IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8749-d1158495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on How to Improve the Accountability of National Defense Financial Information for Government Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Kyoungkook Lim

    (College of Business, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea)

  • Giseok Nam

    (College of Business, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul 02450, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Accrual-based accounting enables external users to make informed decisions by reporting an accounting entity’s management performance to them. It also helps managers accurately record resource usage and increase efficiency. Despite the Republic of Korea’s expectations for the introduction of accrual-based accounting in national accounting from 2011, aimed at achieving efficient resource management comparable to private companies, the results of the audit by the Board of Audit and Inspection indicate that the settlement of accruals in national accounting is still insufficient. This paper examines whether the financial reports compiled are suitable for competition in decentralized organizations. We present the status of accrual-based accounting in the Ministry of National Defense and analyze the actual cost index to control the efficient use of defense resources and financial information. For our analysis, we compared and analyzed the costs of two divisions and seven brigades in the Ministry of National Defense using cash-based budget spending and the actual cost index based on accrual basis, using data from the defense accounting system in 2015 and 2016. We found that the comparison result between the nominal cost and actual cost index was different. In particular, the actual cost index reflects the degree of control of the decision-maker who manages the resource. Our results show that evaluating the efficiency of resource management units in the Ministry of National Defense using the actual cost index can improve the Ministry’s accountability and achieve the purpose of introducing double-entry bookkeeping.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyoungkook Lim & Giseok Nam, 2023. "A Study on How to Improve the Accountability of National Defense Financial Information for Government Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8749-:d:1158495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James L. Chan, 2003. "Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 13-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatma Ben Slama, 2024. "International Public Sector Accounting Standards and Economic Growth: An International Study of IPSAS Adoption and Experience," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 483-506, September.
    2. Nicolae Marinescu, 2016. "Spillover Effects From Foreign Direct Investment To Local Smes. An Empirical Study," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    3. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    4. Antonella Paolini & Michela Soverchia, 2013. "Le universit? statali italiane verso la contabilit? economico-patrimoniale ed il controllo di gestione," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 77-98.
    5. Biondi, Yuri, 2008. "De Charybde de la comptabilité de caisse en Scylla de la comptabilité patrimoniale," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 3.
    6. Sabrina Gigli & Marco Tieghi, 2017. "La riforma del sistema informativo-contabile degli atenei italiani. Una proposta di analisi del nuovo modello di bilancio," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1), pages 61-90.
    7. Oana Adriana Gica & Cristina Ioana Balint, 2016. "Tourism Globalization. The Case Of Romania," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    8. Andrei-Razvan Crisan & Cristina Silvia Nistor & Adriana Tiron-Tudor & Tudor Oprisor, 2016. "Ipsas Implementation And Perspectives For Epsas Implementation At The European Union Local Government Levels," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    9. Hyndman, Noel & Liguori, Mariannunziata & Meyer, Renate E. & Polzer, Tobias & Rota, Silvia & Seiwald, Johann, 2014. "The translation and sedimentation of accounting reforms. A comparison of the UK, Austrian and Italian experiences," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 388-408.
    10. Carolyn J. Cordery & Kevin Simpkins, 2016. "Financial reporting standards for the public sector: New Zealand's 21st-century experience," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 209-218, April.
    11. Mari Kobayashi & Kiyoshi Yamamoto & Keiko Ishikawa, 2016. "The Usefulness of Accrual Information in Non‐mandatory Environments: The Case of Japanese Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 153-161, June.
    12. Alessandro Lombrano & Luca Zanin, 2013. "IPSAS and local government consolidated financial statements—proposal for a territorial consolidation method," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 429-436, November.
    13. Bercea Oana Bianca & Laura Bacali & Elena-Simina Lakatos, 2016. "Public Marketing: A Strategic Tool for Social Economy," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 11(1), pages 13-21, June.
    14. Grzegorz Bucior & Aleksandra Zurawik, 2022. "The Autonomy of Public Sector Units in the Process of Formulating Accounting Policy – Evidence from Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 555-581.
    15. Syarifuddin, 2018. "Accrual Basis Landscape: The Absence of Political Will in Preventing Dysfunctional Behaviour in Indonesia," GATR Journals afr160, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    16. J. Christiaens & C. Vanhee & F. Manes-Rossi & N. Aversano, 2013. "The Effect of IPSAS on Reforming Governmental Financial Reporting: an International Comparison," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 13/845, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    17. Alessandro Lombrano, 2021. "Dall?armonizzazione alla standardizzazione contabile. Quale via per la riforma degli ordinamenti contabili europei," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(3), pages 7-31.
    18. Linus Axén & Torbjörn Tagesson & Denis Shcherbinin & Azra Custovic & Anna Ojdanic, 2019. "Does municipal ownership affect audit fees?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(3), pages 693-713, September.
    19. Chandrasiri Abeysinghe & Dinushika Samanthi, 2016. "Accrual Basis and Political Interest in Public Sector Accounting. The Case of a Municipal Council in Sri Lanka," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 58-68, July.
    20. Rajat Deb, 2018. "Financial Audit or Forensic Audit? Government Sector Panorama," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 11(2), pages 135-158, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8749-:d:1158495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.