IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10904-d1191943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in the Producer Service Sector Promote Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yixing Sun

    (School of Business, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 219 Ningliu Road, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Mingyang Zhang

    (Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education & Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Business, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 219 Ningliu Road, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Yicheng Zhu

    (Institute of Climate Economy and Low Carbon Industry, School of Business, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 219 Ningliu Road, Nanjing 210044, China)

Abstract

By exploring feasible pathways for coordinating the ecological environment and economic development, this study investigated the impact of FDI in the producer service sector (SFDI) on green total factor productivity (GTFP) across 20 provinces from 2006 to 2019 in China. We employed a panel data regression model and found that SFDI significantly promotes China’s GTFP, verifying the existence of the “pollution halo” effects of SFDI in China, where GTFP is estimated by the global Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index based on the slack-based measure and directional distance function. We also employed mediating and moderating models to test the mechanism and found that SFDI can affect GTFP through competition, green innovation, and resource allocation mechanisms. Notably, the impact of SFDI on GTFP exhibits regional heterogeneity, with the strongest impact observed in the eastern region, followed by the western region, and the weakest in the central region. Further analysis reveals that the enhancement of environmental regulations and the level of factor marketization can amplify the influence of SFDI. Finally, we offer specific recommendations encompassing the enhancement of openness, improvement of factor markets, and strengthening of environmental regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixing Sun & Mingyang Zhang & Yicheng Zhu, 2023. "Do Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in the Producer Service Sector Promote Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10904-:d:1191943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shuming Ren & Lianqing Li & Yueqi Han & Yu Hao & Haitao Wu, 2022. "The emerging driving force of inclusive green growth: Does digital economy agglomeration work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1656-1678, May.
    2. Robert E. Hall & Charles I. Jones, 1999. "Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(1), pages 83-116.
    3. Latorre, María C. & Yonezawa, Hidemichi & Zhou, Jing, 2018. "A general equilibrium analysis of FDI growth in Chinese services sectors," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 172-188.
    4. Beverelli, Cosimo & Fiorini, Matteo & Hoekman, Bernard, 2017. "Services trade policy and manufacturing productivity: The role of institutions," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 166-182.
    5. Lv, Chengchao & Shao, Changhua & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2021. "Green technology innovation and financial development: Do environmental regulation and innovation output matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Cuiping Yu & Decai Tang & Acheampong Paul Tenkorang & Brandon J. Bethel, 2021. "The Impact of the Opening of Producer Services on the International Competitiveness of Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Bernard Hoekman & Ben Shepherd, 2017. "Services Productivity, Trade Policy and Manufacturing Exports," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 499-516, March.
    8. Yu, Chin-Hsien & Wu, Xiuqin & Zhang, Dayong & Chen, Shi & Zhao, Jinsong, 2021. "Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Tomiura, Eiichi, 2007. "Foreign outsourcing, exporting, and FDI: A productivity comparison at the firm level," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 113-127, May.
    10. Jens Matthias Arnold & Beata Javorcik & Molly Lipscomb & Aaditya Mattoo, 2016. "Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(590), pages 1-39, February.
    11. Priit Vahter & Jaan Masso, 2019. "The contribution of multinationals to wage inequality: foreign ownership and the gender pay gap," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 155(1), pages 105-148, February.
    12. Oleksandr Shepotylo & Volodymyr Vakhitov, 2015. "Services liberalization and productivity of manufacturing firms," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 23(1), pages 1-44, January.
    13. Matthew A. Cole & Robert J.R. Elliott & Jing Zhang, 2011. "Growth, Foreign Direct Investment, And The Environment: Evidence From Chinese Cities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 121-138, February.
