IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8434-d1153117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ecological and Economic Effects of Applying the Future Agricultural Production Structure Model (FAPSMS): The Case Study of the Barička River Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Nikola Tričković

    (Forestry and Game Management Resource Institute, Strnady 136, 25202 Jíloviště, Czech Republic)

  • Vukašin Rončević

    (Institute of Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Njegoševa 12, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nikola Živanović

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Tara Grujić

    (Institute of Soil Science, Teodora Drajzera 7, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Luka Stefanović

    (Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamycka 129, 16500 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic)

  • Nikola Jovanović

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Miodrag Zlatić

    (Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Kneza Višeslava 1, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

It is necessary to harmonize the needs of society in terms of agricultural production and land protection from various forms of degradation throughout sustainable land management. Assessing the justification of investment in sustainable management of land resources is an important step in this process. Consequently, an analysis of soil erosion risk was carried out in the suburban area of the morphological unit of the Barička river watershed, using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) method, with the existing and projected structure of agricultural production according to the Future Agricultural Production Structure Model from the Aspect of Preserving Land Resources for Mountain Catchment Areas of Serbia (FAPSMS). The value of the existing and projected production structure from an economic aspect was also examined using dynamic economic methods. In order to assess the risk and uncertainty of investments, a sensitive analysis of dynamic methods was carried out. The results show that soil erosion losses are already below tolerance values with the existing production structure and that they could be reduced even more by applying the designed structure. Economic indicators show that the investment is justified and that it is more sensitive to changes in income.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikola Tričković & Vukašin Rončević & Nikola Živanović & Tara Grujić & Luka Stefanović & Nikola Jovanović & Miodrag Zlatić, 2023. "Ecological and Economic Effects of Applying the Future Agricultural Production Structure Model (FAPSMS): The Case Study of the Barička River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8434-:d:1153117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8434/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8434/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ephraim Nkonya & Alisher Mirzabaev & Joachim von Braun (ed.), 2016. "Economics of Land Degradation and Improvement – A Global Assessment for Sustainable Development," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-319-19168-3, December.
    2. Prabuddh Kumar Mishra & Aman Rai & Kamal Abdelrahman & Suresh Chand Rai & Anuj Tiwari, 2021. "Analysing Challenges and Strategies in Land Productivity in Sikkim Himalaya, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Tomáš Seeman & Karel Šrédl & Marie Prášilová & Roman Svoboda, 2020. "The Price of Farmland as a Factor in the Sustainable Development of Czech Agriculture (A Case Study)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Félicien Majoro & Umaru Garba Wali & Omar Munyaneza & François-Xavier Naramabuye, 2023. "Sustainability Analysis of Soil Erosion Control in Rwanda: Case Study of the Sebeya Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Wiesemann, Wolfram & Kuhn, Daniel & Rustem, Berç, 2010. "Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 356-367, April.
    7. Qiang Tang & Chansheng He & Xiubin He & Yuhai Bao & Ronghua Zhong & Anbang Wen, 2014. "Farmers’ Sustainable Strategies for Soil Conservation on Sloping Arable Lands in the Upper Yangtze River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 855-866.
    2. Rostami, Salim & Creemers, Stefan & Leus, Roel, 2024. "Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty: Activity delays and dynamic policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 16-24.
    3. Zvirgzdiņš Jānis & Plotka Kaspars & Geipele Sanda, 2018. "Eco-Economics in Cities and Rural Areas," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 6(1), pages 88-99, July.
    4. Diane L. Haase & Karma Bouzza & Lucy Emerton & James B. Friday & Becca Lieberg & Arnulfo Aldrete & Anthony S. Davis, 2021. "The High Cost of the Low-Cost Polybag System: A Review of Nursery Seedling Production Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Azamat Azarov & Roy C. Sidle & Dietrich Darr & Vladimir Verner & Zbynek Polesny, 2024. "A Proposed Typology of Farming Systems for Assessing Sustainable Livelihood Development Pathways in the Tien Shan Mountains of Kyrgyzstan," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Bruni, Maria Elena & Hazır, Öncü, 2024. "A risk-averse distributionally robust project scheduling model to address payment delays," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(2), pages 398-407.
    7. Wakjira Takala Dibaba & Dessalegn Geleta Ebsa, 2022. "Identifying Erosion Hot Spot Areas And Evaluation Of Best Management Practices In The Toba Watershed, Ethiopia," Water Conservation & Management (WCM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 30-38, February.
    8. Lamas, Patricio & Goycoolea, Marcos & Pagnoncelli, Bernardo & Newman, Alexandra, 2024. "A target-time-windows technique for project scheduling under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 792-806.
    9. Tilahun Amede & Aggie Asiimwe Konde & Jean Jacques Muhinda & George Bigirwa, 2023. "Sustainable Farming in Practice: Building Resilient and Profitable Smallholder Agricultural Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Petan Hamazakaza & Gillian Kabwe & Elias Kuntashula & Anthony Egeru & Robert Asiimwe, 2022. "Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Intensification in Maize-Based Farming Systems of Katete District in Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Muok, Benard Oula & Mosberg, Marianne & Eriksen, Siri Ellen Hallstrøm & Ong'ech, Dennis Onyango, 2021. "The politics of forest governance in a changing climate: Political reforms, conflict and socio-environmental changes in Laikipia, Kenya," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Marchioni, Andrea & Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2018. "Investment decisions and sensitivity analysis: NPV-consistency of rates of return," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 361-372.
    13. Karolina Pawlak & Luboš Smutka & Pavel Kotyza, 2021. "Agricultural Potential of the EU Countries: How Far Are They from the USA?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Qamer Ridwan & Zishan Ahmad Wani & Mohd Hanief & Shreekar Pant & Ali Asghar Shah & Sazada Siddiqui & Saad Alamri, 2023. "Indigenous Knowledge and Perception of Local People towards Biodiversity Conservation in Rajouri District of Jammu and Kashmir, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    15. Purushothaman Chirakkuzhyil Abhilash, 2021. "Restoring the Unrestored: Strategies for Restoring Global Land during the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (UN-DER)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Emmanuel Damilola Aweda & Appollonia Aimiosino Okhimamhe & Rotimi Oluseyi Obateru & Alina Schürmann & Mike Teucher & Christopher Conrad, 2024. "Assessing the Impacts of Migration on Land Degradation in the Savannah Region of Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Urbano, Eva M. & Martinez-Viol, Victor & Kampouropoulos, Konstantinos & Romeral, Luis, 2021. "Energy equipment sizing and operation optimisation for prosumer industrial SMEs – A lifetime approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    18. Christina N. Burt & Lou Caccetta, 2014. "Equipment Selection for Surface Mining: A Review," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 143-162, April.
    19. Petković, Dalibor & Shamshirband, Shahaboddin & Kamsin, Amirrudin & Lee, Malrey & Anicic, Obrad & Nikolić, Vlastimir, 2016. "Survey of the most influential parameters on the wind farm net present value (NPV) by adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1270-1278.
    20. Wakjira Takala Dibaba & Tamene Adugna Demissie & Konrad Miegel, 2021. "Prioritization of Sub-Watersheds to Sediment Yield and Evaluation of Best Management Practices in Highland Ethiopia, Finchaa Catchment," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8434-:d:1153117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.