IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i1p793-d1022415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact and Internal Mechanism of Environmental Decentralization on Green Total Factor Production

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Luo

    (Department of Economics, Nanchang Hangkong University, Fenghe South Avenue 696, Nanchang 330063, China)

  • Zhenhai Liu

    (Department of Economics, Nanchang Hangkong University, Fenghe South Avenue 696, Nanchang 330063, China)

  • Sichao Mai

    (Department of Economics, Nanchang Hangkong University, Fenghe South Avenue 696, Nanchang 330063, China)

Abstract

Since the emergence of environmental federalism theory in the 1960s, the empirical research on it has been pursued by scholars, mainly focusing on whether a country’s environmental regulation should be centralized or decentralized. For a long time, countries have been actively exploring and putting environmental governance systems into practice for themselves, especially at present, in the face of multiple constraints of resources, environment, sustainable development power and other factors. How to build an appropriate environmental governance system and promote the level of green development by encouraging enterprises’ technological innovation is a practical problem to be solved urgently. Based on this, this paper constructs a new research framework of environmental decentralization—technological innovation—green total factor productivity (GTFP) and investigates the effect and mechanism of environmental decentralization on GTFP. The results show that environmental decentralization can reduce the quality of environmental information disclosure and inhibit the innovative output of enterprises, ultimately leading to the decrease of GTFP. Environmental decentralization has a spatial spillover effect on GTFP, which can promote GTFP in neighboring areas. This paper tries to enrich the research results of traditional environmental federalism theory, the “Porter Hypothesis”, and growth pole theory, and it provides a solution to enterprises’ financing constraint problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Luo & Zhenhai Liu & Sichao Mai, 2023. "The Impact and Internal Mechanism of Environmental Decentralization on Green Total Factor Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:793-:d:1022415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/793/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/793/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Peng, Yu-Lu & Ma, Chao-Qun & Shen, Bo, 2017. "Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 18-28.
    2. Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Why Is Pollution from US Manufacturing Declining? The Roles of Environmental Regulation, Productivity, and Trade," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(12), pages 3814-3854, December.
    3. Chiara Franco & Giovanni Marin, 2017. "The Effect of Within-Sector, Upstream and Downstream Environmental Taxes on Innovation and Productivity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 66(2), pages 261-291, February.
    4. Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu & Ren, Siyu, 2020. "How do environmental regulation and environmental decentralization affect green total factor energy efficiency: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Meng, Jia & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2022. "Corporate Environmental Information Disclosure and Investor Response: Empirical Evidence from China's Capital Market," FEEM Working Papers 317842, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Stefania Lovo, 2018. "Effect of Environmental Decentralization on Polluting Firms in India," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(1), pages 55-94.
    7. Wu, Peng & Wang, Yiqing & Chiu, Yung-ho & Li, Ying & Lin, Tai-Yu, 2019. "Production efficiency and geographical location of Chinese coal enterprises - undesirable EBM DEA," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Dechezleprêtre, Antoine & Kozluk, Tomasz & Kruse, Tobias & Nachtigall, Daniel & de Serres, Alain, 2019. "Do Environmental and Economic Performance Go Together? A Review of Micro-level Empirical Evidence from the Past Decade or So," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 13(1-2), pages 1-118, April.
    9. Sjöberg, Eric & Xu, Jing, 2018. "An Empirical Study of US Environmental Federalism: RCRA Enforcement From 1998 to 2011," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 253-263.
    10. Song, Malin & Du, Juntao & Tan, Kim Hua, 2018. "Impact of fiscal decentralization on green total factor productivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 359-367.
    11. Sarah E. Anderson & Mark T. Buntaine & Mengdi Liu & Bing Zhang, 2019. "Non‐Governmental Monitoring of Local Governments Increases Compliance with Central Mandates: A National‐Scale Field Experiment in China," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(3), pages 626-643, July.