    14. Rong, Shu & Liu, Kai & Huang, Si & Zhang, Qi, 2020. "FDI, labor market flexibility and employment in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    15. Manzoor Ahmad & Zeeshan Khan & Zia Ur Rahman & Shoukat Iqbal Khattak & Zia Ullah Khan, 2021. "Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 89-109, January.
    16. Dong-hyun Oh, 2010. "A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 183-197, December.
    17. Maria Bas & Vanessa Strauss-Kahn, 2013. "Input-Trade Liberalization, Export Prices and Quality Upgrading," Working Papers hal-03460775, HAL.
    18. Newman, Carol & Rand, John & Talbot, Theodore & Tarp, Finn, 2015. "Technology transfers, foreign investment and productivity spillovers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 168-187.
    19. Fei Wang & Linwei Ye, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Export Quality of Chinese Products: An Analysis Based on Innovation Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    20. Slesman, Ly & Abubakar, Yazid Abdullahi & Mitra, Jay, 2021. "Foreign direct investment and entrepreneurship: Does the role of institutions matter?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(4).
    21. Syeda Tamkeen Fatima, 2016. "Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: evidence from Turkish micro-level data," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 291-324, June.
    22. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Weber, William L., 2009. "A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 274-287, December.
    23. Doytch, Nadia & Narayan, Seema, 2016. "Does FDI influence renewable energy consumption? An analysis of sectoral FDI impact on renewable and non-renewable industrial energy consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 291-301.
    24. Eleonora Santos, 2023. "FDI and Firm Productivity: A Comprehensive Review of Macroeconomic and Microeconomic Models," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    25. Natalia Zugravu-Soilita, 2017. "How does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Pollution? Toward a Better Understanding of the Direct and Conditional Effects," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 66(2), pages 293-338, February.
    26. Robert Elliott & Ying Zhou, 2013. "Environmental Regulation Induced Foreign Direct Investment," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 55(1), pages 141-158, May.
    27. Dardati, Evangelina & Saygili, Meryem, 2012. "Multinationals and environmental regulation: are foreign firms harmful?," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(2), pages 163-186, April.
    28. Bas, Maria & Strauss-Kahn, Vanessa, 2015. "Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 250-262.
    29. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Sinha, Avik, 2019. "Foreign Direct Investment–CO2 Emissions Nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of Biomass Energy Consumption," MPRA Paper 91729, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Jan 2019.
    30. Sara Amoroso & Bettina Müller, 2018. "The short-run effects of knowledge intensive greenfield FDI on new domestic entry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 815-836, June.
    31. Nuruzzaman, N. & Singh, Deeksha & Pattnaik, Chinmay, 2019. "Competing to be innovative: Foreign competition and imitative innovation of emerging economy firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 1-1.
    32. Sapkota, Pratikshya & Bastola, Umesh, 2017. "Foreign direct investment, income, and environmental pollution in developing countries: Panel data analysis of Latin America," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 206-212.
    33. Bohan Chai & Junwei Gao & Lingying Pan & Yishu Chen, 2021. "Research on the Impact Factors of Green Economy of China—From the Perspective of System and Foreign Direct Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    34. Doytch, Nadia & Uctum, Merih, 2019. "Spillovers from foreign direct investment in services: Evidence at sub-sectoral level for the Asia-Pacific," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 33-44.
    35. Rehman, Faheem Ur & Khan, Muhammad Asif & Khan, Muhammad Atif & Pervaiz, Khansa & Liaqat, Idrees, 2020. "The causal, linear and nonlinear nexus between sectoral FDI and infrastructure in Pakistan: Using a new global infrastructure index," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    36. André Spithoven & Bruno Merlevede, 2023. "The productivity impact of R&D and FDI spillovers: characterising regional path development," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 560-590, April.
    37. Orlic, Edvard & Hashi, Iraj & Hisarciklilar, Mehtap, 2018. "Cross sectoral FDI spillovers and their impact on manufacturing productivity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 777-796.
