thomas Fugger

    (Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Sustainable Manufacturing and Life Cycle Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
    Volkswagen AG, Berliner Ring 2, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany)

  • Christoph Herrmann

    (Institute of Machine Tools and Production Technology (IWF), Sustainable Manufacturing and Life Cycle Engineering, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

Abstract

The automotive sector is a significant contributor to global carbon emissions and, as such, to climate change. However, there is currently no publicly available sector-wide insight into the extent to which Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) in the automotive sector have implemented decarbonization strategies and carbon management activities. This paper addresses this issue by collecting and analyzing the implementation status of all OEMs with annual sales of more than 500,000 light-duty vehicles. For this purpose, a structured set of criteria is developed that allows conclusions to be drawn for several areas of corporate carbon management. The analysis shows a sector-wide implementation of decarbonization strategies and carbon management activities. However, significant regional differences in external communication, data transparency and methodological inconsistencies emerge. This study provides both academics and practitioners in the automotive industry with valuable insights into current reporting practices, target setting and communicated mitigation actions. On this basis, scientists can project possible greenhouse gas (GHG) emission pathways, align their research with the focus of practitioners to provide them with science-based data, and work on the methodological inconsistencies. Furthermore, the developed criteria provide a useful toolbox for the holistic analysis of other industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph Poligkeit & Thomas Fugger & Christoph Herrmann, 2023. "Decarbonization in the Automotive Sector: A Holistic Status Quo Analysis of Original Equipment Manufacturer Strategies and Carbon Management Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15753-:d:1276391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15753/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15753/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian Grenz & Moritz Ostermann & Karoline Käsewieter & Felipe Cerdas & Thorsten Marten & Christoph Herrmann & Thomas Tröster, 2023. "Integrating Prospective LCA in the Development of Automotive Components," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Timo Busch & Stefan Lewandowski, 2018. "Corporate Carbon and Financial Performance: A Meta‐analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(4), pages 745-759, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Homroy, Swarnodeep, 2023. "GHG emissions and firm performance: The role of CEO gender socialization," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Trinks, Arjan & Mulder, Machiel & Scholtens, Bert, 2020. "An Efficiency Perspective on Carbon Emissions and Financial Performance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Malgorzata Ulewicz, 2024. "A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Tzouvanas, Panagiotis & Kizys, Renatas & Chatziantoniou, Ioannis & Sagitova, Roza, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in the European manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Su-In Kim & Yujin Kim, 2023. "Climate Risk, Stock Crash Risk, and Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading Scheme: Evidence From Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    6. Birindelli, Giuliana & Miazza, Aline & Paimanova, Viktoriia & Palea, Vera, 2023. "Just “blah blah blah”? Stock market expectations and reactions to COP26," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Juan C. Reboredo & Luis A. Otero González, 2022. "Low carbon transition risk in mutual fund portfolios: Managerial involvement and performance effects," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 950-968, March.
    8. Ammar Ali Gull & Muhammad Atif & Tanveer Ahsan & Imen Derouiche, 2022. "Does waste management affect firm performance? International evidence," Post-Print hal-03866049, HAL.
    9. He, Xiaolong & Wang, Chaoyi & Yang, Xiaowei & Lai, Zhoujing, 2021. "Do enterprise ownership structures affect financial performance in China's power and gas industries?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Włodarczyk, Aneta & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna & Urbański, Mariusz, 2024. "Carbon and financial performance nexus of the heavily polluting companies in the context of resource management during COVID-19 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Addisu A. Lashitew, 2021. "Corporate uptake of the Sustainable Development Goals: Mere greenwashing or an advent of institutional change?," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 184-200, March.
    12. Erli Dan & Jianfei Shen & Yiwei Guo, 2023. "Corporate Sustainable Growth, Carbon Performance, and Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure: New Panel Data Evidence for Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Timo Busch & Matthew Johnson & Thomas Pioch, 2022. "Corporate carbon performance data: Quo vadis?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 350-363, February.
    14. Best, Rohan & Marrone, Mauricio & Linnenluecke, Martina, 2023. "Meta-analysis of the role of equity dimensions in household solar panel adoption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán & Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez, 2024. "Corporate governance and financial performance: Reframing their relationship in the context of climate change," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1493-1509, May.
    16. Yenny Naranjo Tuesta & Cristina Crespo Soler & Vicente Ripoll Feliu, 2020. "The Influence of Carbon Management on the Financial Performance of European Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Zhang, Xinhua & Zhang, Qianqian & Dai, Zhifeng & Zhang, Xiaotong, 2023. "The impact of carbon markets on the financial performance of power producers: Evidence based on China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    18. Suchismita Ghosh & Ritu Pareek & Tarak Nath Sahu, 2024. "Do Carbon Performance and Disclosure Practices Effect Companies’ Financial Performance: A Non-Linear Perspective," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 31(3), pages 733-754, September.
    19. Caby, Jérôme & Ziane, Ydriss & Lamarque, Eric, 2022. "The impact of climate change management on banks profitability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 412-422.
    20. Davood Omidzadeh & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi & Ali Bozorgi-Amiri & Mohammad Daneshvar Kakhki, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainability Attributes in New Product Design Insights from Automotive Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-31, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:15753-:d:1276391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.