IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i15p11885-d1208939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective and Simulation-Based Analysis of Discomfort Glare Metrics in Office Buildings with Light Shelf Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Faraji

    (Construction Project Management Department, Faculty of Architecture, KHATAM University, Tehran 1991633357, Iran
    School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Fatemeh Rezaei

    (Architecture Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, KHATAM University, Tehran 1991633357, Iran)

  • Payam Rahnamayiezekavat

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Maria Rashidi

    (School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Hossein Soleimani

    (Construction & Building Management Department, KHATAM University, Tehran 1991633357, Iran)

Abstract

Glare is a kind of physiological phenomenon that influences occupants’ visual comfort. Discomfort glare scenes in comparison to other levels of glare have been difficult to estimate and need accurate and reliable metrics. In contemporary architecture, the glass façade is so popular since it can remarkably minimize energy consumption in buildings and maximize daylight utilization as a natural energy. However, it is necessary to consider occupants’ visual discomfort due to the daylighting glare risks during the initial stage of design. Since the measured glare metrics should have an acceptable correlation with the human subject data study, the agreement on the glare indices is complicated. This paper presents a comparison between subjective and simulation-based analysis of discomfort glare metrics in offices with a light shelf system. The discomfort glare metrics considered in this study include Daylight Glare Index (DGI), CIE Glare Index (CGI), Visual Comfort Probability (VCP), Unified Glare Rating (UGR), and Daylight Glare Probability (DGP). The parallel comparison was conducted by using simulation and questionnaire surveys to determine which criteria are more useful under different conditions. According to the findings, DGP yields the most reliable results in different levels of glare based on the subjective analysis and VCP has the lowest accuracy in each stage. UGR also has the highest accuracy rate for evaluating perceptible glare, DGI is applicable for assessing imperceptible glare, and CGI can be an acceptable index for approximating intolerable glare. The study results significantly reduce the complexity of the problem and can provide useful guidance for designers to select the most reliable glare metric based on climatic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Faraji & Fatemeh Rezaei & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat & Maria Rashidi & Hossein Soleimani, 2023. "Subjective and Simulation-Based Analysis of Discomfort Glare Metrics in Office Buildings with Light Shelf Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11885-:d:1208939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Sallal, Khaled A., 2006. "Easing high brightness and contrast glare problems in universal space design studios in the UAE: Real models testing," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 617-630.
    2. Taesub Lim & Woong Seog Yim & Daeung Danny Kim, 2020. "Evaluation of Daylight and Cooling Performance of Shading Devices in Residential Buildings in South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Pilechiha, Peiman & Mahdavinejad, Mohammadjavad & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Carnemolla, Phillippa & Seyedzadeh, Saleh, 2020. "Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    4. Heangwoo Lee, 2020. "A Basic Study on the Performance Evaluation of a Movable Light Shelf with a Rolling Reflector That Can Change Reflectivity to Improve the Visual Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Silvia Ruggiero & Margarita-Niki Assimakopoulos & Rosa Francesca De Masi & Filippo de Rossi & Anastasia Fotopoulou & Dimitra Papadaki & Giuseppe Peter Vanoli & Annarita Ferrante, 2021. "Multi-Disciplinary Analysis of Light Shelves Application within a Student Dormitory Refurbishment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Amirmasood Nakhaee Sharif & Sanaz Keshavarz Saleh & Sadegh Afzal & Niloofar Shoja Razavi & Mozhdeh Fadaei Nasab & Samireh Kadaei & Chun Wei, 2022. "Evaluating and Identifying Climatic Design Features in Traditional Iranian Architecture for Energy Saving (Case Study of Residential Architecture in Northwest of Iran)," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-12, September.
