IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i16p12501-d1219145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Changes in Epistemological Beliefs and Beliefs about Teaching and Learning: A Mix-Method Study among Chinese Teachers in Transnational Higher Education Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Wang

    (Southampton International College, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
    School of Knowledge Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi 923-1292, Japan)

  • Eunyoung Kim

    (School of Knowledge Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi 923-1292, Japan)

Abstract

When teachers engage in transnational higher education, exposure can challenge their existing beliefs and expand their understanding of effective pedagogical approaches. Collaborative teaching can influence teachers’ beliefs through collaboration and interactions. Thus, this study investigated changes in Chinese university teachers’ epistemological beliefs and beliefs about teaching and learning by addressing the following research questions: Are there any changes across time in beliefs about epistemology, learning, and teaching among teaching faculty members working in transnational higher education (TNHE)? To what extent do epistemological beliefs and beliefs about teaching change among teaching faculty members working in TNHE? Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used during the 2018–2022 academic years. A paired sample t-test revealed significant improvements in constructivist teaching (CT), innate ability (IA), and authority knowledge (AK). The semi-structured group interviews provided supporting evidence. The findings demonstrate that sharing and collaboration can promote changes in teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their beliefs about teaching and learning. Chinese teachers tend to develop more constructivist and student-centered beliefs after working with foreign colleagues. Transnational faculty collaboration promotes professional growth and diverse thoughts. By using mix-method examination of teachers’ epistemological and pedagogical beliefs within the TNHE context, this study provides empirical evidence supporting the development of tailored professional development opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Wang & Eunyoung Kim, 2023. "Exploring Changes in Epistemological Beliefs and Beliefs about Teaching and Learning: A Mix-Method Study among Chinese Teachers in Transnational Higher Education Institutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12501-:d:1219145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12501/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/16/12501/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Gao, 2021. "How Do Language Learning, Teaching, and Transnational Experiences (Re)shape an EFLer’s Identities? A Critical Ethnographic Narrative," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    2. Jing Wang & Eunyoung Kim, 2023. "The Development and Validation of an Instrument to Collaborative Teaching Assessment under the Impact of COVID-19 through the SECI Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12501-:d:1219145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.