    38. Yan Li & Yanjiang Wu & Yaqing Chen & Qingbo Huang, 2021. "The influence of foreign direct investment and trade opening on green total factor productivity in the equipment manufacturing industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(57), pages 6641-6654, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhibo Zhao & Jiamin Ren & Zheng Liu, 2023. "How Does Urbanization Affect Carbon Emission Performance? Evidence from 282 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Youyuan Zheng & Zhou Zhou & Fan Zhou, 2024. "The Non-Linear Effect of Dual Environmental Regulation on Urban Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from 284 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beverelli, Cosimo & Fiorini, Matteo & Hoekman, Bernard, 2017. "Services trade policy and manufacturing productivity: The role of institutions," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 166-182.
    2. Zhenghui Li & Hao Dong & Zimei Huang & Pierre Failler, 2019. "Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Jiangfeng Hu & Zhao Wang & Qinghua Huang & Xiaoqin Zhang, 2019. "Environmental Regulation Intensity, Foreign Direct Investment, and Green Technology Spillover—An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Shihong Zeng & Ya Zhou, 2021. "Foreign Direct Investment’s Impact on China’s Economic Growth, Technological Innovation and Pollution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-24, March.
    5. Zhuoran Bai & Shuang Meng & Zhuang Miao & Yan Zhang, 2023. "Liberalization for services foreign direct investment and product mix adjustment: Evidence from Chinese exporting firms," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 363-388, May.
    6. Gao, Kang & Yuan, Yijun, 2021. "The effect of innovation-driven development on pollution reduction: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Stefania Lovo & Gonzalo Varela, 2022. "Internationally Linked Firms and Productivity in Pakistan: A Look at the Top End of the Distribution," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(10), pages 2110-2131, October.
    8. Ronghui Xie & Shengjie Zhang, 2024. "Re†examining the impact of global foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows on haze pollution—considering the moderating mechanism of environmental regulation," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(6), pages 3186-3209, September.
    9. Mustansar, Talreja, 2023. "Financial innovation, technological improvement and bank’ profitability," OSF Preprints 8wy95, Center for Open Science.
    10. Defever, Fabrice & Imbruno, Michele & Kneller, Richard, 2020. "Trade liberalization, input intermediaries and firm productivity: Evidence from China," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Maria Bas & Åsa Johansson & Fabrice Murtin & Giuseppe Nicoletti, 2016. "The effects of input tariffs on productivity: panel data evidence for OECD countries," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 152(2), pages 401-424, May.
    12. Jean Baptiste Habyarimana & Vikas Kakkar, 2023. "Externally funded trade policy reforms and firm productivity: Evidence from a world database of reforms funded by foreign aid agencies," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 196-222, May.
    13. Omar Bamieh & Francesco Bripi & Matteo Fiorini, 2022. "Services trade and labor market outcomes: Evidence from Italian firms," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 673-701, August.
    14. Tan, Ruipeng & Xu, Mengmeng & Qiao, Gang & Wu, Huaqing, 2023. "FDI, financial market development and nonlinearities of energy and environmental efficiency in China: Evidence from both parametric and nonparametric models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Bai, Zhuoran & Meng, Shuang & Miao, Zhuang & Zhang, Yan, 2019. "Services Liberalization and Export Diversity: Theory and Evidence from Chinese Firms," MPRA Paper 95862, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Hoekman, Bernard & Shepherd, Ben, 2021. "Services Trade Policies and Economic Integration: New Evidence for Developing Countries," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 115-134, February.
    17. Huang, Geng & Lin, Xi & He, Ling-Yun, 2023. "Good for the environment? Foreign investment opening in service sector and firm's energy efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    18. Copestake, Alexander & Zhang, Wenzhang, 2023. "Inputs, networks and quality-upgrading: Evidence from China in India," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Xavier Cirera & Daniel Lederman & Juan A. Máñez Castillejo & María E. Rochina Barrachina & Juan A. Sanchis-Llopis, 2021. "Firm productivity gains in a period of slow trade liberalization: evidence from Brazil," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 38(1), pages 57-87, April.
    20. Ha Thi Thanh Doan & Hongyong Zhang, 2024. "Technical barriers to trade, product quality and trade margins: firm-level evidence," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 160(3), pages 785-811, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10904-:d:1191943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.