    7. Heangwoo Lee & Xiaolong Zhao & Janghoo Seo, 2021. "A Study of Optimal Specifications for Light Shelves with Photovoltaic Modules to Improve Indoor Comfort and Save Building Energy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin Li & Weihong Guo & Xiao Liu & Yuqing Zhang & Peter John Russell & Marc Aurel Schnabel, 2021. "Sustainable Passive Design for Building Performance of Healthy Built Environment in the Lingnan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    3. Hassan Bazazzadeh & Barbara Świt-Jankowska & Nasim Fazeli & Adam Nadolny & Behnaz Safar ali najar & Seyedeh sara Hashemi safaei & Mohammadjavad Mahdavinejad, 2021. "Efficient Shading Device as an Important Part of Daylightophil Architecture; a Designerly Framework of High-Performance Architecture for an Office Building in Tehran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Ružena Králiková & Laura Džuňová & Ervin Lumnitzer & Miriama Piňosová, 2022. "Simulation of Artificial Lighting Using Leading Software to Evaluate Lighting Conditions in the Absence of Daylight in a University Classroom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Heangwoo Lee & Xiaolong Zhao & Janghoo Seo, 2021. "A Study of Optimal Specifications for Light Shelves with Photovoltaic Modules to Improve Indoor Comfort and Save Building Energy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Friess, Wilhelm A. & Rakhshan, Kambiz, 2017. "A review of passive envelope measures for improved building energy efficiency in the UAE," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 485-496.
    7. Wang, Ran & Lu, Shilei & Feng, Wei, 2020. "Impact of adjustment strategies on building design process in different climates oriented by multiple performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    8. Vítor Leal, 2021. "Buildings Energy Efficiency and Innovative Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-5, August.
    9. Sun, Yanyi & Liu, Xin & Ming, Yang & Liu, Xiao & Mahon, Daniel & Wilson, Robin & Liu, Hao & Eames, Philip & Wu, Yupeng, 2021. "Energy and daylight performance of a smart window: Window integrated with thermotropic parallel slat-transparent insulation material," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    10. Shafaghat, A. & Keyvanfar, A., 2022. "Dynamic façades design typologies, technologies, measurement techniques, and physical performances across thermal, optical, ventilation, and electricity generation outlooks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    11. Tarek M. Kamel & Amany Khalil & Mohammed M. Lakousha & Randa Khalil & Mohamed Hamdy, 2024. "Optimizing the View Percentage, Daylight Autonomy, Sunlight Exposure, and Energy Use: Data-Driven-Based Approach for Maximum Space Utilization in Residential Building Stock in Hot Climates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Rudai Shan & Lars Junghans, 2023. "Multi-Objective Optimization for High-Performance Building Facade Design: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-33, November.
    13. Ahmed Salih Mohammed & Panagiotis G. Asteris & Mohammadreza Koopialipoor & Dimitrios E. Alexakis & Minas E. Lemonis & Danial Jahed Armaghani, 2021. "Stacking Ensemble Tree Models to Predict Energy Performance in Residential Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Ehsan Sorooshnia & Payam Rahnamayiezekavat & Maria Rashidi & Mahsan Sadeghi & Bijan Samali, 2023. "Curve Optimization for the Anidolic Daylight System Counterbalancing Energy Saving, Indoor Visual and Thermal Comfort for Sydney Dwellings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, January.
    15. Afzal, Sadegh & Ziapour, Behrooz M. & Shokri, Afshar & Shakibi, Hamid & Sobhani, Behnam, 2023. "Building energy consumption prediction using multilayer perceptron neural network-assisted models; comparison of different optimization algorithms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    16. Seyedzadeh, Saleh & Pour Rahimian, Farzad & Oliver, Stephen & Rodriguez, Sergio & Glesk, Ivan, 2020. "Machine learning modelling for predicting non-domestic buildings energy performance: A model to support deep energy retrofit decision-making," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    17. Ye Liu & Wanjiang Wang & Zixiao Li & Junkang Song & Zhicheng Fang & Dongbing Pang & Yanhui Chen, 2023. "Daylighting Performance and Thermal Comfort Performance Analysis of West-Facing External Shading for School Office Buildings in Cold and Severe Cold Regions of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, October.
    18. Nari Yoon & Mary Ann Piette & Jung Min Han & Wentao Wu & Ali Malkawi, 2020. "Optimization of Window Positions for Wind-Driven Natural Ventilation Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    19. Razmi, Afshin & Rahbar, Morteza & Bemanian, Mohammadreza, 2022. "PCA-ANN integrated NSGA-III framework for dormitory building design optimization: Energy efficiency, daylight, and thermal comfort," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    20. Mohammed Lami & Faris Al-naemi & Hameed Alrashidi & Walid Issa, 2022. "Quantifying of Vision through Polymer Dispersed Liquid Crystal Double-Glazed Window," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:15:p:11885-:d:1208939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.