IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p11416-d1200463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of Craft Beer Brewing at Different Scales on a Unit Operation Basis

Author

Listed:
  • María Belén Salazar Tijerino

    (Department of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • M. Fernanda San Martín-González

    (Department of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Juan Antonio Velasquez Domingo

    (Department of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Jen-Yi Huang

    (Department of Food Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
    Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

Abstract

Beer brewing is a complex process that comprises many fundamental unit operations. Over the last few years, craft brewing has become very popular, and the number of small-scale commercial brewers has drastically increased. However, due to the use of traditional beer-making methods, energy utilization in craft breweries tends to be inefficient, resulting in poor sustainability. Therefore, there is a necessity for a holistic analysis on the energy profile of craft beer brewing to evaluate its environmental performance on a unit operation basis. In this study, a gate-to-gate life cycle assessment was conducted to analyze and compare the environmental profiles of craft beer brewing, including ale and lager, at commercial (microbrewery) and pilot scales. A process simulation model was developed to estimate the electricity and/or natural gas uses of each unit operation, including heating, mashing, boiling, whirlpool, cooling, fermentation, and maturation. The model accurately predicted the steam use for pilot-scale brewing and the electricity and gas bills of a microbrewery. The beers brewed at the microbrewery scale (21.5-barrel brewhouse) had 2–11-fold lower environmental impacts than those brewed at the pilot scale (1-barrel brewhouse), and lager beer generally produced 11–32% higher impacts than ale. The fermentation and maturation steps in brewing were the major contributors to global warming and terrestrial acidification, whereas the mashing step was predominantly responsible for marine eutrophication. This study provides craft brewers with a useful tool for identifying the hotspots of energy use in their processes and developing potential improvement strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • María Belén Salazar Tijerino & M. Fernanda San Martín-González & Juan Antonio Velasquez Domingo & Jen-Yi Huang, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Craft Beer Brewing at Different Scales on a Unit Operation Basis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11416-:d:1200463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11416/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/11416/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessio Cimini & Mauro Moresi, 2018. "Effect of Brewery Size on the Main Process Parameters and Cradle‐to‐Grave Carbon Footprint of Lager Beer," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1139-1155, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel de Paula Diniz & Monica Carvalho, 2024. "Environmental Repercussions of Craft Beer Production in Northeast Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-12, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel Shin & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Evaluating the Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Craft Beer Industry: An Assessment of Challenges and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Accounting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-30, November.
    2. Shaoran Geng & Kevin Christopher Dorling & Tobias Manuel Prenzel & Stefan Albrecht, 2024. "Grill and Chill: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Private Household Barbecuing in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Jesús Morcillo-Bellido & Alfonso Duran-Heras, 2020. "Sustainability Governance Mechanisms in Supply Chains: An Application in the Retail Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Eugene Yin Cheung Wong & Danny C. K. Ho & Stuart So & Mark Ching‐Pong Poo, 2022. "Sustainable consumption and production: Modelling product carbon footprint of beverage merchandise using a supply chain input‐process‐output approach," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 175-188, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:11416-:d:1200463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.