IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13166-d1231054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Conflict-Based Safety Diagnosis of SCI Roundabouts Using a Surrogate Safety Measure Model

Author

Listed:
  • Mehrzad Hasanvand

    (Department of Road Safety and Transportation Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran 14115-335, Iran)

  • Amir Saman Abdollahzadeh Nasiri

    (Department of Civil Engineering, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 15847-43311, Iran)

  • Omid Rahmani

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood 36199-95161, Iran
    Civil Engineering Department, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 14619-88631, Iran)

  • Khaled Shaaban

    (Department of Engineering, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT 84058, USA)

  • Hossein Samadi

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood 36199-95161, Iran)

Abstract

Recently, the surrogate safety assessment model has been considered for the safety performance analysis of roundabouts. This model can perform a detailed analysis of conflicts based on the trajectory data of vehicles inside the roundabout. The Separated Central Island (SCI) roundabout, as one of the roundabouts with distinct geometrical characteristics, holds the potential for safety evaluation using the conflict-based method. Therefore, in this study, a safety diagnosis of an SCI roundabout was conducted for the first time. In this study, a safety diagnosis procedure for SCI roundabout was first defined; for this purpose, vehicle trajectory data were obtained using an Unnamed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and then entered into Surrogate Safety Measure Model software (SSAM 3.0). A case study was conducted on the only SCI roundabout in Iran, located in Mashhad. The parameters of Time-to-Collision (TTC), maximum speed difference of two vehicles involved in a collision (MaxΔV), and maximum speed of vehicles in collision (MaxS) were utilized to determine the type and severity of conflicts and risk analysis. The results of roundabout risk analysis showed that the severity level of conflicts is mainly of the injury type and that the lowest severity of conflicts is related to fatality. In addition, the highest frequency of injury conflicts is associated with lane-change conflict and the lowest frequency is linked to rear-end conflict. The highest and lowest frequency of damage conflicts are related to crossing and lane-change conflicts, respectively. After overall risk scoring, the severity level of conflicts is mainly related to injury type and the lowest severity of conflicts is associated with fatality; 31% of the total conflicts obtained are of the damaging type, and 69% are of the injury type. Finally, comparing the results of the conflict data with the 8-year crash data in such roundabouts confirms that in the absence of crash data in such roundabouts traffic engineers can use the roundabout analysis based on this study to predict the safety situation of such roundabouts before implementing engineering processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehrzad Hasanvand & Amir Saman Abdollahzadeh Nasiri & Omid Rahmani & Khaled Shaaban & Hossein Samadi, 2023. "A Conflict-Based Safety Diagnosis of SCI Roundabouts Using a Surrogate Safety Measure Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13166-:d:1231054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qiujia Liu & Jiali Deng & Yifan Shen & Wenxin Wang & Zhan Zhang & Linjun Lu, 2020. "Safety and Efficiency Analysis of Turbo Roundabout with Simulations Based on the Lujiazui Roundabout in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Zamir Karwand & Safizahanin Mokhtar & Koji Suzuki & Olakunle Oloruntobi & Muhammad Zaly Shah & Siti Hajar Misnan, 2023. "Impact of Splitter-Island on Pedestrian Safety at Roundabout Using Surrogate Safety Measures: A Comparative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Salvatore Leonardi & Natalia Distefano, 2023. "Turbo-Roundabouts as an Instrument for Improving the Efficiency and Safety in Urban Area: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Tullio Giuffrè & Salvatore Trubia & Antonino Canale & Bhagwant Persaud, 2017. "Using Microsimulation to Evaluate Safety and Operational Implications of Newer Roundabout Layouts for European Road Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tullio Giuffrè & Anna Granà & Salvatore Trubia, 2021. "Safety Evaluation of Turbo-Roundabouts with and without Internal Traffic Separations Considering Autonomous Vehicles Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Bawan Mahmood & Jalil Kianfar, 2019. "Driver Behavior Models for Heavy Vehicles and Passenger Cars at a Work Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Elżbieta Macioszek, 2020. "Roundabout Entry Capacity Calculation—A Case Study Based on Roundabouts in Tokyo, Japan, and Tokyo Surroundings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Irena Ištoka Otković & Barbara Karleuša & Aleksandra Deluka-Tibljaš & Sanja Šurdonja & Mario Marušić, 2021. "Combining Traffic Microsimulation Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Sustainable Spatial-Traffic Planning," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi & Arshad Jamal & Imran Reza & Khaled J. Assi & Syed Anees Ahmed, 2019. "Using Microscopic Simulation-Based Analysis to Model Driving Behavior: A Case Study of Khobar-Dammam in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Ammar Šarić & Suada Sulejmanović & Sanjin Albinović & Mirza Pozder & Žanesa Ljevo, 2023. "The Role of Intersection Geometry in Urban Air Pollution Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Aleksandra Deluka Tibljaš & Tullio Giuffrè & Sanja Surdonja & Salvatore Trubia, 2018. "Introduction of Autonomous Vehicles: Roundabouts Design and Safety Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    8. Vincenzo Gallelli & Rosolino Vaiana, 2019. "Safety Improvements by Converting a Standard Roundabout with Unbalanced Flow Distribution into an Egg Turbo Roundabout: Simulation Approach to a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    9. Alicja Sołowczuk & Stanisław Majer, 2023. "Design Study for the Construction of Turbo Roundabouts under Constrained Site Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, September.
    10. Maria Luisa Tumminello & Elżbieta Macioszek & Anna Granà & Tullio Giuffrè, 2023. "A Methodological Framework to Assess Road Infrastructure Safety and Performance Efficiency in the Transition toward Cooperative Driving," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Alessandro Severino & Giuseppina Pappalardo & Salvatore Curto & Salvatore Trubia & Isaac Oyeyemi Olayode, 2021. "Safety Evaluation of Flower Roundabout Considering Autonomous Vehicles Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Othmane Boualam & Attila Borsos & Csaba Koren & Viktor Nagy, 2022. "Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Roundabout Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13166-:d:1231054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.