IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8814-d1159544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Efficient Mobility and Emissions: Click and Collect vs. Grocery Deliveries in Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Maren Schnieder

    (Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Chris Hinde

    (Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Andrew West

    (Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

Abstract

Online grocery shopping is an emerging market. It caused visible growth in last mile delivery services, which has resulted in concerns about its external effects (e.g., pollution, land use, congestion). The study outlined in this paper proposes a grocery delivery concept where goods are transported by train to the customer’s nearest station, and then the consumer either picks up the groceries (i.e., click and collect) or the goods are delivered to the customer’s home, or to a locker. The focus of this paper is primarily based on the last mile delivery part of the supply chain (i.e., from the train station to the customer). The land use efficiency and emissions of each delivery concept have been evaluated based on the time-area concept and the Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport (HBEFA 4.1), respectively. This large-scale simulation considers every household in Switzerland with various levels of demand and supermarket network densities. Two machine learning techniques (i.e., random forest and decision tree) have been used to categorise all neighbourhoods within Switzerland based on the best delivery method in terms of emissions and land efficiency. The results show that, depending on the scenarios (e.g., 10 or 100% of the households taking part), home delivery can be better for 76–89% of these communities when compared with a click and collect option based on their land use efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Maren Schnieder & Chris Hinde & Andrew West, 2023. "Land Efficient Mobility and Emissions: Click and Collect vs. Grocery Deliveries in Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8814-:d:1159544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8814/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8814/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Carlos Martín & Francesca Pagliara & Concepción Román, 2019. "The Research Topics on E-Grocery: Trends and Existing Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Olumekor & Harman Preet Singh & Ibrahim Abdullah Alhamad, 2024. "Online Grocery Shopping: Exploring the Influence of Income, Internet Access, and Food Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Engelbrecht & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Kilian Bizer & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2021. "The Virtual Online Supermarket: An Open-Source Research Platform for Experimental Consumer Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Luyi Qiu & Aro I & Timothy J. Lee & Jinok Susanna Kim, 2021. "How Sustainable Social Media Advertising Affect Visitors’ Decision to Attend a Festival Event?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & de Oliveira Leite Nascimento, Carla & Aziz, Soukaina & Ayagah, Prince & Montero, Tania, 2024. "The environmental impact of buying groceries online/offline pre and during COVID-19. Any changes?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 222-233.
    4. Magalhães, David José Ahouagi Vaz de, 2021. "Analysis of critical factors affecting the final decision-making for online grocery shopping," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. de Kervenoael, Ronan & Schwob, Alexandre & Chandra, Careen, 2020. "E-retailers and the engagement of delivery workers in urban last-mile delivery for sustainable logistics value creation: Leveraging legitimate concerns under time-based marketing promise," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Ligorio, Lorenzo & Venturelli, Andrea & Caputo, Fabio, 2022. "Tracing the boundaries between sustainable cities and cities for sustainable development. An LDA analysis of management studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Léon Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and usage of E-grocery shopping: A context-specific UTAUT2 model," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/324918, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    8. Xinhai Lu & Yanwei Zhang & Chaoran Lin & Feng Wu, 2021. "Evolutionary Overview and Prediction of Themes in the Field of Land Degradation," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Mar Vazquez-Noguerol & Jose Comesaña-Benavides & Raul Poler & J. Carlos Prado-Prado, 2022. "An optimisation approach for the e-grocery order picking and delivery problem," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 961-990, September.
    10. Mkansi, Marcia & Nsakanda, Aaron Luntala, 2021. "Leveraging the physical network of stores in e-grocery order fulfilment for sustainable competitive advantage," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    11. Soukaina Aziz & Ila Maltese & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta & Rachid Benmoussa & El Hassan Irhirane, 2022. "Energy Consumption and Environmental Impact of E-Grocery: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Maltese, Ila & Le Pira, Michela & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Evangelinos, Christos, 2021. "Grocery or @grocery: A stated preference investigation in Rome and Milan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Ronan de Kervenoael & Alexandre Schwob & Careen Chandra, 2020. "E-retailers and the engagement of delivery workers in urban last-mile delivery for sustainable logistics value creation: Leveraging legitimate concerns under time-based marketing promise," Post-Print hal-02780647, HAL.
    14. Budziński, Wiktor & Daziano, Ricardo, 2023. "Preferences for online grocery shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic — the role of fear-related attitudes," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    15. Veronica S Ülgen & Maria Björklund & Niklas Simm & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Inter-Organizational Supply Chain Interaction for Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Haili Yang & Yueyue Luo & Yunhua Qiu & Jiantao Zou & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Abdullah Mohammed Ibrahim, 2023. "Modeling the Enablers of Consumers’ E-Shopping Behavior: A Multi-Analytic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    17. Ellen Van Droogenbroeck & Leo Van Hove, 2021. "Adoption and Usage of E-Grocery Shopping: A Context-Specific UTAUT2 Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, April.
    18. Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Ila Maltese & Gabriele Iannaccone & Jiarui Fan, 2021. "E-Groceries: A Channel Choice Analysis in Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Lukas Hardi & Ulrich Wagner, 2019. "Grocery Delivery or Customer Pickup—Influences on Energy Consumption and CO 2 Emissions in Munich," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8814-:d:1159544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.