IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i21p15580-d1273294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competencies and Capabilities for the Management of Sustainable Rural Development Projects in the Value Chain: Perception from Small and Medium-Sized Business Agents in Jauja, Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Ronald Jiménez Aliaga

    (Grupo de Investigación Sistemas Productivos Sostenibles en Altura (SIPSA), Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Jr. 28 de Julio s/n, Jauja 12150, Peru
    Planificación y Gestión Sostenible del Desarrollo Rural-Local (GESPLAN), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avda Puerta de Hierro 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Ignacio De los Ríos-Carmenado

    (Planificación y Gestión Sostenible del Desarrollo Rural-Local (GESPLAN), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avda Puerta de Hierro 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Amparo Elena Huamán Cristóbal

    (Grupo de Investigación Sistemas Productivos Sostenibles en Altura (SIPSA), Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Jr. 28 de Julio s/n, Jauja 12150, Peru)

  • Hélida Aliaga Balbín

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Administración, Universidad Nacional del Centro del Peru, Av. Mariscal Castilla N° 3909, Huancayo 12006, Peru)

  • Alexander Martín Marroquín Heros

    (Grupo de Investigación Sistemas Productivos Sostenibles en Altura (SIPSA), Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Jr. 28 de Julio s/n, Jauja 12150, Peru)

Abstract

The guinea pig value chain in Jauja, Peru, has been developed through the application of productive projects, institutional strengthening, and implementation of the Principles of Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems (CFS-RAI). Given the smallholding conditions of the Jauja territory and the proliferation of commercial guinea pig breeding, the actors in this chain constitute a key human capital for development. To improve the performance of the actors in the sustainable rural development of the territory of Jauja, Peru, the research carried out an evaluation of the competencies and capabilities for project management in 46 actors linked to the business programme on the CFS-RAI Principles, representing 1094 people in the guinea pig value chain in Jauja, using the Working With People (WWP) model and empirical instruments based on the Octagon method, project management competence evaluation, performance evaluation carried out by experts, attitudinal evaluation. and the Business Model Canvas. The results have helped to structure the actors of the value chain, who show an intermediate mastery of project management competencies (2.73/5), institutional capabilities in development (2.89/7), and a growing organisational management performance (26.2/100). In addition, trust and proactivity have been generated among the actors in the chain, with an interest in continuing with the implementation of the CFS-RAI Principles in order to achieve sustainability in their productive projects with commercial innovation. The results have allowed us to generate the design of an innovative programme for the development of competencies, which balances the three dimensions of project management competencies (perspective, people, and practice), as defined by the International Project Management Association (IPMA), in connection with the CFS-RAI Principles. Both processes complement the strengthening of human capital in agrifood value chains through sustainable project management and contributing to sustainable development in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronald Jiménez Aliaga & Ignacio De los Ríos-Carmenado & Amparo Elena Huamán Cristóbal & Hélida Aliaga Balbín & Alexander Martín Marroquín Heros, 2023. "Competencies and Capabilities for the Management of Sustainable Rural Development Projects in the Value Chain: Perception from Small and Medium-Sized Business Agents in Jauja, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-26, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15580-:d:1273294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/21/15580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Javier Serrano & Javier Esparcia, 2023. "Diagnosis of Rural Development Processes Based on the Stock of Social Capital and Social Networks: Approach from E-I Index," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    3. Sousa, Joana & Soares, Isabel, 2023. "Benefits and barriers concerning demand response stakeholder value chain: A systematic literature review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Bruno Revesz & Carolina Trivelli & Javier Escobal, 2009. "Desarrollo rural en la sierra. Aportes para el debate," Diagnóstico y propuesta, Consorcio de Investigación Económica y Social.
    5. Henk Berg & Suzanne Phillips & Marcel Dicke & Marjon Fredrix, 2020. "Impacts of farmer field schools in the human, social, natural and financial domain: a qualitative review," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1443-1459, December.
    6. Klarin Tomislav, 2018. "The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 21(1), pages 67-94, May.
    7. Adolfo Cazorla-Montero & Ignacio De los Ríos-Carmenado, 2023. "From “Putting the Last First” to “Working with People” in Rural Development Planning: A Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Years of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Dominik Fischer, 2019. "Relational Leadership And Regional Development: A Case Study On New Agriculture Ventures In Uganda," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(02), pages 1-33, June.
