IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p86-d1010205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Endah Murtiana Sari

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta 11510, Indonesia)

  • Agustinus Purna Irawan

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Tarumanagara, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia)

  • Mochamad Agung Wibowo

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia)

  • Januar Parlaungan Siregar

    (Faculty of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pekan 26600, Malaysia)

  • Arief Kusuma Among Praja

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta 11510, Indonesia)

Abstract

The project delivery system has a large effect in determining the quality of a project. Strategic plans determined by the owner in the project initiation phase must ensure that project performance indicators in the form of cost and quality as well as time are accomplished. A concept of partnering that is well-managed and planned from the initiation phase will determine the quality of the construction project. Increasing the maturity of partnering is needed in order to achieve better project performance indicators. The concept of partnering in integrated and non-integrated projects has a different pattern. This study intends to discuss the concept of partnering and then recommend several key strategies according to the project life cycle. Research this study is quantitative, analyzing secondary data in the form of weekly meetings and project reports with the comparative method and cause-and-effect analysis. The results show that in the phase above 51% of ongoing projects, there is a significant difference in the pattern of partnering between integrated and non-integrated projects. In order to improve deeper partnering, this research reveals several prerequisites that must be met in order to carry out effective partnering in non-integrated projects. This research may benefit owners, contractors, and stakeholders who want to develop their understanding and knowledge of the concepts of partnering and the maturity of partnering, which will be new strategies for developing and improving project delivery systems. This study focuses on a topic from the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically partnership for the goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Endah Murtiana Sari & Agustinus Purna Irawan & Mochamad Agung Wibowo & Januar Parlaungan Siregar & Arief Kusuma Among Praja, 2022. "Project Delivery Systems: The Partnering Concept in Integrated and Non-Integrated Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:86-:d:1010205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/86/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/86/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gayoung Choi & Taeyoung Jin & Yoonjeong Jeong & Sue Kyoung Lee, 2020. "Evolution of Partnerships for Sustainable Development: The Case of P4G," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Tamar Awad & Jesús Guardiola & David Fraíz, 2021. "Sustainable Construction: Improving Productivity through Lean Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Marina Mikhailovna Pukhova & Irina Anatolievna Merkulina & Dmitry Yuryevich Bashkov, 2021. "Developing Public–Private Partnership Projects to Enhance Innovation Capability in the Defence Industry," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Guoli Feng & Shengyue Hao & Xiaoguang Li, 2022. "Project Sustainability and Public-Private Partnership: The Role of Government Relation Orientation and Project Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Xiaosu Ye & Hanyue Qi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Hermínia Gonçalves, 2022. "Welfare-Partnership Dynamics and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Hoe Chin Goi & Muhammad Mohsin Hakeem & Frendy, 2022. "Bridging Academics’ Roles in Knowledge Diffusion in Sustainability-Driven Public–Private Partnerships: A Case Study of the SDGs Workshop in Central Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Frantisek Kuda & Petr Dlask & Marek Teichmann & Vaclav Beran, 2022. "Time–Cost Schedules and Project–Threats Indication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Paloma Gónzalez-Gómez-del-Miño & Juan Felipe Espinosa-Cristia, 2021. "Recognizing New Trends in Brain Drain Studies in the Framework of Global Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Fusheng Xie & Lei Hang, 2022. "A Game-Theory-Based Interaction Mechanism between Central and Local Governments on Financing Model Selection in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Fusheng Xie, 2022. "Research on Sustainability of Financing Mode and Demand of PPP Project—Based on Chinese PPP and Local Financing Platform Alternative Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Li, Xue & Tan, Alexander Jun Hao & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Investigating gig workers’ commitment to crowdsourced logistics platforms: Fair employment and social exchange perspectives," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Abdullah Emre Keleş & Hatice Kübra Yılmaz, 2022. "Investigation of Lean Production Knowledge among Employees in Building Inspection Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:86-:d:1010205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.