IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v31y2003i12p1291-1299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-channel stakeholder consultation process for transmission deregulation

Author

Listed:
  • Gregory, Robin
  • Fischhoff, Baruch
  • Thorne, Sarah
  • Butte, Gordon

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregory, Robin & Fischhoff, Baruch & Thorne, Sarah & Butte, Gordon, 2003. "A multi-channel stakeholder consultation process for transmission deregulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1291-1299, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:31:y:2003:i:12:p:1291-1299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(02)00188-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin Gregory & Tim McDaniels & Daryl Fields, 2001. "Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 415-432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. E. Keskitalo, 2009. "Governance in vulnerability assessment: the role of globalising decision-making networks in determining local vulnerability and adaptive capacity," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 185-201, February.
    2. Stocker, Volker & Whalley, Jason, 2019. "Who replies to consultations, and what do they say? The case of broadband universal service in the UK," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1-1.
    3. Fremeth, Adam R. & Holburn, Guy L.F., 2020. "The impact of political directors on corporate strategy for government-owned utilities: Evidence from Ontario's electricity distribution sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    4. Eefje Cuppen, 2012. "Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 23-46, March.
    5. Haiyan He, 2023. "Incentive Mechanism of Utility Tunnel PPP Projects with User Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baudry, Gino & Delrue, Florian & Legrand, Jack & Pruvost, Jérémy & Vallée, Thomas, 2017. "The challenge of measuring biofuel sustainability: A stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 933-947.
    2. Palola, Pirta & Bailey, Richard & Wedding, Lisa, 2022. "A novel framework to operationalise value-pluralism in environmental valuation: Environmental value functions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    3. Stefan A. Hajkowicz, 2012. "For the Greater Good? A Test for Strategic Bias in Group Environmental Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 331-344, May.
    4. B. M. Kellett & R. I. Beilin & K. L. Bristow & G. Moore & F. H. S. Chiew, 2007. "Reflecting on stakeholders’ perceptions in an Ecological Risk Assessment workshop: Lessons for practitioners," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 109-117, March.
    5. I. Linkov & F. K. Satterstrom & G. Kiker & T. P. Seager & T. Bridges & K. H. Gardner & S. H. Rogers & D. A. Belluck & A. Meyer, 2006. "Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Comprehensive Decision Approach for Management of Contaminated Sediments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 61-78, February.
    6. Failing, L. & Gregory, R. & Harstone, M., 2007. "Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 47-60, October.
    7. Luis Loures & Thomas Panagopoulos & Jon Bryan Burley, 2016. "Assessing user preferences on post-industrial redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(5), pages 871-892, September.
    8. Laura Ogden, 2006. "Public participation in environmental decision-making: a case study of ecosystem restoration in South Florida," Post-Print hal-01201128, HAL.
    9. Scodanibbio, Lucia, 2011. "Opening a policy window for organisational change and full-cost accounting: The creation of BC Hydro's water use planning program," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 1006-1015, March.
    10. Cuppen, Eefje & Breukers, Sylvia & Hisschemöller, Matthijs & Bergsma, Emmy, 2010. "Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 579-591, January.
    11. repec:sae:envval:v:11:y:2002:i:4:p:461-488 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Ogden, Laura, 2003. "Public participation in environmental decision-making: a case study of ecosystem restoration in South FloridaPublic participation in environmental decision-making: a case study of ecosystem restoratio," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 80.
    13. Laura Ogden, 2006. "Public participation in environmental decision-making: a case study of ecosystem restoration in South Florida," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 80, pages 53-73.
    14. Mikael Klintman, 2009. "Participation in Green Consumer Policies: Deliberative Democracy under Wrong Conditions?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 43-57, March.
    15. Timothy McDaniels, 2021. "Four Decades of Transformation in Decision Analytic Practice for Societal Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 491-502, March.
    16. Baran, E. & Jantunen, T. & Chheng, P., 2006. "Developing a consultative Bayesian model for integrated management of aquatic resources: an inland coastal zone case study," IWMI Books, Reports H039117, International Water Management Institute.
    17. Marleen Kerkhof, 2006. "Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 39(3), pages 279-299, September.
    18. Joseph Árvai & Delanie Kellon & Ramón León & Robin Gregory & Robert Richardson, 2014. "Structuring international development decisions: confronting trade-offs between land use and community development in Costa Rica," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 224-236, June.
    19. L. Robin Keller & Craig W. Kirkwood & Nancy S. Jones, 2010. "Assessing stakeholder evaluation concerns: An application to the Central Arizona water resources system," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 58-71, March.
    20. Robin Gregory & Baruch Fischhoff & Tim McDaniels, 2005. "Acceptable Input: Using Decision Analysis to Guide Public Policy Deliberations," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 4-16, March.
    21. Hao Fanghua & Chen Guanchun, 2010. "A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Model Based on Weighted Borda Scoring Method for Watershed Ecological Risk Management: a Case Study of Three Gorges Reservoir Area of China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(10), pages 2139-2165, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:31:y:2003:i:12:p:1291-1299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.