IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p8052-d1147579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigation of Global Climate Change through Genetic Improvement of Resin Production from Resinous Pines: The Case of Pinus halepensis in Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Tsaktsira

    (Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Parthena Tsoulpha

    (Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Athanasios Economou

    (Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Apostolos Scaltsoyiannes

    (Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Plant Breeding, School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Carbon sequestration by forests and storage in biomass has gained great interest globally in climate change mitigation. Resinous pine forests act as ideal carbon sinks because, in addition to capturing atmospheric CO 2 for biomass production, they produce resin (resin concentration in C: 77.17% w/w), contributing further to the mitigation of the greenhouse effect. Greece until the 1970s was considered one of the main resin-producing countries of Europe, due to the quantity and quality of resin products collected from natural populations mainly of Pinus halepensis Mill. Previous and current research has shown that resin production is a genetically controlled trait (h 2 > 0.70) that exhibits great variability among trees (resin 0.5–33.0 kg per tree and year). The above led to the genetic selection of P. halepensis genotypes with constant over time high resin yields (≥20 kg per tree and year) and consequently greater atmospheric CO 2 sequestration for more effective counteracting climate change but also for economic reasons for the benefit of resin producers. These high-yielding genotypes were cloned through grafting on P. brutia rootstocks and became potential trees for establishing commercial pine plantations. Thus, one hectare of commercial plantation of 500 P. halepensis trees, with a resin yield of 20 kg per tree, is expected to sequester 28.31 tn CO 2 per year (instead of 2.82 tn of CO 2 per year of a natural stand of 400 P. halepensis trees based on a resin yield of 2.5 kg per tree), at the productive age of 25 years. In this case, commercial plantations with improved genotypes of P. halepensis have great potential not only in mitigating the concentration of CO 2 in the atmosphere, but also in restoring degraded marginal areas and arid soils, and at the same time can offer social and economic benefits to the local communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Tsaktsira & Parthena Tsoulpha & Athanasios Economou & Apostolos Scaltsoyiannes, 2023. "Mitigation of Global Climate Change through Genetic Improvement of Resin Production from Resinous Pines: The Case of Pinus halepensis in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8052-:d:1147579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8052/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/8052/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Sedjo & Joe Wisniewski & Alaric Sample & John Kinsman, 1995. "The economics of managing carbon via forestry: Assessment of existing studies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 139-165, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montree Wongsiriwittaya & Teerapat Chompookham & Bopit Bubphachot, 2023. "Improvement of Higher Heating Value and Hygroscopicity Reduction of Torrefied Rice Husk by Torrefaction and Circulating Gas in the System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Petros A. Tsioras & Christina Giamouki & Maria Tsaktsira & Apostolos Scaltsoyiannes, 2023. "What the Fire Has Left Behind: Views and Perspectives of Resin Tappers in Central Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vollebergh, Herman, 1997. "Environmental externalities and social optimality in biomass markets: waste-to-energy in The Netherlands and biofuels in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 605-621, May.
    2. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Eagle, Alison J. & Manley, James G. & Smolak, Tara M., 2004. "How Costly Are Carbon Offsets? A Meta-Analysis Of Carbon Forest Sinks," Working Papers 18166, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    3. McKenney, Daniel W. & Yemshanov, Denys & Fox, Glenn & Ramlal, Elizabeth, 2004. "Cost estimates for carbon sequestration from fast growing poplar plantations in Canada," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 345-358, June.
    4. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Sohngen, Brent, 2007. "Economics of Forest Ecosystem Carbon Sinks: A Review," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 237-269, September.
    5. Golub, Alexander & Herrera, Diego & Leslie, Gabriela & Pietracci, Breno & Lubowski, Ruben, 2021. "A real options framework for reducing emissions from deforestation: Reconciling short-term incentives with long-term benefits from conservation and agricultural intensification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    6. I.J. Bateman & A.P. Jones & A.A. Lovett & I.R. Lake & B.H. Day, 2002. "Applying Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to Environmental and Resource Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 22(1), pages 219-269, June.
    7. Feenstra, T.L., 1998. "Environmental policy instruments and international rivalry : A dynamic analysis," Other publications TiSEM 8d87c905-8af6-45a9-8305-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. G. Cornelis Kooten, 2000. "Economic Dynamics of Tree Planting for Carbon Uptake on Marginal Agricultural Lands," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 48(1), pages 51-65, March.
    9. Goulder, Lawrence H. & Pizer, William A., 2006. "The Economics of Climate Change," RFF Working Paper Series dp-06-06, Resources for the Future.
    10. Miettinen, Jenni & Ollikainen, Markku & Nieminen, Tiina M. & Ukonmaanaho, Liisa & Laurén, Ari & Hynynen, Jari & Lehtonen, Mika & Valsta, Lauri, 2014. "Whole-tree harvesting with stump removal versus stem-only harvesting in peatlands when water quality, biodiversity conservation and climate change mitigation matter," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 25-35.
    11. Sedjo, Roger, 1999. "Potential for Carbon Forest Plantation in Marginal Timber Forests: The Case of Patagonia, Argentina," RFF Working Paper Series dp-99-27, Resources for the Future.
    12. Tavoni, Massimo & Sohngen, Brent & Bosetti, Valentina, 2007. "Forestry and the carbon market response to stabilize climate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 5346-5353, November.
    13. Zhonglin Xu & Chuanyan Zhao & Zhaodong Feng & Fang Zhang & Hassan Sher & Chao Wang & Huanhua Peng & Ying Wang & Yang Zhao & Yao Wang & Shouzhang Peng & Xianglin Zheng, 2013. "Estimating realized and potential carbon storage benefits from reforestation and afforestation under climate change: a case study of the Qinghai spruce forests in the Qilian Mountains, northwestern Ch," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 1257-1268, December.
    14. Yang, Hongqiang & Li, Xi, 2018. "Potential variation in opportunity cost estimates for REDD+ and its causes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 138-146.
    15. Lintunen, Jussi & Uusivuori, Jussi, 2014. "On The Economics of Forest Carbon: Renewable and Carbon Neutral But Not Emission Free," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 165755, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. David Lutz & Richard Howarth, 2014. "Valuing albedo as an ecosystem service: implications for forest management," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(1), pages 53-63, May.
    17. Tassone, Valentina C. & Wesseler, Justus & Nesci, Francesco S., 2004. "Diverging incentives for afforestation from carbon sequestration: an economic analysis of the EU afforestation program in the south of Italy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(6), pages 567-578, October.
    18. Gren, Ing-Marie & Tirkaso, Wondmagegn, 2021. "Costs and equity of uncertain greenhouse gas reductions – fuel, food and negative emissions in Sweden," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Creedy, John & Wurzbacher, Anke D., 2001. "The economic value of a forested catchment with timber, water and carbon sequestration benefits," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 71-83, July.
    20. Gren, Ing-Marie & Zeleke, Abenezer Aklilu, 2016. "Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 128-136.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:8052-:d:1147579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.