IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i20p14685-d1256812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Archaeological Science and Experimental Archaeology Can Inform Sustainable Innovative Craft

Author

Listed:
  • Veronica Testolini

    (Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy)

  • Lenore Thompson

    (University Research and Knowledge Exchange Office, University of Derby, Kedleston Road, Derby DE22 1GB, UK)

  • Cristina Lemorini

    (Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy)

Abstract

This paper provides an example of how combining archaeological analysis of ancient materials with current technological needs can lead to new and innovative products designed to promote sustainability within the heritage craft sector. The project behind this paper, RecRAAFT, promoted activities where potters collaborated with archaeologists to create prototypes of sustainable ceramic objects. Potters applied ancient manufacturing techniques and work practices, following interpreted steps of past production methods. Artisans aimed to produce pieces that appeal to the public while reducing their reliance on the global supply chain, promoting a more sustainable consumer culture. Once these processes were understood, experimentation that incorporated public engagement activities allowed artisans to utilise their experimental craft practice to educate people about sustainable production and consumption. RecRAAFT worked to create synergistic relationships between artisans, researchers, and local communities to inspire sustainable design and to connect the public with their local heritage and each other. The aim is to inspire craft practitioners and the public to make responsible choices about their personal consumption, subsequently supporting a fairer economy and healthy craft working environment while also addressing issues related to the climate crisis and long-term purchasing sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronica Testolini & Lenore Thompson & Cristina Lemorini, 2023. "Archaeological Science and Experimental Archaeology Can Inform Sustainable Innovative Craft," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14685-:d:1256812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14685/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/14685/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasilis Avdikos & Janet Merkel, 2020. "Supporting open, shared and collaborative workspaces and hubs: recent transformations and policy implications," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 348-357, July.
    2. Eduardo Cejuela & Vicente Negro & Jose María Del Campo & Mario Martín-Antón & M. Dolores Esteban & Jose Santos López-Gutiérrez, 2018. "Recent History, Types, and Future of Modern Caisson Technology: The Way to More Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Merrell & Frances Rowe & Paul Cowie & Menelaos Gkartzios, 2021. "‘Honey pot’ rural enterprise hubs as micro-clusters: Exploring their role in creativity-led rural development," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 589-605, November.
    2. Eduardo Cejuela & Vicente Negro & Jose María del Campo, 2020. "Evaluation and Optimization of the Life Cycle in Maritime Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Nina Thornton & Martin Engert & Andreas Hein & Helmut Krcmar, 2023. "Finding new purpose for vacancies in rural areas: a taxonomy of coworking space business models," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 1395-1423, September.
    4. Fang Zhao & Catherine Prentice & Joseph Wallis & Arvind Patel & Marie-France Waxin, 2020. "An integrative study of the implications of the rise of coworking spaces in smart cities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 8(2), pages 467-486, December.
    5. Carolina Pacchi & Nicola Francesco Dotti & Mariachiara Barzotto, 2022. "New working spaces: Policy perspectives before and after the covid-19 pandemic," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/371915, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent, 2021. "What Do We Know about Co-Working Spaces? Trends and Challenges Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-30, January.
    7. Domenico Berdicchia & Fulvio Fortezza & Giovanni Masino, 2023. "The key to happiness in collaborative workplaces. Evidence from coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1213-1242, May.
    8. Irene Manzini Ceinar & Ilaria Mariotti, 2021. "Teleworking In Post-Pandemic Times:May Local Coworking Spaces Be The Future Trend?," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 15(1), pages 52-76, JUNE.
    9. Ian Merrell & Anita Füzi & Emma Russell & Gary Bosworth, 2021. "How rural coworking hubs can facilitate well-being through the satisfaction of key psychological needs," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 606-626, November.
    10. Ryszard Dachowski & Katarzyna Gałek-Bracha, 2024. "Determination of the Occurrence of Negative Impacts during Lowering of Sinking Wells Using the Fuzzy TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Vasilis Avdikos & Antigoni Papageorgiou, 2021. "Public support for collaborative workspaces: Dispersed help to a place-based phenomenon?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 669-682, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:20:p:14685-:d:1256812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.