IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8936-d1161852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Trends in Preschool Literacy (PL) Based on Bibliometric Analysis: Progress and Prospects

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyun Xiao

    (School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Fadzilah Amzah

    (School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Noor Azlina Mohamed Khalid

    (School of the Arts, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Weihan Rong

    (School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

Abstract

Preschool literacy (PL) is a critical period in the development of children’s literacy skills, which has a significant impact on their reading ability and academic achievement. In this context, there is a fragmentation of knowledge as PL involves different disciplines such as education, psychology, and linguistics. This is despite the existence of a large body of literature on PL. However, many studies focus on specific topics, which makes it difficult for researchers to gain a comprehensive understanding of the current status, research hotspots, and trends in PL research, leaving a knowledge gap. Therefore, this study adopts a quantitative research approach for the literature data between 1992 and 2022 for a period of thirty years. This study used arithmetic in Microsoft Excel and bibliometric visualization tools, including VOSviewer and Biblioshiny. The aim was to analyze the current situation, trends, and future development of literacy at the preschool level, providing a scientific basis for preschool practice and policy development. An analysis was performed on 1208 screened documents from the Scopus database in Excel, resulting in the identification of annual publication trends, the 20 most cited documents, the 15 most productive authors, the top 10 institutions, and the 20 countries with the highest number of publications. Visual collaborative networks and co-occurrence analysis maps via VOSviewer and Bibliometrix were also conducted. The study found that the number of research papers published on PL has shown a steadily increasing trend, that the United States is a pioneer in the field of preschool literacy and is increasingly collaborating and researching with other countries, and that international connections are growing between publications and authors. Furthermore, preschool institutions, teachers, and families have positive attitudes towards preschool literacy, as reflected in theoretical research, teaching practice, and sustainable knowledge construction. Meanwhile, the findings of this study also revealed that new PL research has been extended to emerging literacy skills, family-based literacy models, and literacy intervention models. Future researchers can benefit from this study by increasing collaborative research that can sustainably add to the body of knowledge and improving the sustainability of PL.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyun Xiao & Fadzilah Amzah & Noor Azlina Mohamed Khalid & Weihan Rong, 2023. "Global Trends in Preschool Literacy (PL) Based on Bibliometric Analysis: Progress and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8936-:d:1161852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8936/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8936/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aria, Massimo & Cuccurullo, Corrado, 2017. "bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 959-975.
    2. Branco Ponomariov & Craig Boardman, 2016. "What is co-authorship?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1939-1963, December.
    3. Chen Wang & Li Si, 2023. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Literacy Research from 1990 to 2022 and Research on Emerging Themes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Aurora González-Teruel & Gregorio González-Alcaide & Maite Barrios & María-Francisca Abad-García, 2015. "Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(2), pages 687-705, May.
    5. Ole Ellegaard & Johan A. Wallin, 2015. "The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1809-1831, December.
    6. Jonathan Adams, 2005. "Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 63(3), pages 567-581, June.
    7. Ihmeideh, Fathi & Al-Maadadi, Fatima, 2020. "The effect of family literacy programs on the development of children’s early literacy in kindergarten settings," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lucy Semerjian & Kunle Okaiyeto & Mike O. Ojemaye & Temitope Cyrus Ekundayo & Aboi Igwaran & Anthony I. Okoh, 2021. "Global Systematic Mapping of Road Dust Research from 1906 to 2020: Research Gaps and Future Direction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Manta Eduard Mihai & Davidescu Adriana Ana Maria & Geambasu Maria Cristina & Florescu Margareta Stela, 2023. "Exploring the research area of direct taxation. An empirical analysis based on bibliometric analysis results," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(s1), pages 355-383, December.
    3. Albiona Pestisha & Zoltán Gabnai & Aidana Chalgynbayeva & Péter Lengyel & Attila Bai, 2023. "On-Farm Renewable Energy Systems: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Davidescu, Adriana AnaMaria & Petcu, Monica Aureliana & Curea, Stefania Cristina & Manta, Eduard Mihai, 2022. "Two faces of the same coin: Exploring the multilateral perspective of informality in relation to Sustainable Development Goals based on bibliometric analysis," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 683-705.
    5. Di Vaio, Assunta & Palladino, Rosa & Pezzi, Alberto & Kalisz, David E., 2021. "The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 220-231.
    6. Teerasak Charoennapharat & Poti Chaopaisarn, 2022. "Factors Affecting Multimodal Transport during COVID-19: A Thai Service Provider Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Mohammad Ashraful Mobin & Masnun Mahi & M. Kabir Hassan & Marzia Habib & Shabiha Akter & Tahmina Hassan, 2023. "An analysis of COVID-19 and WHO global research roadmap: knowledge mapping and future research agenda," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(1), pages 35-56, March.
    8. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea & Ruggeri, Matteo, 2023. "Telemedicine as technoinnovation to tackle COVID-19: A bibliometric analysis," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Stephany Isabel Vallarta-Serrano & Edgar Santoyo-Castelazo & Edgar Santoyo & Esther O. García-Mandujano & Holkan Vázquez-Sánchez, 2023. "Integrated Sustainability Assessment Framework of Industry 4.0 from an Energy Systems Thinking Perspective: Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-30, July.
    10. Saulo Folharini & António Vieira & António Bento-Gonçalves & Sara Silva & Tiago Marques & Jorge Novais, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis on Wildfires and Protected Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Ricardo Rodrigues & Carlos Sampaio & Paulo Duarte & José Manuel Hernández-Mogollón, 2022. "Cross-Border Innovation: Assessing Concepts, Contexts, and Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Qian Wang & Shixian Luo & Jiao Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Increased Attention to Smart Development in Rural Areas: A Scientometric Analysis of Smart Village Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Meiqi Zhang & Fang Li & Dongyu Wang & Xiaohong Ba & Zhan Liu, 2022. "Mapping Research Trends from 20 Years of Publications in Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Bo Liu & Wei Song & Zhan Meng & Xinwei Liu, 2023. "Review of Land Use Change Detection—A Method Combining Machine Learning and Bibliometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Goodell, John W. & Kumar, Satish & Lahmar, Oumaima & Pandey, Nitesh, 2023. "A bibliometric analysis of cultural finance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Tabak, Benjamin Miranda & Silva, Thiago Christiano & Fiche, Marcelo Estrela & Braz, Tércio, 2021. "Citation likelihood analysis of the interbank financial networks literature: A machine learning and bibliometric approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    17. Saïd Echchakoui, 2020. "Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: the case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(3), pages 165-184, September.
    18. Ashraf, Rohail & Khan, Muhammad Asif & Khuhro, Rafique Ahmed & Bhatti, Zeeshan Ahmed, 2022. "Knowledge creation dynamics of technological forecasting and social change special issues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Oğuzhan Öztürk & Rıdvan Kocaman & Dominik K. Kanbach, 2024. "How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(11), pages 3333-3361, November.
    20. Trotta, Annarita & Rania, Francesco & Strano, Eugenia, 2024. "Exploring the linkages between FinTech and ESG: A bibliometric perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8936-:d:1161852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.