IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p9020-d1162865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digitalization Effect on Business Performance: Role of Business Model Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaozhi Wang

    (School of Economics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China
    Department of Management, Concord University College, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Shoufu Lin

    (School of Economics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)

  • Yang Chen

    (School of Economics, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)

  • Oleksii Lyulyov

    (Department of Marketing, Sumy State University, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine
    Department of Applied Management, WSB University in Dabrowa Gornicza, 41300 Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland)

  • Tetyana Pimonenko

    (Department of Marketing, Sumy State University, 40007 Sumy, Ukraine
    Department of Applied Management, WSB University in Dabrowa Gornicza, 41300 Dabrowa Gornicza, Poland)

Abstract

Digitalization has become a key driver of business innovation in recent years. It provides businesses with new opportunities to innovate and create value. Digital technologies, such as cloud computing, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence, have helped businesses boost the development of new products and services, optimize their operations, and improve customer engagement. This study aimed to analyze the impact of digitalization on business performance within business innovation. This study applied an ordinary least square regression model and an intermediary to explore relationship in the chain of digital capability–business model innovation–company performance. The object of investigation was 1663 listed A-share companies Shanghai and Shenzhen in the software and information technology service sectors. The results showed that digital capabilities could be divided into three dimensions according to the hierarchical relationship: (1) basic digital capabilities, (2) digital operation capabilities, and (3) digital integration capabilities, all of which significantly positively affected enterprise performance. Furthermore, while business model innovation significantly positively affected corporate performance, it was also driven by the preceding variables of digital capabilities. Business model innovation enhanced the positive impact of basic digital capabilities, digital operation capabilities, and digital integration capabilities on company’s performance. Considering the empirical results, this study underlines that the government should promote digital skills development, create supportive regulatory environments, promote access to funding for innovations, foster partnerships between businesses and technology providers, and promote collaboration between businesses, which are conducive to extending digitalization within the business innovation model and improving business performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaozhi Wang & Shoufu Lin & Yang Chen & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Digitalization Effect on Business Performance: Role of Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9020-:d:1162865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/9020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mazaher Kianpour & Stewart J. Kowalski & Harald Øverby, 2021. "Systematically Understanding Cybersecurity Economics: A Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-28, December.
    2. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    3. Yurii Kharazishvili & Aleksy Kwilinski & Olena Grishnova & Henryk Dzwigol, 2020. "Social Safety of Society for Developing Countries to Meet Sustainable Development Standards: Indicators, Level, Strategic Benchmarks (with Calculations Based on the Case Study of Ukraine)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Yang, Chen & Zhao, Shuqing, 2022. "Urban vertical profiles of three most urbanized Chinese cities and the spatial coupling with horizontal urban expansion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Latifi, Mohammad-Ali & Nikou, Shahrokh & Bouwman, Harry, 2021. "Business model innovation and firm performance: Exploring causal mechanisms in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Radosław Miśkiewicz & Krzysztof Matan & Jakub Karnowski, 2022. "The Role of Crypto Trading in the Economy, Renewable Energy Consumption and Ecological Degradation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Yurii Kharazishvili & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksandr Sukhodolia & Henryk Dzwigol & Dmytro Bobro & Janusz Kotowicz, 2021. "The Systemic Approach for Estimating and Strategizing Energy Security: The Case of Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Christoph Zott & Raphael Amit, 2007. "Business Model Design and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 181-199, April.
    9. Piotr W. Saługa & Krzysztof Zamasz & Zdzisława Dacko-Pikiewicz & Katarzyna Szczepańska-Woszczyna & Marcin Malec, 2021. "Risk-Adjusted Discount Rate and Its Components for Onshore Wind Farms at the Feasibility Stage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-12, October.
