IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i11p8709-d1157872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Potential Co-Benefit of Air Quality Improvement on Cultural Heritage in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ximo Wang

    (Beijing Climate Change Response Research and Education Center, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Huimin Li

    (Beijing Climate Change Response Research and Education Center, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Yufei Wang

    (Department for Consulting and Research, Management World Journal, Beijing 100026, China)

  • Xiaofan Zhao

    (Division of Public Policy, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Atmospheric pollutants can corrode heritage materials, especially stone, which can cause a great loss that goes far beyond the economic losses of the degraded materials. Over the past decades, conventional air pollutants have been slashed owing to clean air actions in China, which produces a significant co-benefit for heritage conservation. However, the benefits may be offset by increases in the photochemical oxidants in smog, such as ozone, which damage heritage materials. This study employed dose–response functions to quantify the impacts of air pollutants on the surface recession of the limestone of heritage structures in China, and assessed the potential benefits of air quality improvement for heritage conservation. The results show that the annual recession rate decreased from 9.69 μmy −1 in 2006 to 6.71 μmy −1 in 2020, resulting in a 41.4% increase in the number of heritage sites meeting the ICP Materials (International Co-operative Program on Effects on Materials including Historic and Cultural Monuments) control target of 8 µmy −1 for 2020. The air quality improvement avoided CNY 136.2 million in heritage site maintenance costs. The recession risk shows distinct regional differences; the southern and northwest regions are still at a higher material corrosion level than the northern and Qinghai–Tibet regions. Nationwide, PM 10 (particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 10 μm) is the main risk factor responsible for the surface recession of limestone material of heritage structures in China. The study provides evidence for the benefits of air quality improvement for heritage conservation. Further, the study also puts forward policy recommendations for heritage conservation, including assessing pollution risk, promoting heritage conservation through social sustainability, and implementing differentiated conservation strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ximo Wang & Huimin Li & Yufei Wang & Xiaofan Zhao, 2023. "Quantifying the Potential Co-Benefit of Air Quality Improvement on Cultural Heritage in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8709-:d:1157872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8709/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/11/8709/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bo Xiao & Lanyu Ning & Zixiang Lin & Shiyi Wang & Hua Zang, 2022. "The Impact of Air Pollution on the Protection of World Cultural Heritage in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:11:p:8709-:d:1157872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.