    9. Elena Giovannoni & Giacomo Fabietti, 2013. "What Is Sustainability? A Review of the Concept and Its Applications," Springer Books, in: Cristiano Busco & Mark L. Frigo & Angelo Riccaboni & Paolo Quattrone (ed.), Integrated Reporting, edition 127, chapter 2, pages 21-40, Springer.
    10. William J. Coffey & Mario Polèse, 1984. "The Concept Of Local Development: A Stages Model Of Endogenous Regional Growth," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Albertus, Michael & Espinoza, Mauricio & Fort, Ricardo, 2020. "Land reform and human capital development: Evidence from Peru," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    12. Manolis Manioudis & Giorgos Meramveliotakis, 2022. "Broad strokes towards a grand theory in the analysis of sustainable development: a return to the classical political economy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 866-878, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ginevra Malta & Fulvio Plescia & Stefania Zerbo & Maria Gabriella Verso & Serena Matera & Alenka Skerjanc & Emanuele Cannizzaro, 2024. "Work and Environmental Factors on Job Burnout: A Cross-Sectional Study for Sustainable Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Rui Li & Xin Chen, 2022. "Reverse Logistics Network Design under Disruption Risk for Third-Party Logistics Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Khodran Alzahrani & Mubashar Ali & Muhammad Imran Azeem & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi, 2023. "Efficacy of Public Extension and Advisory Services for Sustainable Rice Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, May.
    4. Shuvo Dip Datta & Bassam A. Tayeh & Ibrahim Y. Hakeem & Yazan I. Abu Aisheh, 2023. "Benefits and Barriers of Implementing Building Information Modeling Techniques for Sustainable Practices in the Construction Industry—A Comprehensive Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Kai Xu, 2023. "Challenges, Opportunities and Future Paths: Environmental Governance of Big Data Initiatives in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Gantian Zheng & Weiwei Wang & Chang Jiang & Fan Jiang, 2023. "Can Rural Industrial Convergence Improve the Total Factor Productivity of Agricultural Environments: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Andrei Coca & Manuela Rozalia Gabor & Irina Olimpia Susanu, 2023. "Do Innovation Metrics Reflect Sustainable Policy Making in Europe? A Comparative Study Case on the Carpathian and Alpine Mountain Regions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, March.
    8. Juan Milán-García & Juan Uribe-Toril & José Luis Ruiz-Real & Jaime de Pablo Valenciano, 2019. "Sustainable Local Development: An Overview of the State of Knowledge," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Biaowen Xu & Xueli Chen, 2024. "Industrial Agglomeration, Land Consolidation, and Agricultural Energy Inefficiency in China: An Analysis Using By-Production Technology and Simultaneous Equations Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Weisheng Mao & Yexi Zhong, 2024. "The Influence of Demand-Based Policy Instruments on Urban Innovation Quality—Evidence from 269 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Meqbel M. Aliedan & Mansour A. Alyahya & Ibrahim A. Elshaer & Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih, 2023. "Who Is Going Green? Determinants of Green Investment Intention in the Saudi Food Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Can Li & Qi He & Han Ji & Shengguo Yu & Jiao Wang, 2023. "Reexamining the Impact of Global Value Chain Participation on Regional Economic Growth: New Evidence Based on a Nonlinear Model and Spatial Spillover Effects with Panel Data from Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-31, September.
    13. Azam Ghezelbash & Jay Liu & Seyed Hamed Fahimifard & Vahid Khaligh, 2024. "Exploring the Influence of the Digital Economy on Energy, Economic, and Environmental Resilience: A Multinational Study across Varied Carbon Emission Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Vivek Arulnathan & Mohammad Davoud Heidari & Maurice Doyon & Eric P. H. Li & Nathan Pelletier, 2022. "Economic Indicators for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Going beyond Life Cycle Costing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    15. Ali Yeganeh & Mahdi Parvizi Amineh & Alireza Shadman & Sandile Charles Shongwe & Seyed Mojtaba Mohasel, 2023. "Combination of Sequential Sampling Technique with GLR Control Charts for Monitoring Linear Profiles Based on the Random Explanatory Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-21, March.
    16. Adolf Akwei Acquaye & Fred Amofa Yamoah & Taofeeq Ibn-Mohammed & Enoch Quaye & David Eshun Yawson, 2023. "Equitable Global Value Chain and Production Network as a Driver for Enhanced Sustainability in Developing Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Xiaojing Zhao & Xuke Li & Guoqu Deng & Yanling Xi, 2023. "Decoupling Relationship between Resource Environment and High-Quality Economic Development in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Chao Wu & Ziyu Liu & Jinquan Liu & Mingze Du, 2022. "Nonlinear Effects of Economic Policy Uncertainty Shocks on Carbon Emissions in China: Evidence from Province-Level Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Chun-Chih Chen & Yu-Shing Chang, 2024. "Leveraging Circular Economy Metrics for Data-Driven Forecasting of Solid Waste Production in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    20. Yupan Zhao & Xiaofeng Zhao & Jielun Yang, 2024. "Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors Between Digital Village Development and Agricultural and Rural Modernization: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:21:p:15580-:d:1273294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.