    10. Hussain, Matloub & Papastathopoulos, Avraam, 2022. "Organizational readiness for digital financial innovation and financial resilience," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anton Boyko & Andrew Zimbroff & Serhii Mynenko & Yang Chen, 2024. "Anti-Money Laundering in the Digital Economy: Institutional, Financial, and Educational Channels," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 7(3), pages 59-80, September.
    2. Huifang Liu & Jin-Sup Jung, 2024. "Impact of Digital Transformation on ESG Management and Corporate Performance: Focusing on the Empirical Comparison between Korea and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Iryna Nyenno & Vyacheslav Truba & Liudmyla Tokarchuk, 2023. "Managerial Future of the Artificial Intelligence," Virtual Economics, The London Academy of Science and Business, vol. 6(2), pages 72-88, June.
    4. Zhen Liu & Yixin Liu & Mohamed Osmani, 2024. "Integration of Smart City Technology and Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-30, June.
    5. Marcela Marçal Alves Pinto Mick & João Luiz Kovaleski & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli, 2024. "Sustainable Digital Transformation Roadmaps for SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radoslaw Miskiewicz, 2022. "Clean and Affordable Energy within Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Governance Digitalization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Henryk Dzwigol & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "The Role of Environmental Regulations, Renewable Energy, and Energy Efficiency in Finding the Path to Green Economic Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Inclusive Economic Growth: Relationship between Energy and Governance Efficiency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Henryk Dzwigol & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Renewable Energy, Knowledge Spillover and Innovation: Capacity of Environmental Regulation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "Greenfield Investment as a Catalyst of Green Economic Growth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Yana Us & Tetyana Pimonenko & Oleksii Lyulyov, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Renewable Energy Development for the Green Brand within SDGs: A Meta-Analytic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Christofi, Michael & Zahoor, Nadia & Hadjielias, Elias & Adomako, Samuel, 2024. "Business model innovation and international performance of emerging market international businesses," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    8. Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksii Lyulyov & Tetyana Pimonenko, 2023. "The Effects of Urbanisation on Green Growth within Sustainable Development Goals," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Hock-Doepgen, Marianne & Clauss, Thomas & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng, 2021. "Knowledge management capabilities and organizational risk-taking for business model innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 683-697.
    10. Aleksandra Kuzior & Aleksy Kwilinski & Ihor Hroznyi, 2021. "The Factorial-Reflexive Approach to Diagnosing the Executors’ and Contractors’ Attitude to Achieving the Objectives by Energy Supplying Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    12. Meena Madhavan & Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "Impact of Business Model Innovation on Sustainable Performance of Processed Marine Food Product SMEs in Thailand—A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-33, August.
    13. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    14. Shuting Chen & Dengke Yu, 2024. "What Drives Business Model Innovation? Exploring the Role of Knowledge Management Capability in Chinese Top-Ranking Innovative Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 6390-6424, June.
    15. Gupta, Shivam & Modgil, Sachin & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Kumar, Ajay & Antony, Jiju, 2023. "Influences of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology on financial resilience of supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    16. Li, Guo & Xue, Jing & Li, Na & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2022. "Blockchain-supported business model design, supply chain resilience, and firm performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    17. Cristina Fernandes & João J. Ferreira & Mário L. Raposo & Cristina Estevão & Marta Peris-Ortiz & Carlos Rueda-Armengot, 2017. "The dynamic capabilities perspective of strategic management: a co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(1), pages 529-555, July.
    18. Shi, Xianwei & Liang, Xingkun & Luo, Yining, 2023. "Unpacking the intellectual structure of ecosystem research in innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    19. Suliman Ben Ghrbeia & Ahmad Alzubi, 2024. "Building Micro-Foundations for Digital Transformation: A Moderated Mediation Model of the Interplay between Digital Literacy and Digital Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-28, April.
    20. Symeonidou, Noni & Leiponen, Aija & Autio, Erkko & Bruneel, Johan, 2022. "The origins of capabilities: Resource allocation strategies, capability development, and the performance of new firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:9020-:d:1162865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.