IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9376-d1168001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergo–Economic and Parametric Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from Taji Gas Turbines Power Plant Using Rankine Cycle and Organic Rankine Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Alaa Fadhil Kareem

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk 78050, Turkey)

  • Abdulrazzak Akroot

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk 78050, Turkey)

  • Hasanain A. Abdul Wahhab

    (Training and Workshop Center, University of Technology-Iraq, Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research, Baghdad 10066, Iraq)

  • Wadah Talal

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk 78050, Turkey)

  • Rabeea M. Ghazal

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk 78050, Turkey)

  • Ali Alfaris

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karabuk University, Karabuk 78050, Turkey)

Abstract

This study focused on exergo–conomic and parametric analysis for Taji station in Baghdad. This station was chosen to reduce the emission of waste gases that pollute the environment, as it is located in a residential area, and to increase the production of electric power, since for a long time, Iraq has been a country that has suffered from a shortage of electricity. The main objective of this work is to integrate the Taji gas turbine’s power plant, which is in Baghdad, with the Rankine cycle and organic Rankine cycle to verify waste heat recovery to produce extra electricity and reduce emissions into the environment. Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic assessment of the combined Brayton cycle–Rankine cycle/Organic Rankin cycle (GSO CC) system, considering the three objective functions of the First- and Second-Law efficiencies and the total cost rates of the system, were applied. According to the findings, 258.2 MW of power is produced from the GSO CC system, whereas 167.3 MW of power is created for the Brayton cycle (BC) under the optimum operating conditions. It was demonstrated that the overall energy and exergy efficiencies, respectively, are 44.37% and 42.84% for the GSO CC system, while they are 28.74% and 27.75%, respectively, for the Brayton cycle. The findings indicate that the combustion chamber has the highest exergy degradation rate. The exergo–economic factor for the entire cycle is 37%, demonstrating that the cost of exergy destruction exceeds the cost of capital investment. Moreover, the cost of the energy produced by the GSO CC system is USD 9.03/MWh, whereas it is USD 8.24/MWh for BC. The results also indicate that the network of the GSO CC system decreases as the pressure ratio increases. Nonetheless, the GSO CC system’s efficiencies and costs increase with a rise in the pressure ratio until they reach a maximum and then decrease with further pressure ratio increases. The increase in the gas turbine inlet temperature and isentropic efficiency of the air compressor and gas turbine enhances the thermodynamic performance of the system; however, a further increase in these parameters increases the overall cost rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Alaa Fadhil Kareem & Abdulrazzak Akroot & Hasanain A. Abdul Wahhab & Wadah Talal & Rabeea M. Ghazal & Ali Alfaris, 2023. "Exergo–Economic and Parametric Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery from Taji Gas Turbines Power Plant Using Rankine Cycle and Organic Rankine Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9376-:d:1168001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9376/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9376/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadeghi, Mohsen & Chitsaz, Ata & Marivani, Parisa & Yari, Mortaza & Mahmoudi, S.M.S., 2020. "Effects of thermophysical and thermochemical recuperation on the performance of combined gas turbine and organic rankine cycle power generation system: Thermoeconomic comparison and multi-objective op," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Pierobon, Leonardo & Nguyen, Tuong-Van & Larsen, Ulrik & Haglind, Fredrik & Elmegaard, Brian, 2013. "Multi-objective optimization of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery: Application in an offshore platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 538-549.
    3. Chennaif, Mohammed & Zahboune, Hassan & Elhafyani, Mohammed & Zouggar, Smail, 2021. "Electric System Cascade Extended Analysis for optimal sizing of an autonomous hybrid CSP/PV/wind system with Battery Energy Storage System and thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    4. Roy, J.P. & Mishra, M.K. & Misra, Ashok, 2010. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 5049-5062.
