IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10209-d1180890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Waste Collection Incentivization Scheme Based on the Blockchain

Author

Listed:
  • Ala Abdulsalam Alarood

    (College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia)

  • Adamu Abubakar

    (Department of Computer Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 53100, Malaysia)

  • Abdulrahman Alzahrani

    (College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia)

  • Faisal S. Alsubaei

    (Department of Cybersecurity, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 21959, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The approaches of motivating people for the collection of electronic waste (e-waste) are often insufficient due to inadequate methods of given incentives. Prior research studies have been carried out to tackle the issue of e-waste management in a broad sense. The findings of those studies indicated diverse strategies, each of which is relevant solely to a restricted range of electronic e-waste reprocessing circumstances. The current study has presented a proposed technique for incentivizing tasks and activities associated with the collection of e-waste through the adoption of the vector space technique. The method this research undertakes lies with utilizing blockchain smart contract technology. The reason for selecting this approach lies with the mapping of tasks, the nature of activities, and their magnitude, in order to derived an incentive. While the vector space model defines the set of tasks with their corresponding incentives, blockchain smart contract maps them together and establishes them in a record. Experimental scenarios for the calculation of incentives are presented; the findings reveal that among many scenarios of allocating incentives for e-waste collection, the best case is by utilizing a weighting scale scheme where each task and activity is mapped to its associated incentive rather than providing fixed incentive values. Ethereum was used as a digital token for each unit of incentive. This concept has contributed in encouraging personal accountability in the management of e-waste collection in order to cultivate sustainable behaviors for a long-term solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Ala Abdulsalam Alarood & Adamu Abubakar & Abdulrahman Alzahrani & Faisal S. Alsubaei, 2023. "Electronic Waste Collection Incentivization Scheme Based on the Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10209-:d:1180890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10209/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10209/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Salman Shooshtarian & Tayyab Maqsood & Peter SP Wong & Malik Khalfan & Rebecca J. Yang, 2021. "Extended Producer Responsibility in the Australian Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Krishnamoorthy Mageshwaran & Nazeek Alessa & Singaravelu Gopinath & Karuppusamy Loganathan, 2023. "Topological Indices of Graphs from Vector Spaces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Eugénie Joltreau, 2022. "Extended Producer Responsibility, Packaging Waste Reduction and Eco-design," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 527-578, November.
    4. Tongyao Feng & Shuangliang Tai & Chengshuang Sun & Qingpeng Man, 2017. "Study on Cooperative Mechanism of Prefabricated Producers Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingxia Xue & Fang Liu & Guangbin Wang & Jungang Shao, 2023. "Research on Strategy Evolution of Contractor and Resident in Construction Stage of Old Community Renovation Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Xin Zan & Deyuan Zhang, 2022. "Analysis on the Optimal Recycling Path of Chinese Lead-Acid Battery under the Extended Producer Responsibility System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Antonis A. Zorpas & Maria K. Doula & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2021. "Waste Strategies Development in the Framework of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-5, December.
    4. Zhen Liu & Tzuhui Wu & Fenghong Wang & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2022. "Blockchain Enhanced Construction Waste Information Management: A Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-35, September.
    5. Xi Sun & Karsten Neuhoff, 2024. "Realizing the Value of Recycling – Assessing the Elements of a Policy Package," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2069, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska, 2023. "Sustainability in the Development of Green Organizations Based on the Example of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Moon, DongWhoi & Wang, H. Holly & Hao, Na, 2023. "Consumer behavior in choosing microplastic contaminated seafood across different countries: The role of cultural and attitudinal factors," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 290-306.
    8. Karima AFIF & Bocar Samba BA & Eugénie JOLTREAU, 2024. "Tax-subsidy schemes for recycling when quantity and quality of waste matter," Working Papers 2024.02, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    9. Tang Seik Yng & Wong Swee Kiong, 2023. "E-Waste Management in Malaysia: Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Household E-Waste Recycling in Kuching, Sarawak," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(11), pages 1383-1401, November.
    10. Marcella Bernardo & Hugh Forehead & Isabella De Carvalho Vallin & Sylmara L. F. Gonçalves-Dias, 2023. "Management of Household Plastic Waste in Wollongong, Australia: The Role of Selective Waste Collection Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Danish Iqbal Godil & George Thomas & Muhammad Tanveer & Hafiz Muhammad Zia-ul-haq & Haider Mahmood, 2021. "The Decision-Making Analysis on End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling and Remanufacturing under Extended Producer Responsibility Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10209-:d:1180890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.