IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14509-d1254129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of and Resistance to Nudge Decision-Making in Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Balconi

    (International research center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Carlotta Acconito

    (International research center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Katia Rovelli

    (International research center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy)

  • Laura Angioletti

    (International research center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

This study investigated how professionals’ decision-making is influenced by nudging and their resistance to such a form of conditioning. A total of 61 professionals performed a nudge task in which three different scenarios related to wellbeing and sustainable behaviours were presented to the participants under boosted and soft nudge conditions. After the presentation of each scenario, participants were required to decide between two options of choice: one choice was more nudge-induced, the other was not. Electrophysiological (EEG), autonomic, behavioural, and self-report data were collected to determine the correlates of resistance with nudge conditions. The findings showed that professionals’ resistance to nudging is high and not influenced by boosted or soft nudges. Also, while the generalized increase in EEG delta, theta, and beta power localized and lateralized in the right temporoparietal regions can lay the foundation of “the neural architecture” of resistance to nudging, the significant increase in SCR for the boosted compared to soft condition highlighted the pivotal role of this marker as the only indicator that differentiates the two nudge conditions. Overall, evaluating the correlates of the resistance to nudge can be useful to render professionals aware of the explicit and implicit factors to be strengthened to resist to such form of conditioning.

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Balconi & Carlotta Acconito & Katia Rovelli & Laura Angioletti, 2023. "Influence of and Resistance to Nudge Decision-Making in Professionals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14509-:d:1254129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hannah Barker & Peter J. Shaw & Beth Richards & Zoe Clegg & Dianna Smith, 2021. "What Nudge Techniques Work for Food Waste Behaviour Change at the Consumer Level? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Carolin V. Zorell, 2020. "Nudges, Norms, or Just Contagion? A Theory on Influences on the Practice of (Non-)Sustainable Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Alexander Soutschek & Marius Moisa & Christian C Ruff & Philippe N Tobler, 2020. "The right temporoparietal junction enables delay of gratification by allowing decision makers to focus on future events," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Cristiana Cerqueira Leal & Ines Branco-Illodo & Benilde Maria do Nascimento Oliveira & Luisa Esteban-Salvador, 2022. "Nudging and Choice Architecture: Perspectives and Challenges," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(5), pages 220098-2200.
    5. Irene Roozen & Mariet Raedts & Laura Meijburg, 2021. "Do verbal and visual nudges influence consumers’ choice for sustainable fashion?," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 327-342, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danuta Miłaszewicz, 2022. "Survey Results on Using Nudges for Choice of Green-Energy Supplier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Hannah Barker & Peter J. Shaw & Beth Richards & Zoe Clegg & Dianna M. Smith, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Food Systems: Exploring Household Food Waste by Photographic Diary in Relation to Unprocessed, Processed and Ultra-Processed Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Marco Bardus & May A. Massoud, 2022. "Predicting the Intention to Sort Waste at Home in Rural Communities in Lebanon: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Jain, Monika & Singh, Archana, 2024. "An empirical study on electric vehicle adoption in India: A step towards a greener environment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 112-125.
    5. Mehdi Mahmoudi & Hosein Mohammadi & Sayed Saghaian & Alireza Karbasi, 2024. "Factors Affecting the Waste of Selected Agricultural Products with an Emphasis on the Marketing Mix," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Meital Peleg Mizrachi & Alon Tal, 2024. "Fast Fashion, Sustainability, and Nudge Theory: Examining the Effects of Choice Architecture on Consumption of Sustainable Fashion over Fast Fashion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-32, October.
    7. Christine Kawa & Wim H. Gijselaers & Jan F. H. Nijhuis & Patrizia M. Ianiro-Dahm, 2022. "Are You “Nudgeable”? Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Healthy Eating Nudges in a Cafeteria Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Birgit Teufer & Sonja Grabner‐Kräuter, 2023. "How consumer networks contribute to sustainable mindful consumption and well‐being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 757-784, April.
    9. Tafur Gómez, Jorge Andrés & Martínez Giraldo, Jhully Paulin, 2024. "Students' perception of the application of nudges," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 25(2), pages 190-218, July.
    10. Li Jia & Guanghua Qiao, 2022. "Quantification, Environmental Impact, and Behavior Management: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Global Food Waste Research Based on CiteSpace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Janelle D. Healy & Satvinder S. Dhaliwal & Christina M. Pollard & Piyush Sharma & Clare Whitton & Lauren C. Blekkenhorst & Carol J. Boushey & Jane A. Scott & Deborah A. Kerr, 2023. "Australian Consumers’ Attitudes towards Sustainable Diet Practices Regarding Food Waste, Food Processing, and the Health Aspects of Diet: A Cross Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Sehrash Gul & Waseem Ahmed, 2024. "Enhancing the Theory of Planned Behavior with Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Environmental Concern towards Pro-Environmental Purchase Intentions for Eco-Friendly Apparel: A Review Article," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(1), pages 784-791.
    13. Danica Jobson & Gamithri Gayana Karunasena & Nazia Nabi & David Pearson & Emily Dunstan, 2024. "A Systematic Review of Pre-Post Studies Testing Behaviour Change Interventions to Reduce Consumer Food Waste in the Household," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-32, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14509-:d:1254129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.