IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7924-d1145137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Soil Screening Study to Evaluate Soil Health for Urban Garden Applications in Hartford, CT

Author

Listed:
  • Hayley Clos

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA)

  • Marisa Chrysochoou

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA)

  • Nefeli Bompoti

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06268, USA)

  • Jacob Isleib

    (United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Tolland, CT 06084, USA)

Abstract

Urban agriculture is a sustainable practice for communities to have access to healthy and affordable produce by reducing the energy costs of food production and distribution. While raised beds are often used in community gardens to ensure that soil quality meets proper standards, the use of existing urban soils is desired for economic and sustainability purposes. The main objective of this study is to evaluate a methodology to test soil health parameters using in situ screening methods. Soil testing was conducted at three urban lots in Hartford, CT, that were candidates for community gardens. In situ measurements of metals were taken with a pXRF instrument in all three lots, and an additional 30 samples were tested in the laboratory, both on pressed pellets via pXRF and with acid digestion and ICP-MS analysis. Ultimately, in situ pXRF measurements were comparable to pelletized pXRF and ICP-MS measurements for elements of interest, and pXRF is shown to be a reliable screening tool to evaluate exceedances for metal regulatory thresholds exceeding 100 ppm (e.g., Pb, Cu, Ni, Zn, and Se), although soil moisture content exceeding 5% is shown to have a dilution effect on in situ results up to about a 30% difference. The current study serves as a case study in Hartford, CT, for the evaluation of in situ pXRF analysis as a rapid soil screening tool, and further research will be needed to extend the current recommendations to a general rapid soil assessment methodology.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayley Clos & Marisa Chrysochoou & Nefeli Bompoti & Jacob Isleib, 2023. "A Soil Screening Study to Evaluate Soil Health for Urban Garden Applications in Hartford, CT," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7924-:d:1145137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heimlich, Ralph E. & Barnard, Charles H., 1992. "Agricultural Adaptation To Urbanization: Farm Types In Northeast Metropolitan Areas," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Mei-luan & Bills, Nelson L. & Francis, Joseph, 2006. "Historical and Spatial Analysis of High-Value Crop Production in the U.S," Working Papers 127063, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Nehring, Richard & Erickson, Kenneth & Michael, Harris & Hallahan, Charlie & Katchova, Ani, 2016. "Heartland, Southern Seaboard, and Prairie Gateway: A Farm-Level Analysis," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235666, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Coisnon, Thomas & Oueslati, Walid & Salanié, Julien, 2014. "Urban sprawl occurrence under spatially varying agricultural amenities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 38-49.
    4. Findeis, Jill L. & Lass, Daniel A., 1992. "Farm Operator Off-farm Labor Supply and Hired Labor Use on Pennsylvania Farms," Staff Paper Series 256845, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    5. Cheng, Mei-luan & Gomez, Miguel I. & Bills, Nelson L., 2011. "Urban Agglomeration Economies in the U.S. Greenhouse and Nursery Production," Working Papers 126611, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    6. Wojciech Sroka & Bernd Pölling & Tomasz Wojewodzic & Miroslaw Strus & Paulina Stolarczyk & Olga Podlinska, 2019. "Determinants of Farmland Abandonment in Selected Metropolitan Areas of Poland: A Spatial Analysis on the Basis of Regression Trees and Interviews with Experts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Parks, Peter J. & Schorr, James P., 1997. "Sustaining Open Space Benefits in the Northeast: An Evaluation of the Conservation Reserve Program," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 85-94, January.
    8. Bernd Pölling, 2016. "Comparison of Farm Structures, Success Factors, Obstacles, Clients’ Expectations and Policy Wishes of Urban Farming’s Main Business Models in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Jeremy Porter & Philip Mason & Frank Howell, 2013. "Metropolitan Influence and Land Use Competition in Potential Biomass Crop Production: A Spatial Demographic Analysis," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(2), pages 285-310, April.
    10. Pölling, Bernd & Sroka, Wojciech & Mergenthaler, Marcus, 2017. "Success of urban farming’s city-adjustments and business models—Findings from a survey among farmers in Ruhr Metropolis, Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 372-385.
    11. Maynard, Leigh J. & Kelsey, Timothy W. & Lembeck, Stanford M. & Becker, John C., 1995. "Agricultural Conservation Easements and Farm Adaptation to Urbanizing Environments," Staff Paper Series 256849, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    12. Galen Newman & Jesse Saginor, 2016. "Priorities for Advancing the Concept of New Ruralism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Thomas Coisnon & Walid Oueslati & Julien Salanié, 2013. "Spatial targeting of agri-environmental policy and urban development," Post-Print halshs-00949730, HAL.
    14. Bernd Pölling & Marcus Mergenthaler, 2017. "The Location Matters: Determinants for “Deepening” and “Broadening” Diversification Strategies in Ruhr Metropolis’ Urban Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Thomas Coisnon & Walid Oueslati & Julien Salanié, 2012. "Agri-environmental policy and urban sprawl patterns: A general equilibrium analysis," Working Papers halshs-00753221, HAL.
    16. Marino Davide & Giannelli Agostino & Mazzocchi Giampiero & Mastronardi Luigi & Giaccio Vincenzo, 2018. "Territorialisation dynamics for Italian farms adhering to Alternative Food Networks," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 40(40), pages 113-131, June.
    17. Thomas Coisnon & Walid Oueslati & Julien Salanié, 2012. "Urban sprawl occurrence under spatially varying agricultural bid-rent and amenities," Working Papers halshs-00748681, HAL.
    18. Wojewodzic, Tomasz & Sroka, Wojciech, 2018. "Commercial farms in metropolitan areas in Poland: changes in production factor resources," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 181(4), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7924-:d:1145137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.