IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8181-d1149549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Utility Model Patent Quality on Export Performance in China: A Moderated Mediation Effect Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ran Ma

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Xiaodan Kong

    (College of Customs and Public Administration, Shanghai Customs College, Shanghai 201315, China)

  • Mianqing Wang

    (School of Law, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Xiangde Kong

    (School of Business, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China)

Abstract

Utility model patent quality is vital for emerging countries to cultivate a strong domestic market and increase openness. Given China’s high-quality development, this study incorporates enterprise utility model patent quality and export domestic value-added rate (DVAR) into a unified analysis framework to explore their relationship using authorized patent data and financial and customs data of Chinese industrial enterprises from 2002 to 2014. The utility model patent data used to support this study’s findings were provided by the Incopat Patent Database, while the enterprise financial data and customs data were supplied by the RESSET Database. The empirical results show that: (i) utility model patent quality significantly contributes to enterprises’ export DVAR; (ii) factor-intensive heterogeneous analysis indicates that the utility model patent quality of capital-intensive enterprises has a more significant promotion effect on DVAR; (iii) the price–cost markup and the relative price of intermediate goods are crucial domestic channels for utility model patent quality to promote DVAR; and (iv) market segmentation moderates the mediating role of the domestic intermediate relative price. Therefore, the government should further improve the utility model system, focus on increasing domestic market advantages, and develop industry-specific patent guidance policies. This study contributes to the literature by exploring the influence of utility model patent quality on enterprises’ DVAR using an optimized utility model quality index, providing policy references for optimizing China’s utility model patent system and upgrading the import gains of enterprises. However, this study has some limitations, and future research should strengthen the subdivision of utility model patents in different industries and explore the economic performance of the combination of inventions and utility models.

