IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i14p10771-d1190177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentive Mechanism of Utility Tunnel PPP Projects with User Involvement

Author

Listed:
  • Haiyan He

    (School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
    School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

Abstract

Users of utility tunnel public–private partnership (PPP) projects are productive corporate entities with a specific scope, a limited quantity, and strong bargaining power. They possess the ability and motivation to participate in PPP projects through equity investments. Tunnel PPP projects involving user participation are implemented jointly by consortia comprising construction contractors and users. Given that the government, construction contractors, and users have different interests, significant conflicts of interest arise among them. Furthermore, there exists dual information asymmetry between the government and construction contractors, as well as between the government and users. The government lacks a direct observation of the true ability endowments of construction contractors and users prior to signing PPP contracts, and it cannot directly observe the effort levels exerted by the construction contractors and users after contract signing. The combination of dual information asymmetry and conflicting interests may result in adverse selection and moral hazard on the part of construction contractors and users. Drawing on principal–agent theory, this study constructed incentive models with and without user involvement, examined the impact of user involvement on the effort level of construction contractors and the performance of PPP projects, and designed a reasonable incentive mechanism. The objective is to ensure that construction contractors and users truthfully report their ability endowments during the bidding stage and exert optimal efforts during the construction and operation stages. This research provides new insights for promoting the sustainable development of tunnel PPP projects. A case analysis of a PT tunnel PPP project and an SC tunnel PPP project demonstrates the reasonableness and feasibility of the research findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Haiyan He, 2023. "Incentive Mechanism of Utility Tunnel PPP Projects with User Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10771-:d:1190177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10771/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/14/10771/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sreekumar R. Bhaskaran & V. Krishnan, 2009. "Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1152-1169, July.
    2. Akintola Akintoye & Cliff Hardcastle & Matthias Beck & Ezekiel Chinyio & Darinka Asenova, 2003. "Achieving best value in private finance initiative project procurement," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 461-470.
    3. Wenqiang Xiao & Yi Xu, 2012. "The Impact of Royalty Contract Revision in a Multistage Strategic R&D Alliance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2251-2271, December.
    4. Gregory, Robin & Fischhoff, Baruch & Thorne, Sarah & Butte, Gordon, 2003. "A multi-channel stakeholder consultation process for transmission deregulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1291-1299, September.
    5. Richard Burke & Istemi Demirag, 2017. "Risk transfer and stakeholder relationships in Public Private Partnerships," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 28-43, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Han Zhang & Hujun Li & Xiaosu Ye, 2023. "Research on the Influences of Task Interdependence on Team Performance in the Context of the Leader–Member Exchange Differentiation in the Public–Private Partnership Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qiao & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zaccour, Georges & Tang, Wansheng, 2018. "Strategic technology licensing in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 162-175.
    2. Shantanu Bhattacharya & Vibha Gaba & Sameer Hasija, 2015. "A Comparison of Milestone-Based and Buyout Options Contracts for Coordinating R&D Partnerships," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 963-978, May.
    3. Vishal Agrawal & Nektarios Oraiopoulos, 2020. "The Role of Decision Rights in Codevelopment Initiatives," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 832-849, July.
    4. Pascale Crama & Bert De Reyck & Niyazi Taneri, 2017. "Licensing Contracts: Control Rights, Options, and Timing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1131-1149, April.
    5. Lütkemeyer, Daniel & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wuttke, David A., 2021. "Overcoming inefficiencies in the development of personalized medicine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 278-296.
    6. Niyazi Taneri & Arnoud De Meyer, 2017. "Contract Theory: Impact on Biopharmaceutical Alliance Structure and Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 453-471, July.
    7. Yu, Xinning & Lan, Yanfei & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2021. "Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: Vertical collaboration or co-development?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Jingqi Wang & Xiaole Wu & Viswanathan Krishnan, 2018. "Decision Structure and Performance of Networked Technology Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 199-216, May.
    9. Lütkemeyer, Daniel & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wuttke, David A. & Gernert, Andreas K., 2022. "Pricing and market entry decisions in personalized medicine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    10. Aydin, Ayhan & Parker, Rodney P., 2018. "Innovation and technology diffusion in competitive supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1102-1114.
    11. Yu, Xinning & Lan, Yanfei & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation royalty contract design in research and development alliances: Help vs. knowledge-sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 740-754.
    12. Limin Su & Yongchao Cao & Wenjuan Zhang, 2023. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Operation Decisions and Coordination Strategies Considering the Consumers’ Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    13. Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi & Mohamed Alhashemi & Florence Yean Yng Ling & Mohan Kumaraswamy, 2010. "The execution of public-private partnership projects in the UAE," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 393-402.
    14. Jun-bin Wang & Lufei Huang, 2021. "A Game-Theoretic Analytical Approach for Fostering Energy-Saving Innovation in the Electric Vehicle Supply Chain," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    15. Jen-Ming Chen & Hung-Liang Cheng, 2012. "Effect of the price-dependent revenue-sharing mechanism in a decentralized supply chain," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(2), pages 299-317, June.
    16. Lutz Kaufmann & Jens Esslinger & Craig R. Carter, 2018. "Toward Relationship Resilience: Managing Buyer‐Induced Breaches of Psychological Contracts During Joint Buyer–Supplier Projects," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(4), pages 62-85, October.
    17. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Xu, Hao & Zhang, Quanpeng, 2017. "Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 433-442.
    18. Nizkorodov, Evgenia, 2021. "Evaluating risk allocation and project impacts of sustainability-oriented water public–private partnerships in Southern California: A comparative case analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    19. Xu, Hao & Chen, Liuxin & Ma, Lijun, 2024. "Supply chain product innovation and marketing strategies under different fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Dawid, Herbert & Hellmann, Tim, 2020. "R&D investments under endogenous cluster formation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 253-283.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:14:p:10771-:d:1190177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.