IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14626-d1256076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Sustainable Development: Investigating the Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Green Total Factor Productivity in Coal Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Yang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Energy Economy and Management Research Center, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Jinbo Qiao

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Shaohui Zou

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Energy Economy and Management Research Center, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Delu Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China)

  • Jiayi Hao

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

Understanding the heterogeneity and driving factors of green total factor productivity (GTFP) in coal enterprises can provide guidance for policy design regarding the sustainable development of coal in the future. In contrast to previous research at the macro level, we adopt and extend the data envelopment analysis method to measure and quantitatively decompose the GTFP of coal enterprises, examine inter-enterprise heterogeneity at multiple levels, explain the effects of the key driving factors and moderating factors of GTFP in theory, and subsequently conduct empirical testing using data obtained from 639 coal enterprises in China. The results indicate that there is significant inter-enterprise heterogeneity in GTFP in terms of enterprise scale, enterprise growth stage, government–enterprise collusion (GEC), and regional differences. The enterprise scale and enterprise growth stage have significantly positive effects on GTFP, while GEC has a significantly negative effect on GTFP. Technological progress, scale efficiency, and pure technical efficiency have moderating effects on enterprise scale, enterprise growth stage, and GEC. The results have valuable policy implications; it is necessary for the government to allocate significant resources towards thoroughly examining the potential effects arising from the heterogeneity of GTFP among coal enterprises, to weaken control over the aggregate target, and to strengthen the use of market-oriented policy instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Yang & Jinbo Qiao & Shaohui Zou & Delu Wang & Jiayi Hao, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Development: Investigating the Heterogeneity and Driving Factors of Green Total Factor Productivity in Coal Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14626-:d:1256076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14626/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14626/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuxin Fang & Hongjun Cao, 2022. "Environmental Decentralization, Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation, and Green Total Factor Productivity—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Quanqi Liu & Li Li, 2019. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Government Regulation, Spatial Distance and Enterprise Carbon Information Disclosure: An Analysis Based on the Heavy Pollution Industry in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Cuixia Gao & Ying Zhong & Isaac Adjei Mensah & Simin Tao & Yuyang He, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Impact of Global Migration on Carbon Transfers Based on Complex Network and Stepwise Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Biswaranjita Mahapatra & Chandan Bhar & Sandeep Mondal, 2020. "Performance Assessment Based on the Relative Efficiency of Indian Opencast Coal Mines Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Malmquist Productivity Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Xu, Hangtian & Nakajima, Kentaro, 2016. "Did China's coal mine regulation positively affect economic growth?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 160-168.
    6. Ming Zhang & Wensheng Wang & Xialing Sun, 2023. "Measurement and Multiple Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in China’s Coal Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. Zhu, Xuehong & Chen, Ying & Feng, Chao, 2018. "Green total factor productivity of China's mining and quarrying industry: A global data envelopment analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Pu, Xiaohong & Zeng, Ming & Zhang, Weike, 2023. "Corporate sustainable development driven by high-quality innovation: Does fiscal decentralization really matter?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 273-289.
    9. Yufang Shi & Tianlun Zhang & Yufeng Jiang, 2023. "Digital Economy, Technological Innovation and Urban Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yan He & Yung-ho Chiu & Bin Zhang, 2020. "Prevaluating Technical Efficiency Gains From Potential Mergers and Acquisitions in China’s Coal Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    2. Du, Yimeng & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2019. "Can climate mitigation help the poor? Measuring impacts of the CDM in rural China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 178-197.
    3. Shujun Chao & Shanyong Wang & Haidong Li & Shu Yang, 2023. "The power of culture: Does Confucian culture contribute to corporate environmental information disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2435-2456, September.
    4. Ziyan Zheng & Fangdao Qiu & Xinlin Zhang, 2020. "Heterogeneity of correlation between the locational condition and industrial transformation of regenerative resource‐based cities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(2), pages 771-791, June.
    5. Yaozu Xue, 2022. "Evaluation analysis on industrial green total factor productivity and energy transition policy in resource-based region," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(3), pages 419-434, May.
    6. Yujian Jin & Lihong Yu & Yan Wang, 2022. "Green Total Factor Productivity and Its Saving Effect on the Green Factor in China’s Strategic Minerals Industry from 1998–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Zhang, Yijun & Li, Xiaoping & Song, Yi & Jiang, Feitao, 2021. "Can green industrial policy improve total factor productivity? Firm-level evidence from China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.
    8. Shuying Wang & Yifei Gao & Hongchang Zhou, 2022. "Research on Green Total Factor Productivity Enhancement Path from the Configurational Perspective—Based on the TOE Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Xiangqian Wang & Shudong Wang & Yongqiu Xia, 2022. "Evaluation and Dynamic Evolution of the Total Factor Environmental Efficiency in China’s Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Ji, Qiang & Nie, Song, 2024. "How does local government fiscal pressure affect corporate ESG performance?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    11. Yu, Xiang, 2023. "An assessment of the green development efficiency of industrial parks in China: Based on non-desired output and non-radial DEA model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 81-88.
    12. Meiling Wang & Silu Pang & Ikram Hmani & Ilham Hmani & Cunfang Li & Zhengxia He, 2021. "Towards sustainable development: How does technological innovation drive the increase in green total factor productivity?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 217-227, January.
    13. Zhang, Rui & Qie, Xiaotong & Hu, Yanyong & Chen, Xue, 2022. "Does de-capacity policy promote the efficient and green development of the coal industry? –Based on the evidence of China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Brueckner, Marcus & Hong, Haidi & Vespignani, Joaquin, 2023. "Regulation of petrol and diesel prices and their effects on GDP growth: evidence from China," Working Papers 2023-02, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    15. Chen, Xiang & Chen, Yong & Huang, Wenli & Zhang, Xuping, 2023. "A new Malmquist-type green total factor productivity measure: An application to China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2021. "The win-win ability of environmental protection and economic development during China's transition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Ma, Ding & Fei, Rilong & Yu, Yongsheng, 2019. "How government regulation impacts on energy and CO2 emissions performance in China's mining industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 651-663.
    18. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Xiaowen Zhu & Jinrong He & Jingru Li & Xiang Liu & Yicheng Huang & Qiong Shen, 2022. "What Is the Mechanism of Government Green Development Behavior Considering Multi-Agent Interaction? A Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Liu, Yajie & Cui, Lijuan & Xiong, Yanyan & Yao, Xianguo, 2023. "Does the development of the Internet improve the allocative efficiency of production factors? Evidence from surveys of Chinese manufacturing firms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 161-174.
    20. Qi Song & Xiaohong Chen & Hao Gu, 2023. "How Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Drive Enterprise Digital Innovation: Analysis Based on the Dynamic FsQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14626-:d:1256076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.