    12. Dorothee Feils & Manzur Rahman & Florin Şabac, 2018. "Corporate Governance Systems Diversity: A Coasian Perspective on Stakeholder Rights," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 451-466, June.
    13. Manello, Alessandro, 2017. "Productivity growth, environmental regulation and win–win opportunities: The case of chemical industry in Italy and Germany," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 733-743.
    14. Meng, Jia & Zhang, ZhongXiang, 2022. "Corporate environmental information disclosure and investor response: Evidence from China's capital market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weibing Li & Yongwen Yang, 2024. "The effect of environmental centralisation on productivity: Evidence from an administrative reform in China," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 824-851, March.
    2. Bai, Caiquan & Liu, Hangjuan & Zhang, Rongjie & Feng, Chen, 2023. "Blessing or curse? Market-driven environmental regulation and enterprises' total factor productivity: Evidence from China's carbon market pilots," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Jing Tang & Shilong Li, 2022. "How Do Environmental Regulation and Environmental Decentralization Affect Regional Green Innovation? Empirical Research from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Jian Song & Yijing Wang & Jing Wang, 2022. "The Impact of SO 2 Emissions Trading Scheme on Firm’s Environmental Performance: A Channel from Robot Application," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-31, December.
    5. Sun, Chuanwang & Tie, Ying & Yu, Lili, 2024. "How to achieve both environmental protection and firm performance improvement: Based on China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    6. Zhao, Feifei & Hu, Zheng & Yi, Ping & Zhao, Xu, 2024. "Does environmental decentralization improve industrial ecology? Evidence from China's Yangtze River Economic Belt," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 1250-1270.
    7. Zhuoxi Yu & Yu Wu & Zhichuan Zhu, 2023. "Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation and High-Quality Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Wang, Weilong & Xiao, Deheng & Wang, Jianlong & Wu, Haitao, 2024. "The cost of pollution in the digital era: Impediments of air pollution on enterprise digital transformation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Victoria Bogdan & Claudia Diana Sabău-Popa & Marcel-Ioan Boloș & Dorina-Nicoleta Popa & Mărioara Beleneși, 2022. "Tracking Waste Management Information Disclosure Behavior Connected to Financial Performance through Moderating Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-25, October.
    10. Zhang, Ning & Zhao, Yu & Wang, Na, 2022. "Is China's energy policy effective for power plants? Evidence from the 12th Five-Year Plan energy saving targets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Ren, Shenggang & Wu, Yanping & Zhao, Li & Du, Lei, 2024. "Third-party environmental information disclosure and firms' carbon emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Chongchong, 2024. "Reaping green dividend: The effect of China's urban new energy transition strategy on green economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    13. Aysenur Tarakcioglu Altinay & Mesut Dogan & Bilge Leyli Demirel Ergun & Sevdie Alshiqi, 2023. "The Fama-French Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model: A Research on Borsa Istanbul," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 3-21.
    14. Meng Lingyan & Ze Zhao & Haider Ali Malik & Asif Razzaq & Hui An & Marria Hassan, 2022. "Asymmetric impact of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation on carbon emissions: Evidence from highly decentralized countries," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(4), pages 752-782, June.
    15. Fan Ren, 2024. "Does Government Environmental Concern Affect Enterprise Sustainable Development? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Mingxiong Bi & Chencheng Wang & Dian Fu & Xun Tan & Shurong Yu & Junbai Pan & Kun Lv, 2022. "Chinese-Style Fiscal Decentralization, Ecological Attention of Government, and Regional Energy Intensity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-28, November.
    17. Zhou, Bo & Ding, Hao, 2023. "How public attention drives corporate environmental protection: Effects and channels," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Erli Dan & Jianfei Shen & Yiwei Guo, 2023. "Corporate Sustainable Growth, Carbon Performance, and Voluntary Carbon Information Disclosure: New Panel Data Evidence for Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, March.
    19. Haiqing Hu & Di Chen & Chun‐Ping Chang & Yin Chu, 2021. "The Political Economy Of Environmental Consequences: A Review Of The Empirical Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 250-306, February.
    20. Weizhou Su & Nieping Wei & Zihan Yuan & Sidai Guo, 2023. "The Impact of Environmental Information Disclosure on the Efficiency of Enterprise Capital Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:793-:d:1022415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.