Author
Listed:
- Harald G. Zechmeister
(Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria)
- Leonie Möslinger
(Research Unit of Ecological Building Technologies, Institute of Material Technology, Building Physics and Building Ecology, Faculty of Civil- and Environmental Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/207-3, 1040 Vienna, Austria)
- Azra Korjenic
(Research Unit of Ecological Building Technologies, Institute of Material Technology, Building Physics and Building Ecology, Faculty of Civil- and Environmental Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/207-3, 1040 Vienna, Austria)
- Erich Streit
(Research Unit of Ecological Building Technologies, Institute of Material Technology, Building Physics and Building Ecology, Faculty of Civil- and Environmental Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/207-3, 1040 Vienna, Austria)
- Abdulah Sulejmanovski
(Research Unit of Ecological Building Technologies, Institute of Material Technology, Building Physics and Building Ecology, Faculty of Civil- and Environmental Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/207-3, 1040 Vienna, Austria)
- Patrick Niklas Frank
(Eiria GmbH, 1020 Vienna, Austria)
- Esther Hummel
(Eiria GmbH, 1020 Vienna, Austria)
Abstract
There is an increasing demand for green plant walls in indoor environments because of their multifaced benefits, such as aesthetic appeal, indoor air quality improvement, or psychological well-being. Mosses are believed to be excellent for these walls due to their easy application and maintenance. However, so far there is no evidence for their indoor survival. In this study, we tested the moss species Hypnum cupressiforme , Bryachythecium rutabulum , Eurrhynchium angustirete , Thuidium tamariscinum , Streblotrichum convolutum , Syntrichia ruralis , and Ceratodon purpureus for indoor use in living moss walls. We evaluated their vitality through the monitoring of leaf coloration over a twelve month period, subjecting them to varying temperature ranges (14–20 °C), humidity levels (60–100%), and diverse irrigation methods (drip and spray irrigation, 300–1500 mL per day) within controlled climate chambers. Depending on the combination of these variables, mosses survived up to six months. Hypnum cupressiforme and Ceratodon purpureus performed best. However, as the time span of survival was limited, the use of living mosses for indoor purposes at the current stage cannot be recommended. An additional problem is that the requisition of living material such as in the culturing of moss under horticultural conditions is difficult and harvesting from natural environments is detrimental to most habitats.
Suggested Citation
Harald G. Zechmeister & Leonie Möslinger & Azra Korjenic & Erich Streit & Abdulah Sulejmanovski & Patrick Niklas Frank & Esther Hummel, 2023.
"Viability of Living Moss for Indoor Green Walls: A Study on Temperature, Humidity, and Irrigation,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-18, November.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15625-:d:1274170
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Eerika Finell & Jouko Nätti, 2019.
"The Combined Effect of Poor Perceived Indoor Environmental Quality and Psychosocial Stressors on Long-Term Sickness Absence in the Workplace: A Follow-Up Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
- Mohammad Arar & Chuloh Jung, 2021.
"Improving the Indoor Air Quality in Nursery Buildings in United Arab Emirates,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15625-:d:1274170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.