IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10112-d1179542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on an Evaluation Model of Urban Seismic Resilience Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Chengdu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xunchang Li

    (Department of Safety Engineering, School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Yifan Liu

    (Department of Safety Engineering, School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Wenyong Zhang

    (China Electric Power Construction Group East China Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310000, China)

  • Yaqian Wang

    (Department of Safety Engineering, School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710000, China)

Abstract

In response to the frequent occurrence of earthquakes in Chengdu, which poses a great threat to the economy, social development, production, and people’s lives, in this study, we construct an index evaluation system and a system dynamics model for urban seismic resilience based on an analysis of the interaction between earthquake disasters and the urban system. Four types of schemes, namely, the current continuity type, economic development type, government intervention type, and resilience construction type, were designed, and the dynamic evaluation and simulation prediction of Chengdu’s seismic resilience capacity under each scheme were conducted. The research results show that, compared with the other three schemes, the resilience construction type has better universality and expansibility in terms of improving Chengdu’s seismic resilience. Therefore, it is necessary to maintain a certain level of economic development, to attach importance to the construction of monitoring and warning systems, and to strive to improve emergency rescue capabilities and disaster awareness education. The model and evaluation indicators have strong applicability, and the research results can provide a theoretical reference for the evaluation of seismic resilience in Chengdu.

Suggested Citation

  • Xunchang Li & Yifan Liu & Wenyong Zhang & Yaqian Wang, 2023. "Research on an Evaluation Model of Urban Seismic Resilience Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10112-:d:1179542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10112/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10112/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandru Banica & Lucian Rosu & Ionel Muntele & Adrian Grozavu, 2017. "Towards Urban Resilience: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability in Iasi City (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Liu, Wei & Song, Zhaoyang & Ouyang, Min & Li, Jie, 2020. "Recovery-based seismic resilience enhancement strategies of water distribution networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liudan Jiao & Bowei Han & Qilin Tan & Yu Zhang & Xiaosen Huo & Liu Wu & Ya Wu, 2024. "An Improved DPSIR-DEA Assessment Model for Urban Resilience: A Case Study of 105 Large Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hao, Yucheng & Jia, Limin & Zio, Enrico & Wang, Yanhui & Small, Michael & Li, Man, 2023. "Improving resilience of high-speed train by optimizing repair strategies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Liu, Juncai & Tian, Li & Yang, Meng & Meng, Xiangrui, 2024. "Probabilistic framework for seismic resilience assessment of transmission tower-line systems subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    3. Yu, Juanya & Sharma, Neetesh & Gardoni, Paolo, 2024. "Functional connectivity analysis for modeling flow in infrastructure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Liu, Huan & Tatano, Hirokazu & Pflug, Georg & Hochrainer-Stigler, Stefan, 2021. "Post-disaster recovery in industrial sectors: A Markov process analysis of multiple lifeline disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Dui, Hongyan & Zhu, Yawen & Tao, Junyong, 2024. "Multi-phased resilience methodology of urban sewage treatment network based on the phase and node recovery importance in IoT," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Li Long & Huaping Yang & Shansuo Zheng & Yonglong Cai, 2024. "Seismic Resilience Evaluation of Urban Multi-Age Water Distribution Systems Considering Soil Corrosive Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Jiale Zhu & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Yanan Chen & Yijun Liu & Huanan Liu, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Seismic Risk Assessment Based on Combined Weight-TOPSIS Model and CF-Logistic Regression Model—A Case Study of Songyuan City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Jia, Rui & Du, Kun & Song, Zhigang & Xu, Wei & Zheng, Feifei, 2024. "Scenario reduction-based simulation method for efficient serviceability assessment of earthquake-damaged water distribution systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    9. Jing Liu & Huapu Lu & He Ma & Wenzhi Liu, 2017. "Network Vulnerability Analysis of Rail Transit Plans in Beijng-Tianjin-Hebei Region Considering Connectivity Reliability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Xu, Min & Ouyang, Min & Hong, Liu & Mao, Zijun & Xu, Xiaolin, 2022. "Resilience-driven repair sequencing decision under uncertainty for critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Ibolya Török, 2018. "Qualitative Assessment of Social Vulnerability to Flood Hazards in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Morshedi, Mohamad Ali & Kashani, Hamed, 2022. "Assessment of vulnerability reduction policies: Integration of economic and cognitive models of decision-making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Houli Wu & Endong Guo & Peilei Yan & Jingyi Liu, 2023. "A Quantitative Evaluation Model for the Seismic Resilience of Water Supply Systems Based on Fragility Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    14. Yasser Ebrahimian Ghajari & Ali Asghar Alesheikh & Mahdi Modiri & Reza Hosnavi & Morteza Abbasi, 2017. "Spatial Modelling of Urban Physical Vulnerability to Explosion Hazards Using GIS and Fuzzy MCDA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-29, July.
    15. Mottahedi, Adel & Sereshki, Farhang & Ataei, Mohammad & Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri & Barabadi, Abbas, 2021. "Resilience estimation of critical infrastructure systems: Application of expert judgment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Dui, Hongyan & Liu, Meng & Song, Jiaying & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "Importance measure-based resilience management: Review, methodology and perspectives on maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Blake Byron Walker & Nadine Schuurman & David Swanlund & John J. Clague, 2021. "GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for earthquake response: a case study of expert opinion in Vancouver, Canada," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(2), pages 2075-2091, January.
    18. Zhang, Mingyuan & Yang, Xiangjie & Zhang, Juan & Li, Gang, 2022. "Post-earthquake resilience optimization of a rural “road-bridge†transportation network system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Cao, Quoc Dung & Miles, Scott B. & Choe, Youngjun, 2022. "Infrastructure recovery curve estimation using Gaussian process regression on expert elicited data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Amanda Melendez & David Caballero-Russi & Mariantonieta Gutierrez Soto & Luis Felipe Giraldo, 2022. "Computational models of community resilience," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(2), pages 1121-1152, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10112-:d:1179542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.