IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15116-d1264262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application and Performance Evaluation of Industrial Internet Platform in Power Generation Equipment Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Jia

    (School of Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Junfeng Wang

    (School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Xin Han

    (Dongfang Electric R&D Center, Chengdu 611731, China)

  • Haiqi Tang

    (School of Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Xiaoling Xiao

    (School of Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

Abstract

The development and application of the industrial Internet platform (IIP) has brought enterprises huge benefits, such as improving the efficiency of resource management and equipment maintenance, achieving the precipitation and reuse of industrial knowledge, and enhancing the development ability of industrial APPs, etc. Therefore, in order to accelerate the application of the IIP, promote the digital transformation of enterprises, and enhance the application effect of the IIP, it is necessary to evaluate the application level and performance of the enterprise IIP. In this paper, taking the IIP in the power generation equipment industry as the research object, the background, architecture, and implementation process of the platform is described, and an evaluation method is proposed. First, a third-level evaluation index system is proposed via reference analysis and the Delphi method from four dimensions—platform basic condition, platform technology capability, platform application service capability, and platform input–output capability—and a total of sixty-five bottom indexes are designed in particular. Then, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm are used to determine the weights of indexes, where FAHP is used to construct a fuzzy judgment matrix and PSO is adopted to adjust the consistency of the fuzzy judgment matrix in the FAHP. Finally, through the weights of indexes and questionnaire scores, the evaluation results are obtained, and the application level and performance of the IIP in the power generation equipment industry is analyzed. Through analysis, the important indexes that have a significant influence on the evaluation are determined, and the weaknesses that need to be enhanced are also pointed out, which can guide enterprises to make targeted improvements on the IIP in the power generation equipment industry so as to ensure the sustainable development of the power generation equipment industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Jia & Junfeng Wang & Xin Han & Haiqi Tang & Xiaoling Xiao, 2023. "Application and Performance Evaluation of Industrial Internet Platform in Power Generation Equipment Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15116-:d:1264262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    2. Javier Reig-Mullor & David Pla-Santamaria & Ana Garcia-Bernabeu, 2020. "Extended Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (E-FAHP): A General Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Jianjia He & Xuchen Liu, 2023. "Study on the Impact and Mechanism of Industrial Internet Pilot on Digital Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jelena Lukić & Mirjana Misita & Dragan D. Milanović & Ankica Borota-Tišma & Aleksandra Janković, 2022. "Determining the Risk Level in Client Analysis by Applying Fuzzy Logic in Insurance Sector," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Penglong Wang & Yao Wei & Fanglei Zhong & Xiaoyu Song & Bao Wang & Qinhua Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Agricultural Water Resources Carrying Capacity and Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Townships in the Arid Region of Northwest China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Anis Assad Neto & Jessyca Sampaio & Silvana Pereira Detro & Fernando Deschamps & Eduardo Alves Portela Santos & Eduardo de Freitas Rocha Loures, 2021. "Reconciling process flexibility and standardization: a case study in the automotive industry," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 507-524, December.
    4. Javier Velázquez & Javier Infante & Inmaculada Gómez & Ana Hernando & Derya Gülçin & Fernando Herráez & Víctor Rincón & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Walkability under Climate Pressure: Application to Three UNESCO World Heritage Cities in Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Rui Guo & Zhenyong Wu, 2023. "Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12273-12301, November.
    6. Heyong Wang & Long Gu & Ming Hong, 2024. "The Development Status of the Manufacturing Industry and the Impact of Digital Characteristics from the Perspective of Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Paweł Karczmarek & Witold Pedrycz & Adam Kiersztyn, 2021. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in a Graphical Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 463-481, April.
    8. Sudipa Choudhury & Apu Kumar Saha & Mrinmoy Majumder, 2020. "Optimal location selection for installation of surface water treatment plant by Gini coefficient-based analytical hierarchy process," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4073-4099, June.
    9. Kasin Ransikarbum & Wattana Chanthakhot & Tony Glimm & Jettarat Janmontree, 2023. "Evaluation of Sourcing Decision for Hydrogen Supply Chain Using an Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Tool," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Ziad M. Ali & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Ahmed I. Omar & Bahaa Saad Mahmoud, 2022. "Economical-Environmental-Technical Operation of Power Networks with High Penetration of Renewable Energy Systems Using Multi-Objective Coronavirus Herd Immunity Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-43, April.
    11. Nishat Alam Choudhary & Shalabh Singh & Tobias Schoenherr & M. Ramkumar, 2023. "Risk assessment in supply chains: a state-of-the-art review of methodologies and their applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 322(2), pages 565-607, March.
    12. Lázaro V. Cremades & Lluc Canals Casals, 2022. "Analysis of the Future of Mobility: The Battery Electric Vehicle Seems Just a Transitory Alternative," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Hong Li & Zilin Chen, 2022. "A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework to Assess the Sustainable Development of Schools within a University: Application to a Chinese University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, August.
    14. Marcin Nowak & Rafał Mierzwiak & Marcin Butlewski, 2020. "Occupational risk assessment with grey system theory," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(2), pages 717-732, June.
    15. Gerda Ana Melnik-Leroy & Gintautas Dzemyda, 2021. "How to Influence the Results of MCDM?—Evidence of the Impact of Cognitive Biases," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-25, January.
    16. Xiaojuan Zhao & Yunhua Liu, 2020. "Empirical prediction of patent pledge financing of pharmaceutical enterprises—A case study in Jiangsu China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
    17. Teodora M. Șoimoșan & Ligia M. Moga & Livia Anastasiu & Daniela L. Manea & Aurica Căzilă & Čedomir Zeljković, 2021. "Overall Efficiency of On-Site Production and Storage of Solar Thermal Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Germán Álvarez-López & Alejandra María Múnera & Juan G. Villegas, 2023. "Multicriteria Decision-Making Tools for the Selection of Biomasses as Supplementary Cementitious Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Katharina Gompf & Marzia Traverso & Jörg Hetterich, 2021. "Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Introduce Weights to Social Life Cycle Assessment of Mobility Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-10, January.
    20. Tianqi Zhang & Yue Zhou & Ming Li & Haoran Zhang & Tong Wang & Yu Tian, 2022. "Impacts of Urbanization on Drainage System Health and Sustainable Drainage Recommendations for Future Scenarios—A Small City Case in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15116-:d:1264262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.