IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i2p358-d1587163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Possibilities of Implementing the ALS-Based 3-30-300 Concept for Urban Green Space Management in Small Municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Mitelsztedt

    (Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Mariusz Ciesielski

    (Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Tomasz Hycza

    (Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Marek Lisańczuk

    (Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Kacper Guderski

    (Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Sylwia Kurpiewska

    (Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Korzeniewski

    (Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute, Sękocin Stary, Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

Abstract

This study examines the applicability of the 3-30-300 rule in five medium-sized Polish municipalities. The rule states that residents should be able to see at least three trees from their homes, neighborhoods should have at least 30% tree canopy coverage, and public green spaces should be within 300 m. The method proposed in this study shows that the tree visibility component of the 3-30-300 concept is the most fluctuating index, and it strongly depends on the settings of the algorithm parameter, as well as on the placement of artificially generated observers. This demonstrates the complexity of the issue and the need to further specify the nuances of the 3-30-300 rule. The work shows that all variables of the 3-30-300 rule can be calculated based on publicly available data, such as point clouds, which are increasingly being made available for free for research and implementation purposes. The study concludes that the proposed solution is effective in assessing the availability of green spaces and emphasizes the need for qualitative improvements in the management of urban green spaces. While the 3-30-300 rule can serve as the foundation for future urban planning, complementary strategies are needed to ensure long-term sustainability and better access to green spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Mitelsztedt & Mariusz Ciesielski & Tomasz Hycza & Marek Lisańczuk & Kacper Guderski & Sylwia Kurpiewska & Krzysztof Korzeniewski, 2025. "Exploring the Possibilities of Implementing the ALS-Based 3-30-300 Concept for Urban Green Space Management in Small Municipalities," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:358-:d:1587163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/358/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/2/358/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciesielski, Mariusz & Stereńczak, Krzysztof, 2021. "Using Flickr data and selected environmental characteristics to analyse the temporal and spatial distribution of activities in forest areas," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Evans, D.L. & Falagán, N. & Hardman, C.A. & Kourmpetli, S. & Liu, L. & Mead, B.R. & Davies, J.A.C., 2022. "Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure – a systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Mojca Nastran & Marina Pintar & Špela Železnikar & Rozalija Cvejić, 2022. "Stakeholders’ Perceptions on the Role of Urban Green Infrastructure in Providing Ecosystem Services for Human Well-Being," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Dou, Yuehan & Zhen, Lin & De Groot, Rudolf & Du, Bingzhen & Yu, Xiubo, 2017. "Assessing the importance of cultural ecosystem services in urban areas of Beijing municipality," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 79-90.
    5. Joanna Dobrzańska & Adam Nadolny & Robert Kalbarczyk & Monika Ziemiańska, 2022. "Urban Resilience and Residential Greenery—The Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Luca Battisti & Fabrizio Aimar & Giovanni Giacco & Marco Devecchi, 2023. "Urban Green Development and Resilient Cities: A First Insight into Urban Forest Planning in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    7. Jessica Verheij & Deniz Ay & Jean-David Gerber & Stéphane Nahrath, 2023. "Ensuring Public Access to Green Spaces in Urban Densification: The Role of Planning and Property Rights," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 342-365, May.
    8. Danchen Liang & Ganlin Huang, 2023. "Influence of Urban Tree Traits on Their Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariana Oliveira & Remo Santagata & Serena Kaiser & Yanxin Liu & Chiara Vassillo & Patrizia Ghisellini & Gengyuan Liu & Sergio Ulgiati, 2022. "Socioeconomic and Environmental Benefits of Expanding Urban Green Areas: A Joint Application of i-Tree and LCA Approaches," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Tingting Zhang & Dan He & Tian Kuang & Ke Chen, 2022. "Effect of Rural Human Settlement Environment around Nature Reserves on Farmers’ Well-Being: A Field Survey Based on 1002 Farmer Households around Six Nature Reserves in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Beatrice Maria Bellè & Alessandro Deserti, 2024. "Urban Greening Plans: A Potential Device towards a Sustainable and Co-Produced Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Berglihn, Elisabeth Cornelia & Gómez-Baggethun, Erik, 2021. "Ecosystem services from urban forests: The case of Oslomarka, Norway," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Jericó-Daminello, C. & Schröter, B. & Mancilla Garcia, M. & Albert, C., 2021. "Exploring perceptions of stakeholder roles in ecosystem services coproduction," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    6. Wang, Ruoyu & Cao, Mengqiu & Yao, Yao & Wu, Wenjie, 2022. "The inequalities of different dimensions of visible street urban green space provision: A machine learning approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Mara Ottoboni & Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo & Massimo De Marchi & Fabrizio Ungaro, 2023. "Characterization and Mapping of Public and Private Green Areas in the Municipality of Forlì (NE Italy) Using High-Resolution Images," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Daymond, Tahlia & Andrew, Margaret E. & Kobryn, Halina T., 2023. "Crowdsourcing social values data: Flickr and public participation GIS provide different perspectives of ecosystem services in a remote coastal region," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Khosravi, Faramarz & Izbirak, Gokhan, 2024. "A framework of index system for gauging the sustainability of iranian provinces by fusing analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and rough set theory (RST)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. Lee, Heera & Seo, Bumsuk & Cord, Anna F. & Volk, Martin & Lautenbach, Sven, 2022. "Using crowdsourced images to study selected cultural ecosystem services and their relationships with species richness and carbon sequestration," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    11. Tiancheng Xie & Xinyan Liu & Pingjun Nie, 2022. "Study on Spatial–Temporal Patterns and Factors Influencing Human Settlement Quality in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Haixia Zhao & Binjie Gu & Jinding Fan & Junqi Wang & Liancong Luo, 2023. "Socioeconomic Factors Influence the Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Blue–Green Infrastructure Demand: A Case of Nanjing City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Dickinson, Dawn C. & Hobbs, Richard J., 2017. "Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 179-194.
    14. Manley, Kyle & Nyelele, Charity & Egoh, Benis N., 2022. "A review of machine learning and big data applications in addressing ecosystem service research gaps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    15. Zapata-Caldas, Emmanuel & Calcagni, Fulvia & Baró, Francesc & Langemeyer, Johannes, 2022. "Using crowdsourced imagery to assess cultural ecosystem services in data-scarce urban contexts: The case of the metropolitan area of Cali, Colombia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    16. Adéla Brázdová & Jiří Kupka, 2023. "The Objectivization of the Living Green Walls Concept as a Tool for Urban Greening (Case Study: LIKO-S a.s., Slavkov u Brna, Czech Republic)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Maria Ignatieva & Duy Khiem Tran & Rosangela Tenorio, 2023. "Challenges and Stakeholder Perspectives on Implementing Ecological Designs in Green Public Spaces: A Case Study of Hue City, Vietnam," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Bouwmeester, Josje & Hartmann, Thomas & Ay, Deniz & Gerber, Jean-David, 2024. "Making room for affordable housing: Project-based negotiations between planning authorities and landowners in Dutch and Swiss densification," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Li-Chun Peng & Wan-Yu Lien & Yu-Pin Lin, 2020. "How Experts’ Opinions and Knowledge Affect Their Willingness to Pay for and Ranking of Hydrological Ecosystem Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Justyna Rubaszek & Janusz Gubański & Anna Podolska, 2023. "Do We Need Public Green Spaces Accessibility Standards for the Sustainable Development of Urban Settlements? The Evidence from Wrocław, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:2:p:358-:d:1587163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.