IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p432-d1016422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Reform, Technological Progress and Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Dechao Han

    (Business School, Henan University of Science and Technology, 263 Kaiyuan Blvd., Luolong District, Luoyang 471023, China)

Abstract

Beneficial institutional environments help to improve TFP in manufacturing. However, it is unclear whether China’s structural reform has led to improvements in TFP in the manufacturing industry. In this study, Sys-GMM was employed to assess the relationships between structural reform, technological progress and manufacturing TFP using panel data from provincial-level administrative regions in China from 2010 to 2020. The results showed the following: (1) Structural reform induced a spiral-shaped upward trend of TFP by affecting the technological progress levels of enterprises in China, which was also enhanced by improvements in regional technology levels. (2) The impact of market-oriented reform on industrial TFP was similar to that of entire structural reform; however, innovation environments did not significantly impact industrial TFP, technological progress had no regulatory effect and although the reform and the supply of public services could significantly promote improvements in industrial TFP, technological progress also exhibited no significant regulatory effect on these improvements. (3) The flow of technology and labor significantly, positively correlated with industrial TFP, while resource idleness had a salient inhibitory effect. In addition, enhancement of the disclosed comparative advantage, as well as further opening and expansion of operation scales of the manufacturing industry, could improve industrial TFP even more.

Suggested Citation

  • Dechao Han, 2022. "Structural Reform, Technological Progress and Total Factor Productivity in Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:432-:d:1016422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/432/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/432/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barrell, Ray & Pain, Nigel, 1997. "The Growth of Foreign Direct Investment in Europe," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 160, pages 63-75, April.
    2. Barrell, Ray & Pain, Nigel, 1997. "The Growth of Foreign Direct Investment in Europe," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 160, pages 63-75, April.
    3. Phu Nguyen-Van & Thi Kim Cuong Pham & Duc-Anh Le, 2019. "Productivity and public expenditure: a structural estimation for Vietnam’s provinces," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 95-120, February.
    4. Daron Acemoglu & Ufuk Akcigit & Harun Alp & Nicholas Bloom & William Kerr, 2018. "Innovation, Reallocation, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(11), pages 3450-3491, November.
    5. Hugo Pinto & João Guerreiro, 2010. "Innovation regional planning and latent dimensions: the case of the Algarve region," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(2), pages 315-329, April.
    6. Paul Krugman & Anthony J. Venables, 1995. "Globalization and the Inequality of Nations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(4), pages 857-880.
    7. repec:hhs:iuiwop:430 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Peter J. Klenow, 2009. "Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(4), pages 1403-1448.
    9. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    10. Barrell, Ray & Pain, Nigel, 1997. "Foreign Direct Investment, Technological Change, and Economic Growth within Europe," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 107(445), pages 1770-1786, November.
    11. Geoffrey Wyatt, 2005. "Government Consumption and Industrial Productivity: Scale and Compositional Effects," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 341-357, July.
    12. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2002. "The determinants of national innovative capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 899-933, August.
    13. Sumit Dey-Chowdhury, 2008. "Methods explained: Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM)," Economic & Labour Market Review, Palgrave Macmillan;Office for National Statistics, vol. 2(9), pages 48-52, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingtai Wu & Xinyi Cai & Fei Zuo & Yue Dong, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Common Institutional Ownership on Corporate Green Transformation in the Context of “Dual Carbon”: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2017. "Innovations, growth and participation in advanced economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 293-351, April.
    2. Garita, Gus, 2009. "How Does Financial Openness Affect Economic Growth and its Components?," MPRA Paper 20099, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Barrell, Ray & Nahhas, Abdulkader, 2018. "Economic integration and bilateral FDI stocks: the impacts of NAFTA and the EU," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90372, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Nigel Driffield & James Love & Karl Taylor, 2008. "Productivity and Labour Demand Effects of Inward and Outward FDI on UK Industry," Working Papers 2008001, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2008.
    5. Suqin Ge & Dennis Tao Yang, 2014. "Changes In China'S Wage Structure," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 300-336, April.
    6. Bettina Becker & Nigel Driffield & Sandra Lancheros & James H. Love, 2020. "FDI in hot labour markets: The implications of the war for talent," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(2), pages 107-133, June.
    7. Dellis, Konstantinos & Sondermann, David & Vansteenkiste, Isabel, 2017. "Determinants of FDI inflows in advanced economies: Does the quality of economic structures matter?," Working Paper Series 2066, European Central Bank.
    8. Ray Barrell & Abdulkader Nahhas, 2022. "Regional integration and bilateral FDI stocks in the OECD," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 3032-3050, July.
    9. Mar𨀠 Ángeles Cadarso Vecina & Nuria Gómez Sanz & Luis Antonio López Santiago & Mar𨀠 Ángeles Tobarra Gómez, 2012. "Offshoring components and their effect on employment: firms deciding about how and where," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1009-1020, March.
    10. Paul Welfens, 2014. "Issues of modern macroeconomics: new post-crisis perspectives on the world economy," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 481-527, December.
    11. Baker, Jessica & Carreras, Oriol & Kirby, Simon & Meaning, Jack & Piggott, Rebecca, 2016. "Modelling events: The short-term economic impact of leaving the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 339-350.
    12. M. T. Alguacil & V. Orts, 2003. "Inward Foreign Direct Investment and Imports in Spain," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 19-38.
    13. Pain, Nigel & Young, Garry, 2004. "The macroeconomic impact of UK withdrawal from the EU," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 387-408, May.
    14. Kateřina Šmídková & Ray Barrell & Dawn Holland, 2003. "Estimates of fundamental real exchange rates for the five eu pre-accession countries," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(4), pages 291-315.
    15. Ray Barrell & Sylvia Gottschalk & Dawn Holland & Ehsan Khoman & Iana Liadze & Olga Pomerantz, 2008. "The impact of EMU on growth and employment," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 318, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    16. Kose,Ayhan & Ohnsorge,Franziska Lieselotte & Ye,Lei Sandy & Islamaj,Ergys, 2017. "Weakness in investment growth : causes, implications and policy responses," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7990, The World Bank.
    17. Frank Cörvers & Jaanika Meriküll, 2007. "Occupational structures across 25 EU countries: the importance of industry structure and technology in old and new EU countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 327-359, December.
    18. Kutan, Ali M. & Yigit, Taner M., 2007. "European integration, productivity growth and real convergence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(6), pages 1370-1395, August.
    19. Rachel Griffith & Helen Simpson, 2004. "Characteristics of Foreign-Owned Firms in British Manufacturing," NBER Chapters, in: Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980–2000, pages 147-180, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Alberto Onetti & Hal Steger, 2007. "Formulating an open source business model requires community segmentation and targeted marketing," Economics and Quantitative Methods qf0707, Department of Economics, University of Insubria.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:432-:d:1016422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.