IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5180-d801813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Study on Carbon Footprint Life-Cycle Assessment for Construction Delivery Stage in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojuan Li

    (College of Transportation and Civil Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350108, China)

  • Chen Wang

    (Intelligence and Automation in Construction Fujian Province Higher-Educational Engineering Research Centre, College of Civil Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen 361021, China)

  • Mukhtar A. Kassem

    (Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, University of Technology Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia)

  • Shu-Yi Wu

    (Transportation Bureau of Zhangzhou City, Zhangzhou 350108, China)

  • Tai-Bing Wei

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuyi University, Nanping 354300, China)

Abstract

The construction industry’s high energy consumption and carbon emissions significantly burden the ecological environment. Thus, it is necessary to study measures and strategies for emissions reduction during construction for an improved, safe and sustainable environment. Using the life-cycle assessment method, this study aims to investigate construction-building outcomes and their carbon footprint during the construction delivery stage. This work used a compiled database of carbon-emission factors per unit for concrete and mortar with different densities and 16 building-project case studies in Fujian Province to verify the empirical findings. The results show that general civil engineering works produce more carbon emissions than decoration engineering. Furthermore, cement’s average proportion of carbon emissions relative to total carbon emissions is the largest at 30.26%. Our findings also show a strong linear relationship between the total carbon emissions, eaves height, project cost, and building area during the building construction. The findings in this paper promote the conversion of buildings from high-energy consumption to multi-carbon reduction. The concept of this research contributes to the existing knowledge by proposing a carbon-footprint calculation method and establishing the trend of carbon emissions in building construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojuan Li & Chen Wang & Mukhtar A. Kassem & Shu-Yi Wu & Tai-Bing Wei, 2022. "Case Study on Carbon Footprint Life-Cycle Assessment for Construction Delivery Stage in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5180-:d:801813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miimu Airaksinen & Pellervo Matilainen, 2011. "A Carbon Footprint of an Office Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Seungjun Roh & Sungho Tae & Rakhyun Kim & Suroh Park, 2019. "Probabilistic Analysis of Major Construction Materials in the Life Cycle Embodied Environmental Cost of Korean Apartment Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Moutinho, Victor & Moreira, António Carrizo & Silva, Pedro Miguel, 2015. "The driving forces of change in energy-related CO2 emissions in Eastern, Western, Northern and Southern Europe: The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1485-1499.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaolan Chen & Kaikai Wang & Guanjiang Wan & Yufei Liu & Wenbin Liu & Wanfang Shen & Jianing Shi, 2022. "Evaluation and Empirical Research on Eco-Efficiency of Financial Industry Based on Carbon Footprint in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Zhongshuai Shen & Xueying Bao & Zilong Li & Xiangru Lv, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Filled Embankment and Excavated Graben Schemes of Railway Subgrade Engineering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Wei-Kang Lin & Xiao-Wu Tang & Yuan Zou & Jia-Xin Liang & Ke-Yi Li, 2023. "Research on the Bearing Capacity and Sustainable Construction of a Vacuum Drainage Pipe Pile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Daniel Wałach & Aleksandra Mach, 2023. "Effect of Concrete Mix Composition on Greenhouse Gas Emissions over the Full Life Cycle of a Structure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emanuele Bonamente & Franco Cotana, 2015. "Carbon and Energy Footprints of Prefabricated Industrial Buildings: A Systematic Life Cycle Assessment Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2017. "Analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s mining industry: Evidence and policy implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 77-87.
    3. Ari, Izzet & Yikmaz, Riza Fikret, 2019. "The role of renewable energy in achieving Turkey's INDC," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 244-251.
    4. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca Gabriela Petrescu & Eugenia Grecu & Marius Petrescu, 2017. "Optimizing the Renewable Energy Potential: Myth or Future Trend in Romania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, May.
    6. Ansari, Mohd Arshad, 2022. "Re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets curve for ASEAN: A comparison between ecological footprint and carbon dioxide emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Chulin Pan & Huayi Wang & Hongpeng Guo & Hong Pan, 2021. "How Do the Population Structure Changes of China Affect Carbon Emissions? An Empirical Study Based on Ridge Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Suvajit Banerjee, 2021. "Addressing the carbon emissions embodied in India’s bilateral trade with two eminent Annex-II parties: with input–output and spatial decomposition analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5430-5464, April.
    9. Wang, Zhiping & Feng, Chao & Chen, Jinyu & Huang, Jianbai, 2017. "The driving forces of material use in China: An index decomposition analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 336-348.
    10. Shigetomi, Yosuke & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Ogawa, Yuki & Shiraki, Hiroto & Yamamoto, Yuki & Ochi, Yuki & Ehara, Tomoki, 2018. "Driving forces underlying sub-national carbon dioxide emissions within the household sector and implications for the Paris Agreement targets in Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 2321-2332.
    11. Duarte, Rosa & Miranda-Buetas, Sara & Sarasa, Cristina, 2021. "Household consumption patterns and income inequality in EU countries: Scenario analysis for a fair transition towards low-carbon economies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    12. Yun-Hsun Huang & Jung-Hua Wu & Hao-Syuan Huang, 2021. "Analyzing the Driving Forces behind CO 2 Emissions in Energy-Resource-Poor and Fossil-Fuel-Centered Economies: Case Studies from Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Ruparathna, Rajeev & Hewage, Kasun & Sadiq, Rehan, 2016. "Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: A critical review of commercial and institutional buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1032-1045.
    14. Zhang, Xi & Geng, Yong & Shao, Shuai & Dong, Huijuan & Wu, Rui & Yao, Tianli & Song, Jiekun, 2020. "How to achieve China’s CO2 emission reduction targets by provincial efforts? – An analysis based on generalized Divisia index and dynamic scenario simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    15. Maowen Sun & Boyi Liang & Xuebin Meng & Yunfei Zhang & Zong Wang & Jia Wang, 2024. "Study on the Evolution of Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Carbon Emissions and Influencing Factors in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, June.
    16. Wang, Miao & Feng, Chao, 2018. "Decomposing the change in energy consumption in China's nonferrous metal industry: An empirical analysis based on the LMDI method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2652-2663.
    17. Xue-Ting Jiang & Min Su & Rongrong Li, 2018. "Decomposition Analysis in Electricity Sector Output from Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Edwin Bernard F. Lisaba & Neil Stephen A. Lopez, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Comparison of Drivers to CO 2 Emissions in ASEAN: A Decomposition Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    19. De Oliveira-De Jesus, Paulo M., 2019. "Effect of generation capacity factors on carbon emission intensity of electricity of Latin America & the Caribbean, a temporal IDA-LMDI analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 516-526.
    20. Lei Zhao & Wenbin Pan & Hao Lin, 2022. "Can Fujian Achieve Carbon Peak and Pollutant Reduction Targets before 2030? Case Study of 3E System in Southeastern China Based on System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5180-:d:801813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.