IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i8p4716-d794141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Carbon Pools of Three Indigenous Agroforestry Systems in the Southeastern Rift-Valley Landscapes, Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Hafte Mebrahten Tesfay

    (Department of Forest Biodiversity and Nature Conservation, Federal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, A-1131 Vienna, Austria
    Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria
    Department of Agroforestry, Wondogenet College of Forestry and Natural Resources, Hawassa University, Shashemene P.O. Box 128, Ethiopia)

  • Mesele Negash

    (Department of Agroforestry, Wondogenet College of Forestry and Natural Resources, Hawassa University, Shashemene P.O. Box 128, Ethiopia)

  • Douglas L. Godbold

    (Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria)

  • Herbert Hager

    (Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Peter-Jordan-Strasse 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

The role of agroforestry (AF) systems in providing ecosystem services is very crucial. The greatest considerable increase in carbon (C) storage is often attained by moving from lower biomass land-use systems to tree-based systems such as AF. However, for estimation of C stocks in indigenous AF systems of southeastern Rift-Valley landscapes, Ethiopia, the data are scarce. This study was aimed to investigate the biomass, biomass carbon (BC), and soil organic carbon (SOC) stock of Enset-based, Enset-Coffee-based, and Coffee-Fruit-tree-Enset based AF systems. Comparison of SOC stock of AF systems against their adjacent monocrop farms was also investigated. Research questions were initiated to answer whether C stocks among the three AF systems vary because of different management systems and how biomass C stock is influenced by species abundance, diversity, and richness in the AF systems. The study was carried out at three selected sites in the Dilla Zuria district of Gedeo zone. Twenty farms (total of 60) representative of each AF system were arbitrarily selected and inventoried, and the biomass C stocks estimated. Ten adjacent monocrop farms which were related to each AF system were selected in a purposive manner for comparison of SOC stock. Inventory and soil sampling were employed in the 10 × 10 m farm plot. The mean AGB ranged from 81.1 to 255.9 t ha −1 and for BGB from 26.9 to 72.2 t ha −1 . The highest C stock was found in Coffee–Fruittree–Enset based (233.3 ± 81.0 t ha −1 ), and the lowest was in Coffee–Enset based AF system (190.1 ± 29.8 t ha −1 ). The result showed that SOC stocks were not statistically significant between the three AF systems, although they showed a significant difference in their BC stock. The C stocks of the investigated AF systems are considerably higher than those reported for some tropical forests and AF systems. The SOC of AF systems is significantly higher than the ones for the adjacent monocrop farms. Therefore, it can be understood that the studied AF systems are storing significant amounts of C in their biomass as well as in soil. This considerable C storage by these systems might contribute to climate change mitigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hafte Mebrahten Tesfay & Mesele Negash & Douglas L. Godbold & Herbert Hager, 2022. "Assessing Carbon Pools of Three Indigenous Agroforestry Systems in the Southeastern Rift-Valley Landscapes, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4716-:d:794141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/8/4716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deep Narayan Pandey, 2002. "Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 367-377, December.
    2. Eike Luedeling & Henry Neufeldt, 2012. "Carbon sequestration potential of parkland agroforestry in the Sahel," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 443-461, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimir Ivezić & Klaus Lorenz & Rattan Lal, 2022. "Soil Organic Carbon in Alley Cropping Systems: A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, January.
    2. N. Hooda & M. Gera & K. Andrasko & J. Sathaye & M. Gupta & H. Vasistha & M. Chandran & S. Rassaily, 2007. "Community and farm forestry climate mitigation projects: case studies from Uttaranchal, India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 1099-1130, July.
    3. Dargains, Alexandre & Cabral, Pedro, 2021. "A GIS-based methodology for sustainable farming planning: Assessment of land use/cover changes and carbon dynamics at farm level," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Rikesh Kumar & Rakesh Kumar & Sambhunath Karmakar & Amit Kumar & Alok Kumar Singh & Abhay Kumar & Jitendra Singh, 2023. "Impact of Amide Fertilizer on Carbon Sequestration under the Agroforestry System in the Eastern Plateau Region of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Malek, Žiga & Tieskens, Koen F. & Verburg, Peter H., 2019. "Explaining the global spatial distribution of organic crop producers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Venema, Henry David & Calamai, Paul H. & Fieguth, Paul, 2005. "Forest structure optimization using evolutionary programming and landscape ecology metrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 423-439, July.
    7. Nyairo, Risper & Onwonga, Richard & Cherogony, Kipruto & Luedeling, Eike, 2014. "Applicability of Climate Analogues for Climate Change Adaptation Planning in Bugabira Commune of Burundi," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 3(4).
    8. Deep Narayan Pandey, 2005. "Multifunctional Agroforestry Systems In India For Livelihoods: Current Knowledge And Future Challenges," Working Papers id:204, eSocialSciences.
    9. Alui Konan Alphonse & Diarrassouba Nafan & Yao Saraka Didier Martial, 2020. "Carbon Sequestration Potential of Shea Trees (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) in Parklands under Two Soil Types (Ferralsol and Cambisol) in Northern Côte d'Ivoire," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 9(02), pages 14-23, February.
    10. P. Sudha & V. Ramprasad & M. Nagendra & H. Kulkarni & N. Ravindranath, 2007. "Development of an agroforestry carbon sequestration project in Khammam district, India," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 12(6), pages 1131-1152, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:4716-:d:794141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.