IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p15105-d1264142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Audio-Visual Environmental Factors on Emotion Perception of Campus Walking Spaces in Northeastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuyao Ma

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Jun Zhang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Xudong Yang

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

In the context of urban sustainable development and the creation of pedestrian-friendly campus environments, optimizing campus walking spaces has emerged as a central focus in urban planning research. Presently, research in pedestrian environments predominantly adopts a macroscopic perspective, offering limited insights into pedestrians’ subjective experiences and emotional perceptions at a micro level. Therefore, this study conducted on-site experiments in 21 walking spaces across three campuses, utilizing image semantic analysis, multifunctional sound level meter, wearable electrocardiography devices, and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to collect data separately on audio-visual environmental factors and pedestrians’ emotional states. This study’s findings revealed significant correlations ( p < 0.01) among factors such as the Green Visual Index, Spatial Enclosure Index, Sky Visibility Index, Spatial feasibility Index, and Equivalent Continuous A-weighted Sound Pressure Level with physiological and psychological alterations in pedestrians’ emotions. Additionally, the various proportions of audio-visual environmental factors also exerted significant influences on emotions ( p < 0.05). The relevant conclusions can provide a reference for optimizing the audio-visual environment of walking space and promoting the sustainable development of the campus. In future research, the effects of audio-visual environments on both emotional and physiological indicators, as well as subjective evaluations, can be explored further.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuyao Ma & Jun Zhang & Xudong Yang, 2023. "Effects of Audio-Visual Environmental Factors on Emotion Perception of Campus Walking Spaces in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15105-:d:1264142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soongbong Lee & Myungjoo Han & Kyoungah Rhee & Bumjoon Bae, 2021. "Identification of Factors Affecting Pedestrian Satisfaction toward Land Use and Street Type," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Marija Jevtic & Vlatka Matkovic & Milica Paut Kusturica & Catherine Bouland, 2022. "Build Healthier: Post-COVID-19 Urban Requirements for Healthy and Sustainable Living," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Regine Gerike & Caroline Koszowski & Bettina Schröter & Ralph Buehler & Paul Schepers & Johannes Weber & Rico Wittwer & Peter Jones, 2021. "Built Environment Determinants of Pedestrian Activities and Their Consideration in Urban Street Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yibang Zhang & Yukun Zou & Zhenjun Zhu & Xiucheng Guo & Xin Feng, 2022. "Evaluating Pedestrian Environment Using DeepLab Models Based on Street Walkability in Small and Medium-Sized Cities: Case Study in Gaoping, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Sangwan Lee, 2022. "Satisfaction with the Pedestrian Environment and Its Relationship to Neighborhood Satisfaction in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, July.
    3. Maddalena Buffoli & Silvia Mangili & Stefano Capolongo & Andrea Brambilla, 2022. "Explorative Study on Urban Public Space Renovation during COVID-19: Test of a Visual Web-Based Survey about the City of Saint German en Laye, France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    4. Mazzulla, Gabriella & Eboli, Laura & Forciniti, Carmen, 2024. "Do women perceive pedestrian path attractiveness differently from men?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    5. Mitropoulos, Lambros & Karolemeas, Christos & Tsigdinos, Stefanos & Vassi, Avgi & Bakogiannis, Efthimios, 2023. "A composite index for assessing accessibility in urban areas: A case study in Central Athens, Greece," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    6. Jiyun Lee & Donghyun Kim & Jina Park, 2022. "A Machine Learning and Computer Vision Study of the Environmental Characteristics of Streetscapes That Affect Pedestrian Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Shereen Wael & Abeer Elshater & Samy Afifi, 2022. "Mapping User Experiences around Transit Stops Using Computer Vision Technology: Action Priorities from Cairo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Le Zhang & Xiaoxiao Xu & Yanlong Guo, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Implementation Effect of Commercial Street Quality Improvement Based on AHP-Entropy Weight Method—Taking Hefei Shuanggang Old Street as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Martin Loidl & Dana Kaziyeva & Robin Wendel & Claudia Luger-Bazinger & Matthias Seeber & Charalampos Stamatopoulos, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Digital, Situation-Aware Nudging for Promoting Sustainable Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Carmen Lizárraga & Cathaysa Martín-Blanco & Isabel Castillo-Pérez & Jorge Chica-Olmo, 2022. "Do University Students’ Security Perceptions Influence Their Walking Preferences and Their Walking Activity? A Case Study of Granada (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    11. Cheranchery, Munavar Fairooz & Krishnan, Meenu G & A A, Alfiya & Nanda V S, Parvathy & Krishna A, Akhila & Samuel, Albin, 2024. "A user perception based approach to derive policy intervention areas for enhancing walkability of cities: Experience in Kerala, India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 70-80.
    12. Eun Jung Kim & Suin Jin, 2023. "Walk Score and Neighborhood Walkability: A Case Study of Daegu, South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Zhaoyue Qin & Yiming Chen & Yue Yan & Yi Huang, 2024. "Influencer Marketing Platforms’ Effect on Light Meal Purchase Intention and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-20, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:15105-:d:1264142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.