Author
Listed:
- Zikai Fan
(College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Xiaoyun Xu
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)
- Rong Wang
(SGIDI Engineering Consulting (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200093, China
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Geo-Environment, Shanghai 200093, China)
- Zhi Meng
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
SGIDI Engineering Consulting (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200093, China)
- Luochun Wang
(College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Xinde Cao
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)
- Ziyang Lou
(School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)
Abstract
It is very important to understand the distribution and sources of typical potentially toxic elements in industrial sites in order to provide essential information for risk assessment and the process of land reclamation selection. Here, around 29 soil column samples of 6 m depth were collected using a geoprobe drill rig from a typical electroplating site located in the Yangtze River Delta, which has been operating for more than 20 years. Analysis in the laboratory, including measurement of elemental concentrations using ICP-OES, was carried out. The distribution and sources of typical heavy metals were investigated, and correlated risks were assessed using positive matrix factorization. As, Pb, and Cr were the dominant heavy metal pollutants, with ranges of 3.20–154 mg/kg, 13.9–9271 mg/kg, and 27.2–2970 mg/kg, which were 1.28 times, 11.6 times, and 3.71 times higher than the Chinese national standard, respectively. Pb was found to be accumulated in the top 0–2 m and As in the top 0–3 m due to the presence of a typical clay and loamy soil. Additionally, Cr could be transferred into the groundwater, with a maximum concentration of 497 mg/kg, due to frequent interaction between the groundwater and soil. A PMF model showed that the dominant sources of pollution were the electroplating process section, the glass melting process section, the production process section, and the electroplating wastewater. Pb, As, and Cr were mainly generated from the industrial production process, glass melting process, and electroplating process. The pH and CEC appeared to influence the chemical speciation greatly, with higher content observed bound to carbonates as a result of exchange processes in the case of high CEC and low pH conditions. Both the Pb and As observed could contribute to non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks, respectively, based on PMF-HRA analysis, which should receive greater attention in risk management strategies for polluted sites. Identification of the main sources of heavy metals in a site could provide a basis for potential land reclamation.
Suggested Citation
Zikai Fan & Xiaoyun Xu & Rong Wang & Zhi Meng & Luochun Wang & Xinde Cao & Ziyang Lou, 2023.
"Distribution and Source Resolution of Heavy Metals in an Electroplating Site and Their Health Risk Assessment,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-12, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12166-:d:1213478
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Yu, Zhenning & She, Shuoqi & Xia, Chuyu & Luo, Jiaojiao, 2023.
"How to solve the dilemma of China’s land fallow policy: Application of voluntary bidding mode in the Yangtze River Delta of China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
- Rui Zhang & Tao Chen & Lijie Pu & Lu Qie & Sihua Huang & Dejing Chen, 2023.
"Current Situation of Agricultural Soil Pollution in Jiangsu Province: A Meta-Analysis,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, February.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12166-:d:1213478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.