IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p12085-d1212201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Green Development and Resilient Cities: A First Insight into Urban Forest Planning in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Battisti

    (Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Lungo Dora Siena 100 A, 10153 Turin, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Aimar

    (Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Polis University, Rruga Bylis 12, 1051 Tirana, Albania
    Research Centre for Rural Development of Hilly Areas, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095 Turin, Italy)

  • Giovanni Giacco

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (DIETI), University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy
    Latitudo 40, Via Emanuele Gianturco, 31/c, 80146 Naples, Italy)

  • Marco Devecchi

    (Research Centre for Rural Development of Hilly Areas, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, Grugliasco, 10095 Turin, Italy
    Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy)

Abstract

The research proposes an application of a modification of the 3–30–300 rule to identify areas that require Urban Forestry implementation in small and medium-sized Roman and/or medieval urban areas. The selected case study is that of Asti in Piedmont, Italy. An open source, cross-platform desktop geographic information system is used to process geospatial datasets via qualitative analyses of electoral sections (or wards). An analysis of the number and distribution of trees around each building is performed, in addition to the calculation of tree canopy cover and distance between buildings and green spaces. Findings reveal that 64 out of 70 wards have an average of at least three trees per building and sufficient green areas of at least 0.5 hectares within 300 m of the buildings. Additionally, the tree canopy cover ranges from approximately 0.6% (lowest) to about 55% (highest) for the electoral sections. Lastly, findings suggest that the highly built-up urban fabric in these areas may significantly affect the availability and quality of green spaces. In conclusion, the case study proves the benefits of applying the 3–30–300 rule to small and medium-sized urban areas using an integrated assessment approach based on nature-based solutions and ecosystem services.

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Battisti & Fabrizio Aimar & Giovanni Giacco & Marco Devecchi, 2023. "Urban Green Development and Resilient Cities: A First Insight into Urban Forest Planning in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12085-:d:1212201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/12085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fabrizio Aimar & Francesca Cavagnino & Marco Devecchi, 2022. "Conservation and Management of Agricultural Landscapes through Expert-Supported Participatory Processes: The “Declarations of Public Interest” in an Italian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:12085-:d:1212201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.