Suggested Citation

  • Ran Ma & Xiaodan Kong & Mianqing Wang & Xiangde Kong, 2023. "The Impact of Utility Model Patent Quality on Export Performance in China: A Moderated Mediation Effect Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8181-:d:1149549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8181/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8181/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basma Hamrouni & Abdelhabib Bourouis & Ahmed Korichi & Mohsen Brahmi, 2021. "Explainable Ontology-Based Intelligent Decision Support System for Business Model Design and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Jan De Loecker & Frederic Warzynski, 2012. "Markups and Firm-Level Export Status," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(6), pages 2437-2471, October.
    3. Kim, Yee Kyoung & Lee, Keun & Park, Walter G. & Choo, Kineung, 2012. "Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 358-375.
    4. Suman Lodh & Maria Rosa Battaggion, 2015. "Technological breadth and depth of knowledge in innovation: the role of mergers and acquisitions in biotech," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(2), pages 383-415.
    5. Ahn, JaeBin & Khandelwal, Amit K. & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2011. "The role of intermediaries in facilitating trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 73-85, May.
    6. Luigi Aldieri & Mohsen Brahmi & Bruna Bruno & Concetto Paolo Vinci, 2021. "Circular Economy Business Models: The Complementarities with Sharing Economy and Eco-Innovations Investments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Arthur Lewbel, 1997. "Constructing Instruments for Regressions with Measurement Error when no Additional Data are Available, with an Application to Patents and R&D," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1201-1214, September.
    8. Anh Ngoc Mai & Huong Van Vu & Bien Xuan Bui & Tuyen Quang Tran, 2019. "The lasting effects of innovation on firm profitability: panel evidence from a transitional economy," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 3417-3436, January.
    9. Chin-Yi Chen & Ching-Lin Chu & Hui-Chung Che & Hong-Wen Tsai, 2022. "Using Patent Drawings to Differentiate Stock Return Rate of China Listed Companies. A Study on China Patent Species of Utility Model Grant," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 1-1.
    10. Hiau Looi Kee & Heiwai Tang, 2016. "Domestic Value Added in Exports: Theory and Firm Evidence from China," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(6), pages 1402-1436, June.
    11. Upward, Richard & Wang, Zheng & Zheng, Jinghai, 2013. "Weighing China’s export basket: The domestic content and technology intensity of Chinese exports," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 527-543.
    12. Gaglio, Cyrielle & Kraemer-Mbula, Erika & Lorenz, Edward, 2022. "The effects of digital transformation on innovation and productivity: Firm-level evidence of South African manufacturing micro and small enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Koopman, Robert & Wang, Zhi & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2012. "Estimating domestic content in exports when processing trade is pervasive," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 178-189.
    14. Maskus, Keith E. & McDaniel, Christine, 1999. "Impacts of the Japanese patent system on productivity growth," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 557-574, December.
    15. Kui Wang & Jintang Wang & Shiye Mei & Shasha Xiong, 2020. "How Does Technology Import and Export Affect the Innovative Performance of Firms? From the Perspective of Emerging Markets Firms," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, June.
    16. Peixin Li & Lixia Li & Yichun Xie & Xueliang Zhang, 2021. "Investigating the effects of market segmentation on firm survival and their heterogeneities in China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2614-2634, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Chuanwang & Zhan, Yanhong & Gao, Xiang, 2023. "Does environmental regulation increase domestic value-added in exports? An empirical study of cleaner production standards in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Du, Yan & Yan, Jie & Cao, Fangzhou & Li, Yifei & Zhou, Mao, 2023. "Higher education expansion and domestic value added in exports: Theory and evidence from China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2022. "Emission Reduction and Value-added Export Nexus at Firm Level," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 22-19, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    4. Xinheng Liu & Ziyuan Pan & Dongli Fang, 2023. "Agglomeration, resource reallocation and domestic value‐added ratio in exports," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(1), pages 182-213, March.
    5. Bao, Xiaohua & Gao, Lei & Jin, Yu & Sun, Jin, 2023. "Industrial agglomeration and firm exports: Micro-evidence based on input-output linkages," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Yajun Zhu & Churen Sun, 2022. "Carbon Reduction, Pollution Intensity, and Firms’ Ratios of Value Added in Exports: Evidence from China’s Low-Carbon Pilot Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, October.
    7. Yan Du & Yi Lu, 2018. "The Great Opening up and the Roadmap for the Future: The Story of China's International Trade," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 26(2), pages 68-93, March.
    8. Gaoju Yang & Yilu Zhang & Xiao Yu, 2020. "Intellectual property rights and the upgrading of the global value chain status," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 185-204, May.
    9. Yuping Deng & Yanrui Wu & Helian Xu, 2023. "Emission reduction and value‐added export nexus at firm level," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1670-1710, June.
    10. Manova, Kalina & Yu, Zhihong, 2017. "Multi-product firms and product quality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 116-137.
    11. Bie, Xiaodong & Ciani, Andrea, 2021. "Born similar, develop apart: Evidence on Chinese hybrid exporters," DICE Discussion Papers 364, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    12. Julien Gourdon & Laura Hering & Stéphanie Monjon & Sandra Poncet, 2019. "Trade policy repercussions: the role of local product space -Evidence from China," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-02065779, HAL.
    13. Linh Thuy Pham & Yothin Jinjarak, 2023. "Global value chains and female employment: The evidence from Vietnam," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 726-757, March.
    14. Fatum, Rasmus & Liu, Runjuan & Tong, Jiadong & Xu, Jiayun, 2018. "Beggar thy neighbor or beggar thy domestic firms? Evidence from 2000 to 2011 Chinese customs data," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 16-29.
    15. Yuanhong Hu & Sheng Sun & Yixin Dai, 2021. "Environmental regulation, green innovation, and international competitiveness of manufacturing enterprises in China: From the perspective of heterogeneous regulatory tools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Lu, Yue & Shi, Huimin & Luo, Wei & Liu, Bin, 2018. "Productivity, financial constraints, and firms' global value chain participation: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 184-194.
    17. Yue Hua & Yue Lu & Ruili Zhao, 2022. "Global value chain engagement and air pollution: Evidence from Chinese firms," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 708-727, July.
    18. Yue Lu & Lijing Deng & Ka Zeng, 2022. "Foreign direct investment, innovation, and domestic value‐added in exports: Firm‐level evidence from China," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1199-1228, September.
    19. Lin Chen & Sumei Luo & Tian Zhao, 2019. "Financial Constraints, Trade Mode Transition, and Global Value Chain Upgrading of Chinese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    20. Dongwei Wen & Guoming Xian, 2022. "How is China's trade imbalance overstated? An analysis based on trade in value‐added," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 1361-1392, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8181-:d:1149549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.