IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i18p13445-d1235352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Strategic Interpretation of Landscape through Interaction between Natural, Built and Virtual Environments: The Case Study of Piazzola sul Brenta

Author

Listed:
  • Greta Montanari

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Andrea Giordano

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Gianmario Guidarelli

    (Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy)

  • Federica Maietti

    (Department of Architecture, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)

  • Elena Svalduz

    (Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

The need to digitize data as an analysis tool is increasingly a topical issue, also because it is a tool of common interest for several disciplines. This new research merges with the iNEST project (Interconnected Nord-Est Innovation Ecosystem), referring in particular to Spoke 4: city, architecture and sustainable design, which aims at extending the beneficial effects of digitalization to the areas of “Nord-Est” Italy. The project started in August 2022 and will end in August 2025. Knowing that the trend of urbanization, metropolis living, and climate change is related to psychologically stressful situations as a result of environmental stressors, this research aims to analyze if living in a place surrounded by natural and valuable artificial elements (i.e., historical architecture, art) is crucial in generating health and psychophysical well-being. This paper presents the case study of Piazzola sul Brenta, a small town in the Veneto region on which a territorial analysis was carried out to understand the existing dynamics between the natural and artificial environment, using the literature and historical maps. Since this research began recently, with only preliminary and partial results so far, this paper focuses on the interdisciplinary discussion developed around this topic, showing the first part of a research that aims to create models of urban and landscape contexts that enable in-depth analysis and the prefiguration of strategies for regeneration.

Suggested Citation

  • Greta Montanari & Andrea Giordano & Gianmario Guidarelli & Federica Maietti & Elena Svalduz, 2023. "A Strategic Interpretation of Landscape through Interaction between Natural, Built and Virtual Environments: The Case Study of Piazzola sul Brenta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13445-:d:1235352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13445/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/18/13445/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Dobrzańska & Adam Nadolny & Robert Kalbarczyk & Monika Ziemiańska, 2022. "Urban Resilience and Residential Greenery—The Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justyna Rubaszek & Janusz Gubański & Anna Podolska, 2023. "Do We Need Public Green Spaces Accessibility Standards for the Sustainable Development of Urban Settlements? The Evidence from Wrocław, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Magdalena Szczepańska & Anna Gałecka-Drozda & Agnieszka Wilkaniec, 2023. "Green Space at New Housing Estates: Flat Price Versus Accessibility to Good Quality Greenery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:18:p:13445-:d:1235352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.