IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p213-d1012499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“ Burger.i.doo ”—An Innovative Education Game for the Assessment of Sustainability from Meat and Substitute Products in Science Education

Author

Listed:
  • Tatjana Korte

    (Department of Biology/Chemistry, Didactics of Chemistry and Science Communication, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany)

  • Lars Otte

    (Department of Biology/Chemistry, Didactics of Chemistry and Science Communication, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany)

  • Henning Amel

    (Department of Biology/Chemistry, Didactics of Chemistry and Science Communication, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany)

  • Marco Beeken

    (Department of Biology/Chemistry, Didactics of Chemistry and Science Communication, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany)

Abstract

How will we be fed in the future? Without a doubt, the recent development has to undergo a change, to stick to the aims of sustainable development. Modern agriculture is in the compulsion of its consumers’ behaviour and the constantly growing amount of food required for feeding the world population. This nutrition is taken into individual responsibility, but to be able to make decisions regarding sustainable nutrition, educational work is required. By determining the environmental impact of different ingredients, Burger.i.doo contributes to the Education of Sustainable Nutrition and empowers its gamers to gain and extend their knowledge about the consumption of capabilities. It is designed for students aged 14 to 18. The aim is to create the most sustainable burger, which is measured in five categories: greenhouse gas emission, water consumption, land use, price and taste, by comparing the different categories of vegan, vegetarian, pescetarian and different meat options of burgers. To evaluate the impact of the game, a survey was conducted. It shows that the key targets of the construction of the game are fulfilled: the gamers had fun, learned about the impact of food on the environment and the game had a positive influence on their environmental consciousness.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatjana Korte & Lars Otte & Henning Amel & Marco Beeken, 2022. "“ Burger.i.doo ”—An Innovative Education Game for the Assessment of Sustainability from Meat and Substitute Products in Science Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:213-:d:1012499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/213/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/213/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Marcus & Heather MacDonald & Lorne Sulsky, 2015. "Do Personal Values Influence the Propensity for Sustainability Actions? A Policy-Capturing Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 459-478, March.
    2. Alberto Garrido & M. Ramón Llamas & Consuelo Varela-Ortega & Paula Novo & Roberto Rodríguez-Casado & Maite M. Aldaya, 2010. "Water Footprint and Virtual Water Trade in Spain," Natural Resource Management and Policy, Springer, number 978-1-4419-5741-2, March.
    3. Dipa Sinha, 2021. "Hunger and food security in the times of Covid-19," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(2), pages 320-331, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ignacio Cazcarro & Rosa Duarte & Miguel Martín-Retortillo & Vicente Pinilla & Ana Serrano, 2015. "How Sustainable is the Increase in the Water Footprint of the Spanish Agricultural Sector? A Provincial Analysis between 1955 and 2005–2010," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Shraddha Yadav & Yingjiao Xu & Helmut Hergeth, 2024. "Walking the Talk: Unraveling the Influence of the Sustainability Features of Leather Alternatives on Consumer Behavior toward Running Shoes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Ehsan Qasemipour & Ali Abbasi & Farhad Tarahomi, 2020. "Water-Saving Scenarios Based on Input–Output Analysis and Virtual Water Concept: A Case in Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Rui Zhao & Hualing He & Ning Zhang, 2015. "Regional Water Footprint Assessment: A Case Study of Leshan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Arjen Y. Hoekstra, 2017. "Water Footprint Assessment: Evolvement of a New Research Field," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(10), pages 3061-3081, August.
    6. L. Brilli & E. Lugato & M. Moriondo & B. Gioli & P. Toscano & A. Zaldei & L. Leolini & C. Cantini & G. Caruso & R. Gucci & P. Merante & C. Dibari & R. Ferrise & M. Bindi & S. Costafreda-Aumedes, 2019. "Carbon sequestration capacity and productivity responses of Mediterranean olive groves under future climates and management options," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 467-491, March.
    7. María Jesús Beltrán & Esther Velázquez, 2011. "Del metabolismo social al metabolismo hídrico," Documentos de Trabajo de la Asociación de Economía Ecológica en España 01_2011, Asociación de Economía Ecológica en España.
    8. Talavera, Oleksandr & Yin, Shuxing & Zhang, Mao, 2016. "Managing the diversity: board age diversity, directors’ personal values, and bank performance," MPRA Paper 71927, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Juliane Peters & Ana Simaens, 2020. "Integrating Sustainability into Corporate Strategy: A Case Study of the Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-35, July.
    10. Marta Antonelli & Martina Sartori, 2014. "Unfolding the Potential of the Virtual Water Concept. What is still under debate?," IEFE Working Papers 74, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    11. Vita Serman, Facundo & Orgaz, Francisco & Starobinsky, Gabriela & Capraro, Flavio & Fereres, Elias, 2021. "Water productivity and net profit of high-density olive orchards in San Juan, Argentina," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Sesma Martín, Diego & Rubio-Varas, Mª. del Mar, 2017. "Freshwater for Cooling Needs: A Long-Run Approach to the Nuclear Water Footprint in Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 146-156.
    13. Dabić, Marina & Maley, Jane F. & Črešnar, Rok & Nedelko, Zlatko, 2023. "Unappreciated channel of manufacturing productivity under industry 4.0: Leadership values and capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Fernández, J.E. & Alcon, F. & Diaz-Espejo, A. & Hernandez-Santana, V. & Cuevas, M.V., 2020. "Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high density olive tree orchard," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    15. Thomas Daum & Hans Konrad Biesalski & Nikola Blaschke & Christine Bosch & Denise Güttler & Jakob Heni & Juliet Kariuki & Roseline Katusiime & Anna Seidel & Zinsou‐Narcisse Senon & George Woode & Regin, 2023. "Nutrition‐sensitive lockdowns: Conceptual framework and empirical insights from Africa during COVID‐19," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(3), May.
    16. Duarte, Rosa & Pinilla, Vicente & Serrano, Ana, 2014. "The water footprint of the Spanish agricultural sector: 1860–2010," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 200-207.
    17. Rok Črešnar & Zlatko Nedelko, 2020. "Understanding Future Leaders: How Are Personal Values of Generations Y and Z Tailored to Leadership in Industry 4.0?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Won‐Moo Hur & Tae‐Won Moon & Han‐Geun Lee, 2018. "Employee engagement in CSR initiatives and customer‐directed counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The mediating roles of organizational civility norms and job calling," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1087-1098, November.
    19. Zlatko Nedelko & Vojko Potocan, 2021. "Sustainability of Organizations: The Contribution of Personal Values to Democratic Leadership Behavior Focused on the Sustainability of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Maria Jose Murcia & Pilar Acosta, 2023. "Accounting for Plural Cognitive Framings of Growth and Sustainability: Rethinking Management Education in Latin America," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 299-313, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:213-:d:1012499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.