IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14527-d1254556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distribution Channel Selection Using FUCOM-ADAM: A Novel Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Andrejić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Vukašin Pajić

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Milorad Kilibarda

    (Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Vojvode Stepe 305, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The selection of the appropriate distribution channel is crucial for the success of any business dealing with physical goods. When dealing with this selection, it is crucial to have an effective decision support system (DSS) that can assist with such decisions. While various DSS approaches exist in the literature, not all are suitable for real-world applications. This research aims to address this gap by developing practical DSS tools that can aid decision-makers in making optimal decisions even in situations of uncertainty. The paper explores six different distribution channels (retailer’s warehouse, wholesaler’s warehouse, manufacturer’s warehouse, cross-dock, 3PL services, and direct delivery) in order to select the optimal one based on nine established criteria (inventory costs, distribution costs, delivery speed, service level, market coverage, product availability, order consolidation capability, reverse logistics, and order tracking) by using the FUCOM (Full Consistency Method) and ADAM (Axial-Distance-Based Aggregated Measurement) methods. After applying the FUCOM method, C1 (inventory costs) had the highest value when observing criteria weights, whereas C9 (order tracking) had the lowest. The results of the ADAM method showed that A5 (3PL services) was the best-ranked alternative, whereas A4 (cross-dock) was ranked as the worst. Based on the results, a model validation, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine whether the final ranking of the alternatives will change. This research provides decision makers with the necessary tools for better decision making, leading to improved distribution operations and increased profitability for the business.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Andrejić & Vukašin Pajić & Milorad Kilibarda, 2023. "Distribution Channel Selection Using FUCOM-ADAM: A Novel Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14527-:d:1254556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bian, Junsong & Guo, Xiaolei & Li, Kevin W., 2018. "Decentralization or integration: Distribution channel selection under environmental taxation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 170-193.
    2. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Snežana Tadić & Milovan Kovač & Pier Paolo Miglietta, 2023. "A Novel Axial-Distance-Based Aggregated Measurement (ADAM) Method for the Evaluation of Agri-Food Circular-Economy-Based Business Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Luo, Huajiang & Zhong, Ling & Nie, Jiajia, 2022. "Quality and distribution channel selection on a hybrid platform," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingya Wang & Jiusi Wen & Vukašin Pajić & Milan Andrejić, 2024. "Optimizing Cross-Dock Terminal Location Selection: A Multi-Step Approach Based on CI-DEA–IDOCRIW–MABAC for Enhanced Supply Chain Efficiency—A Case Study," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Kumar, Patanjal & Baraiya, Rajendra & Das, Debashree & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar & Xu, Lei & Mangla, Sachin Kumar, 2021. "Social responsibility and cost-learning in dyadic supply chain coordination," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Zhou, Yu & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Suyuan & Xiong, Yu & Ye, Niangyue, 2022. "Anti-Counterfeiting in a retail Platform: A Game-Theoretic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Bian, Junsong & Zhang, Guoqing & Zhou, Guanghui, 2023. "The strategic impact of vertical integration on non-deceptive counterfeiting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    6. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Liu, He & Li, Jialu & Zhang, Kai & Lev, Benjamin, 2023. "Channel strategies when digital platforms emerge: A systematic literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Srivastava, Abhishek & Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mateen, Arqum & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan, 2022. "Design and selection of government policies for electric vehicles adoption: A global perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Huang, Shuai & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Wang, Ningning, 2020. "Green subsidy modes and pricing strategy in a capital-constrained supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Xu, Song & Fang, Lei & Govindan, Kannan, 2022. "Energy performance contracting in a supply chain with financially asymmetric manufacturers under carbon tax regulation for climate change mitigation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    10. Liu, Guanmei & Shao, Xiaofeng & Lang, Xiao, 2020. "On the interaction of technology upgrade and buyer entry in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan, 2020. "Competitive environmental sourcing strategies in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    12. Jun Wang & Qian Zhang & Xinman Lu & Rui Ma & Baoqin Yu & Huming Gao, 2022. "Emission reduction and coordination of a dynamic supply chain with green reputation," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 3945-3988, September.
    13. Li, Wei & Zhao, Xuan & Chen, Jing, 2023. "Co-opetition or decentralization? A study of manufacturers’ sourcing and distribution strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 867-886.
    14. Hu, Shu & Yu, Dennis Z. & Fu, Ke, 2023. "Online platforms’ warehouse capacity allocation strategies for multiple products," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    15. Zhuo, Wenyan & Peng, Jiawu & Wang, Jingru, 2024. "Game theoretical analysis of incumbent platform investment and the supplier entry strategies in an e-supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    16. Miloš Veljović & Snežana Tadić & Mladen Krstić, 2024. "Last Word in Last-Mile Logistics: A Novel Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Ranking Industry 4.0 Technologies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, June.
    17. Wu, Qianni & Chiu, Chun-Hung, 2023. "The impacts of carbon insurance on supply chain and environment considering technology risk under cap-and-trade mechanism," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    18. De, Arijit & Ray, Ankita & Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2023. "Is it wise to compete or to collaborate? Remanufacturing business models under collective extended producer responsibility legislation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    19. Wang, Kai & Lin, Jun & Liu, Guoquan & Liu, Qi, 2022. "Strategic introduction of logistics retail and finance under competition and channel spillover," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    20. Buccella, Domenico & Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2022. "‘Green’ managerial delegation theory," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 223-249, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14527-:d:1254556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.