IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p13076-d1228959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Sustainable Supply Capability of Chinese Tin Resources Based on the Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Model

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolei Fan

    (Faculty of Earth Resource, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Hao Li

    (Faculty of Earth Resource, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Qinfei Yu

    (Chinese Academy of Natural Resources Economics, Beijing 101149, China)

  • Jianming Xu

    (School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Meng Li

    (China Association for Geological Disaster Prevention and Ecological Restoration, Beijing 100043, China)

Abstract

This study focuses on the issue of supply security in Chinese tin resources, conducting a comprehensive analysis encompassing supply security, demand conditions, market risk, and geopolitical stability. The study employs the AHP-Entropy Weight method to calculate the comprehensive weights of various indicators, revealing the sustainable supply capability of the resources and the challenges they confront. The research unveils that the domestic supply potential and the international commercial extraction environment are pivotal influences on the sustainable supply capability of tin resources. Firstly, since 2010, China has started to import net tin ores and concentrates, leading to a substantial increase in external dependency. However, China’s tin resource reserves have gradually decreased, posing challenges to the stability of the tin resource supply. Secondly, the stability of supply countries and the security of import channels critically affect the stability of the tin resource supply chain. A comprehensive analysis of the outcomes indicates a consistent decline in China’s sustainable tin resource supply capability since 2010, primarily due to the deterioration of resource supply conditions, growth in demand, and the escalation of geopolitical risks. Thus, the evolving foreign extraction environment, domestic resource supply potential, and the alteration in the global tin resource extraction landscape require significant attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolei Fan & Hao Li & Qinfei Yu & Jianming Xu & Meng Li, 2023. "Assessment of Sustainable Supply Capability of Chinese Tin Resources Based on the Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13076-:d:1228959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/13076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gardiner, Nicholas J. & Sykes, John P. & Trench, Allan & Robb, Laurence J., 2015. "Tin mining in Myanmar: Production and potential," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 219-233.
    2. Ivan Potravny & Andrey Novoselov & Irina Novoselova & Katherine Yeshia Chávez Ferreyra & Violetta Gassiy, 2022. "Route Selection for Minerals’ Transportation to Ensure Sustainability of the Arctic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Wang, Keying & Wu, Meng & Sun, Yongping & Shi, Xunpeng & Sun, Ao & Zhang, Ping, 2019. "Resource abundance, industrial structure, and regional carbon emissions efficiency in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 203-214.
    4. Nina Indriati Lestari, 2013. "Mineral Governance, Conflicts and Rights: Case Studies on the Informal Mining of Gold, Tin and Coal in Indonesia," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(2), pages 239-240, August.
    5. Anna Galik & Monika Bąk & Katarzyna Bałandynowicz-Panfil & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2022. "Evaluating Labour Market Flexibility Using the TOPSIS Method: Sustainable Industrial Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Jean-Francois Hennart, 1986. "Internalization in Practice: Early Foreign Direct Investments in Malaysian Tin Mining," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 17(2), pages 131-143, June.
    7. Stavros Tomazinakis & George Valakas & Anna Gaki & Dimitrios Damigos & Katerina Adam, 2022. "The Importance and Challenges of Sustainable Development for the Raw Materials Sector: The Views of Key Stakeholders in Three ESEE Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    8. Zhimin Zhang & Guoli Ou & Ayman Elshkaki & Ruilin Liu, 2022. "Evaluation of Regional Carrying Capacity under Economic-Social-Resource-Environment Complex System: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    9. Alexey Bilgaev & Suocheng Dong & Erzhena Sadykova & Fujia Li & Arnold Tulokhonov & Anna Mikheeva & Valentin Batomunkuev, 2023. "Sustainability Assessment of Mineral Resource Sector Companies in Northern Asia (Russia): An Environmental and Socio-Economic Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruijing Zheng & Yu Cheng & Haimeng Liu & Wei Chen & Xiaodong Chen & Yaping Wang, 2022. "The Spatiotemporal Distribution and Drivers of Urban Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Technological Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Olimpia Neagu, 2019. "The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-27, August.
    3. Zhipeng Yu & Yi Liu & Taihua Yan & Ming Zhang, 2024. "Carbon emission efficiency in the age of digital economy: New insights on green technology progress and industrial structure distortion," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4039-4057, July.
    4. Li, Mengxu & Liu, Jianghua & Chen, Yang & Yang, Zhijiu, 2023. "Can sustainable development strategy reduce income inequality in resource-based regions? A natural resource dependence perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    5. Beata Bieszk-Stolorz & Krzysztof Dmytrów, 2022. "Assessment of the Similarity of the Situation in the EU Labour Markets and Their Changes in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Zhao, Xing & Guo, Yifan & Feng, Tianchu, 2023. "Towards green recovery: Natural resources utilization efficiency under the impact of environmental information disclosure," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Yuhanis Ladewi & Meiryani Meiryani & Ahmad Syamil & Agustini Agustini & Agustinus Winoto, 2024. "The Relation between Climate Change and Carbon Emission Trading: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 686-697, January.
    8. Yun, Na, 2024. "Resources curse via natural resources utilization: Linking digitalization and resources markets for economy perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Guo, Yongqin & Deng, Jianghua & Liu, Xinyu, 2023. "None-linear nexus between natural resources dependency, foreign direct investment, and environmental sustainability in newly industrialized countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Wang, Na & Fu, Xiaodong & Wang, Shaobin & Yang, Hao & Li, Zhen, 2022. "Convergence characteristics and distribution patterns of residential electricity consumption in China: An urban-rural gap perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    11. Liu, Yang & Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2023. "How does natural resource abundance affect green total factor productivity in the era of green finance? Global evidence," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    12. Pei Zhao & Junhua Guo & Yang Wang, 2023. "How Does the Digital Economy Affect Green Development?—Evidence from 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Rui Zhang & Yong Ma & Jie Ren, 2022. "Green Development Performance Evaluation Based on Dual Perspectives of Level and Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-24, July.
    14. Min Ge & Kaili Yu & Ange Ding & Gaofeng Liu, 2022. "Input-Output Efficiency of Water-Energy-Food and Its Driving Forces: Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity of Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Lee, Chien-Chiang & He, Zhi-Wen, 2022. "Natural resources and green economic growth: An analysis based on heterogeneous growth paths," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    16. Wang, Jianda & Dong, Kangyin & Sha, Yezhou & Yan, Cheng, 2022. "Envisaging the carbon emissions efficiency of digitalization: The case of the internet economy for China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    17. Yao Hu & Tai-Hua Yan & Feng-Wen Chen, 2020. "Energy and Environment Performance of Resource-Based Cities in China: A Non-Parametric Approach for Estimating Hyperbolic Distance Function," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Kirikkaleli, Dervis, 2023. "Resource efficiency, energy productivity, and environmental quality in Japan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    19. Nwaila, Glen T. & Bourdeau, Julie E. & Zhang, Steven E. & Chipangamate, Nelson & Valodia, Imraan & Mahboob, Muhammad Ahsan & Lehohla, Thakaramahlaha & Shimaponda-Nawa, Mulundumina & Durrheim, Raymond , 2024. "A systematic framework for compilation of critical raw material lists and their importance for South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    20. Hossain, Md. Emran & Islam, Md. Sayemul & Bandyopadhyay, Arunava & Awan, Ashar & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Rej, Soumen, 2022. "Mexico at the crossroads of natural resource dependence and COP26 pledge: Does technological innovation help?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:13076-:d:1228959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.