IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13919-d1243322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Media Attention on the Quality of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information Disclosure in Enterprises: An Adjustment Effect Based on the Shareholder Relationship Network

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Cui

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Xiaofang Chen

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Wenlei Xia

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Yu Hu

    (School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)

Abstract

As an intermediary in information dissemination and a guide of public opinion, the media represent an important external supervision force in corporate governance. It is very important to fully understand the supporting role of public media in the modernization of environmental governance in China to improve the quality of ESG information disclosure. Based on the data of companies listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 Index from 2015 to 2020, this paper finds that media attention has a significant positive impact on ESG information disclosure, that is, high-frequency media attention can promote the quality of ESG information disclosure, while different types of media reports can promote the quality of ESG information disclosure. Considering the characteristics of media emotions, it is found that negative media reports can promote the quality of ESG information disclosure. The shareholder relationship network strengthens the positive influence of media attention on the ESG information disclosure of enterprises through the information advantage of a “weak relationship”. These research conclusions reveal the internal influence of media attention on the quality of the ESG information disclosure of enterprises and the regulatory role of the shareholder relationship network to some extent, which provides the governance perspective on and empirical basis for ESG information disclosure research, and it also provides a decision-making reference for promoting the quality of the ESG information disclosure of listed enterprises in China, enriching the theoretical research and practical exploration of ESG information disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Cui & Xiaofang Chen & Wenlei Xia & Yu Hu, 2023. "Influence of Media Attention on the Quality of Environmental, Social, and Governance Information Disclosure in Enterprises: An Adjustment Effect Based on the Shareholder Relationship Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13919-:d:1243322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13919/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13919/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory S. Miller, 2006. "The Press as a Watchdog for Accounting Fraud," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1001-1033, December.
    2. Philipp Krueger & Zacharias Sautner & Dragon Yongjun Tang & Rui Zhong, 2021. "The Effects of Mandatory ESG Disclosure Around the World," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 21-44, Swiss Finance Institute.
    3. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    4. Baloria, Vishal P. & Heese, Jonas, 2018. "The effects of media slant on firm behavior," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 184-202.
    5. Pedersen, Lasse Heje & Fitzgibbons, Shaun & Pomorski, Lukasz, 2021. "Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 572-597.
    6. He, Feng & Qin, Shuqi & Liu, Yuanyuan & Wu, Ji (George), 2022. "CSR and idiosyncratic risk: Evidence from ESG information disclosure," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    7. Fen Zhang & Xiaonan Qin & Lina Liu, 2020. "The Interaction Effect between ESG and Green Innovation and Its Impact on Firm Value from the Perspective of Information Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Yongjun Tang & Mingjia Sun & Wenchao Ma & Shixiu Bai, 2020. "The External Pressure, Internal Drive and Voluntary Carbon Disclosure in China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(14), pages 3367-3382, November.
    9. Brian J. Bushee & John E. Core & Wayne Guay & Sophia J.W. Hamm, 2010. "The Role of the Business Press as an Information Intermediary," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Ge Ge & Xiang Xiao & Zhenzhu Li & Qinghui Dai, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Promote High-Quality Development of Enterprises in China? The Mediating Role of Innovation Input," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peng, Changhong & Zhang, Shuqin & Rong, Xueyun & Chen, Dongjing, 2024. "Is China's green credit policy effective? -Based on the perspective of enterprise environmental performance and economic performance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Haixu & Liang, Chuanyu & Liu, Zhaohua & Wang, He, 2023. "News-based ESG sentiment and stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    2. An, Zhe & Chen, Chen & Naiker, Vic & Wang, Jun, 2020. "Does media coverage deter firms from withholding bad news? Evidence from stock price crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Mansouri, Sasan, 2021. "Does firm's silence drive media's attention away?," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242433, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Call, Andrew C. & Emett, Scott A. & Maksymov, Eldar & Sharp, Nathan Y., 2022. "Meet the press: Survey evidence on financial journalists as information intermediaries," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    5. Caixiaoyang Ge, 2024. "Negative Media Coverage and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Wen, Hui & Ho, Ken C. & Gao, Jijun & Yu, Li, 2022. "The fundamental effects of ESG disclosure quality in boosting the growth of ESG investing," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Tristan Jourde & Arthur Stalla-Bourdillon, 2024. "PEnvironmental Preferences and Sector Valuations," Working papers 964, Banque de France.
    8. Zhou, Jingting & Li, Wanli & Yan, Ziqiao & Lyu, Huaili, 2021. "Controlling shareholder share pledging and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Spira, Robin, 2024. "How does ESG rating disagreement influence analyst forecast dispersion?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(3), pages 1769-1804.
    10. Lixiang Wang & Wendi Hou & Yupei Liu, 2023. "How do co‐shareholding networks affect negative media coverage? Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(4), pages 4221-4249, December.
    11. Sebastian Kaumanns, 2019. "“Some fuzzy math”: relational information on debt value adjustments by managers and the financial press," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 755-794, December.
    12. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    13. Torsten Ehlers & Ulrike Elsenhuber & Kumar Jegarasasingam & Eric Jondeau, 2022. "Deconstructing ESG Scores: How to Invest with Your own Criteria," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 22-23, Swiss Finance Institute.
    14. Tan, Yafei & Zhu, Zhaohui, 2022. "The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers' environmental awareness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Jeffrey Cohen & Yuan Ding & Cédric Lesage & Hervé Stolowy, 2017. "Media Bias and the Persistence of the Expectation Gap: An Analysis of Press Articles on Corporate Fraud," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 637-659, September.
    16. Ren, Xiaohang & Zeng, Gudian & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Digital finance and corporate ESG performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Wu, Chunying & Xiong, Xiong & Gao, Ya, 2022. "The role of different information sources in information spread: Evidence from three media channels in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 327-341.
    18. Robert M. Bushman & Christopher D. Williams & Regina Wittenberg‐Moerman, 2017. "The Informational Role of the Media in Private Lending," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 115-152, March.
    19. Zou, Jin & Yan, Jingzhou & Deng, Guoying, 2023. "ESG rating confusion and bond spreads," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. He, Feng & Yan, Yulin & Hao, Jing & Wu, Ji (George), 2022. "Retail investor attention and corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13919-:d:1243322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.