IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14493-d1253832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Energy Efficiency Evaluation Model of Substation Building Based on AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Binglei Xue

    (State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Economic and Technical Research Institute, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Fumu Lu

    (State Grid Shandong Electric Power Company Economic and Technical Research Institute, Jinan 250021, China)

  • Juanli Guo

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Zhoupeng Wang

    (Future Technology Institute, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Zhongrui Zhang

    (Future Technology Institute, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Yi Lu

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

The traditional energy-saving evaluation method for industrial buildings is intended for all industrial buildings; however, substation buildings belong to a special category of industrial buildings, and their energy consumption characteristics are different from those of general industrial buildings. Consequently, it is necessary to establish an energy-saving evaluation system for substation buildings according to the characteristics of their energy consumption. In view of the issue that the energy consumption characteristics of substation buildings are different from those of other industrial buildings, an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) are used to establish a more comprehensive energy saving evaluation model that is more applicable to substation buildings. This paper determines 19 quantitative indicators and 13 qualitative indicators through the screening of relevant standards and norms, as well as the literature, and then determines the weight of each indicator by using AHP before finally establishing a secondary evaluation model based on FCE. In this paper, a substation in Shandong, China was selected as a case study to verify the proposed evaluation model, scoring 80.4 points, which falls within the “Good” grade. This method is of great significance for the future establishment of energy-saving evaluation system for substation buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Binglei Xue & Fumu Lu & Juanli Guo & Zhoupeng Wang & Zhongrui Zhang & Yi Lu, 2023. "Research on Energy Efficiency Evaluation Model of Substation Building Based on AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14493-:d:1253832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14493/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14493/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Xinghui & Yang, Jiaojiao & Zhao, Xudong, 2018. "Optimal study of the rural house space heating systems employing the AHP and FCE methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 631-641.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Guozhong & Wang, Xiao, 2020. "The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Yong Zhu & Shihu Zhong & Ying Wang & Muhua Liu, 2021. "Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Congguang Zhang & Jiaming Sun & Jieying Ma & Fuqing Xu & Ling Qiu, 2019. "Environmental Assessment of a Hybrid Solar-Biomass Energy Supplying System: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Liu, Jicheng & Lu, Yunyuan, 2023. "A task matching model of photovoltaic storage system under the energy blockchain environment - based on GA-CLOUD-GS algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Yaqin Liao & Guanghui Yu & Yan Liao & Lei Jiang & Xianzhao Liu, 2018. "Environmental Conflict Risk Assessment Based on AHP-FCE: A Case of Jiuhua Waste Incineration Power Plant Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Dongmei Huang & Weijun Li & Xikun Chang & Yunliang Tan, 2019. "Key Factors Identification and Risk Assessment for the Stability of Deep Surrounding Rock in Coal Roadway," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Ahadi, Pedram & Fakhrabadi, Farbod & Pourshaghaghy, Alireza & Kowsary, Farshad, 2023. "Optimal site selection for a solar power plant in Iran via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Raghu KC & Jarno Föhr & Tapio Ranta, 2023. "Public Perception on the Sustainable Energy Transition in Rural Finland: A Multi-criteria Approach," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 735-755, June.
    9. Anqiang Jia & Xin Yun & Xiaowen Zheng & Xuan Wen & Xiaoxu Liang & Yingxia Yun, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Rural Revitalization: A Multidimensional Evaluation of Rural Vitality in China’s Traditional Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-26, June.
    10. Wang, Dongji & Liu, Liansheng & Liu, Chunyu & Xie, Jun & Yuan, Ye & Yang, Hua & Duan, Runze, 2021. "A novel supply chain of straw briquette fuel and the optimal way to acquire fixed assets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Zhang, Xinghui & Yang, Jiaojiao & Fan, Yi & Zhao, Xudong & Yan, Ruimiao & Zhao, Juan & Myers, Steve, 2020. "Experimental and analytic study of a hybrid solar/biomass rural heating system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    12. Tongze Han & Ping Liu & Changlin Niu & Qiangnian Li, 2023. "Evaluation of energy-saving retrofit projects of existing rural residential envelope structures from the perspective of rural residents: the Chinese case," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 8419-8446, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14493-:d:1253832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.