    5. Hasanain A. Abdul Wahhab & Hussain H. Al-Kayiem, 2021. "Environmental Risk Mitigation by Biodiesel Blending from Eichhornia crassipes : Performance and Emission Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Qiu, K. & Entchev, E., 2020. "Development of an organic Rankine cycle-based micro combined heat and power system for residential applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le, Van Long & Kheiri, Abdelhamid & Feidt, Michel & Pelloux-Prayer, Sandrine, 2014. "Thermodynamic and economic optimizations of a waste heat to power plant driven by a subcritical ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) using pure or zeotropic working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 622-638.
    2. Danish, Syed Noman & Al-Ansary, Hany & El-Leathy, Abdelrahman & Ba-Abbad, Mazen & Khan, Salah Ud-Din & Rizvi, Arslan & Orfi, Jamel & Al-Nakhli, Ahmed, 2022. "Experimental and techno-economic analysis of two innovative solar thermal receiver designs for a point focus solar Fresnel collector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    3. Seyed Mohammad Seyed Mahmoudi & Ramin Ghiami Sardroud & Mohsen Sadeghi & Marc A. Rosen, 2022. "Integration of Supercritical CO 2 Recompression Brayton Cycle with Organic Rankine/Flash and Kalina Cycles: Thermoeconomic Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    4. d'Amore-Domenech, Rafael & Leo, Teresa J. & Pollet, Bruno G., 2021. "Bulk power transmission at sea: Life cycle cost comparison of electricity and hydrogen as energy vectors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    5. Fabien Marty & Sylvain Serra & Sabine Sochard & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2019. "Exergy Analysis and Optimization of a Combined Heat and Power Geothermal Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Wang, Zhen & Duan, Liqiang & Zhang, Zuxian, 2022. "Multi-objective optimization of gas turbine combined cycle system considering environmental damage cost of pollution emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    7. Huang, Z.F. & Wan, Y.D. & Soh, K.Y. & Islam, M.R. & Chua, K.J., 2022. "Off-design and flexibility analyses of combined cooling and power based liquified natural gas (LNG) cold energy utilization system under fluctuating regasification rates," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    8. Kim, Dong Kyu & Lee, Ji Sung & Kim, Jinwoo & Kim, Mo Se & Kim, Min Soo, 2017. "Parametric study and performance evaluation of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system using low-grade heat at temperatures below 80°C," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 55-65.
    9. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    10. Khaljani, M. & Khoshbakhti Saray, R. & Bahlouli, K., 2015. "Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization of an integrated gas turbine and organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2136-2145.
    11. Emrani, Anisa & Berrada, Asmae & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Optimal sizing and deployment of gravity energy storage system in hybrid PV-Wind power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 12-27.
    12. Pashchenko, Dmitry, 2023. "Hydrogen-rich gas as a fuel for the gas turbines: A pathway to lower CO2 emission," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Baccioli, A. & Antonelli, M. & Desideri, U., 2017. "Technical and economic analysis of organic flash regenerative cycles (OFRCs) for low temperature waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 69-87.
    14. Guillermo Valencia Ochoa & Carlos Acevedo Peñaloza & Jorge Duarte Forero, 2019. "Thermoeconomic Optimization with PSO Algorithm of Waste Heat Recovery Systems Based on Organic Rankine Cycle System for a Natural Gas Engine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Ge, Zhong & Wang, Hua & Wang, Hui-Tao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Li, Ming & Wu, Fu-Zhong & Zhang, Song-Yuan, 2015. "Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 1886-1895.
    16. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    17. Liu, Hongtao & Zhai, Rongrong & Patchigolla, Kumar & Turner, Peter & Yu, Xiaohan & Wang, Peng, 2023. "Multi-objective optimisation of a thermal-storage PV-CSP-wind hybrid power system in three operation modes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    18. Fu, Jianqin & Liu, Jingping & Ren, Chengqin & Wang, Linjun & Deng, Banglin & Xu, Zhengxin, 2012. "An open steam power cycle used for IC engine exhaust gas energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 544-554.
    19. He, Maogang & Zhang, Xinxin & Zeng, Ke & Gao, Ke, 2011. "A combined thermodynamic cycle used for waste heat recovery of internal combustion engine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 6821-6829.
    20. Li, Tailu & Fu, Wencheng & Zhu, Jialing, 2014. "An integrated optimization for organic Rankine cycle based on entransy theory and thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 561-573.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9376-:d:1168001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.