IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p671-d1020466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation Input: An Empirical Study Based on Propensity Score-Matching and Quantile Models

Author

Listed:
  • Linsheng Chen

    (College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, 999 Huchenghuan Road, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Siew Hoon Lim

    (Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics, North Dakota State University Fargo, Fargo, ND 58108-6060, USA)

  • Shiwei Xu

    (College of Business, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Ying Liu

    (School of Business Administration, Guangxi Vocational and Technical Institute of Industry, 37 Xiuling Road, Nanning 530001, China)

Abstract

Social responsibility performance and innovation investment are two important aspects of corporate strategy, and there is no consensus as to whether they are competing or complementary goals in an enterprise. Using propensity score-matching, ordinary least squares, and quantile regression, the study shows that the voluntary disclosure of social responsibility by enterprises will increase innovation investment. In other words, corporate social responsibility has a significant positive impact on innovation and investment; however, with the increase in enterprise innovation investment, this impact gradually weakens.

Suggested Citation

  • Linsheng Chen & Siew Hoon Lim & Shiwei Xu & Ying Liu, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation Input: An Empirical Study Based on Propensity Score-Matching and Quantile Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:671-:d:1020466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/671/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/671/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dawid Szutowski & Piotr Ratajczak, 2016. "The Relation between CSR and Innovation. Model Approach," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(2), pages 1-1.
    2. Shiwei Xu & Mingzhe Qiao & Bin Che & Peng Tong, 2019. "Regional Anti-Corruption and CSR Disclosure in a Transition Economy: The Contingent Effects of Ownership and Political Connection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Bocquet, Rachel & Le Bas, Christian & Mothe, Caroline & Poussing, Nicolas, 2013. "Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 642-654.
    4. Derek Bosworth & Mark Rogers, 2001. "Market Value, R&D and Intellectual Property: An Empirical Analysis of Large Australian Firms," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 77(239), pages 323-337, December.
    5. Marco Caliendo & Sabine Kopeinig, 2008. "Some Practical Guidance For The Implementation Of Propensity Score Matching," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 31-72, February.
    6. repec:bla:ecorec:v:77:y:2001:i:239:p:323-37 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:hal:journl:hal-00918528 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Abagail McWilliams & Donald Siegel, 2000. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 603-609, May.
    9. Lee, Gemma & Masulis, Ronald W., 2011. "Do more reputable financial institutions reduce earnings management by IPO issuers?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 982-1000, September.
    10. Yongwook Paik & Heejin Woo, 2017. "The Effects of Corporate Venture Capital, Founder Incumbency, and Their Interaction on Entrepreneurial Firms’ R&D Investment Strategies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 670-689, August.
    11. Chay, J.B. & Park, Soon Hong & Kim, Soojung & Suh, Jungwon, 2015. "Financing hierarchy: Evidence from quantile regression," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 147-163.
    12. Brian Uzzi & Ryon Lancaster, 2003. "Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 383-399, April.
    13. Ho, Simon S.M. & Li, Annie Yuansha & Tam, Kinsun & Tong, Jamie Y., 2016. "Ethical image, corporate social responsibility, and R&D valuation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 40(PB), pages 335-348.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Chung-Hua & Wu, Meng-Wen & Chen, Ting-Hsuan & Fang, Hao, 2016. "To engage or not to engage in corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from global banking sector," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 207-225.
    2. Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel & Reverte, Carmelo & Gómez-Melero, Eduardo & Wensley, Anthony K.P., 2016. "Linking social and economic responsibilities with financial performance: The role of innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 530-539.
    3. Suyun Chen & Yu Ji, 2022. "Do Corporate Social Responsibility Categories Distinctly Influence Innovation? A Resource-Based Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Dawid Szutowski & Piotr Ratajczak, 2016. "The Relation between CSR and Innovation. Model Approach," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(2), pages 1-1.
    5. Pasquale Ruggiero & Sebastiano Cupertino, 2018. "CSR Strategic Approach, Financial Resources and Corporate Social Performance: The Mediating Effect of Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Riillo, Cesare Fabio Antonio & Sarracino, Francesco, 2014. "Motivations for Corporate Social Responsibility: all talk and no walk?," MPRA Paper 60211, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Lin, Yongjia & Fu, Xiaoqing & Fu, Xiaolan, 2021. "Varieties in state capitalism and corporate innovation: Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Li, Yan & Wang, Junkai & Mu, Zi & Li, Lingxiao, 2023. "The impact of corporate environmental responsibility on green technological innovation: A nonlinear model including mediate effects and moderate effects," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 754-769.
    9. Ginesti, Gianluca & Campa, Domenico & Spano’, Rosanna & Allini, Alessandra & Maffei, Marco, 2023. "The role of CSR committee characteristics on R&D investments," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(5).
    10. Rachel Bocquet & Christian Le Bas & Caroline Danièle Mothe & Nicolas Poussing, 2019. "Strategic CSR for innovation in SMEs: Does diversity matter?," Post-Print hal-02380559, HAL.
    11. Broadstock, David C. & Matousek, Roman & Meyer, Martin & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 99-110.
    12. Meftah Gerged, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Uyar, Ali & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Does investment stimulate or inhibit CSR transparency? The moderating role of CSR committee, board monitoring and CEO duality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Ransford Anertey Abbey, 2022. "Exploring the nexus between corporate social responsibility (CSR) fulfilment and firms’ innovation performance," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-18, August.
    14. Rachel Bocquet & Christian Le Bas & Caroline Mothe & Nicolas Poussing, 2017. "CSR, Innovation, and Firm Performance in Sluggish Growth Contexts: A Firm-Level Empirical Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 241-254, November.
    15. Wu, Wuqing & Peng, Fei & Shan, Yuan George & Jie, Xiaoxiao, 2020. "Signaling through corporate philanthropy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Incheol Kim & Hong Wan & Bin Wang & Tina Yang, 2019. "Institutional Investors and Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies: Evidence from Toxics Release Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4901-4926, October.
    17. Coluccia, Daniela & Dabić, Marina & Del Giudice, Manlio & Fontana, Stefano & Solimene, Silvia, 2020. "R&D innovation indicator and its effects on the market. An empirical assessment from a financial perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 259-271.
    18. Forcadell, Francisco Javier & Úbeda, Fernando & Aracil, Elisa, 2021. "Effects of environmental corporate social responsibility on innovativeness of spanish industrial SMEs✰,✰✰,★,★★," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Fan, Di & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Zhou, Yi, 2021. "Sustainability risk in supply bases: The role of complexity and coupling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    20. Hsiao-Fen Hsiao & Tingyong Zhong & Jun Wang, 2024. "Does national culture influence corporate social responsibility on firm performance?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:671-:d:1020466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.